Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:SSSS did whole school testing yesterday (1/2) and, based on those results, is continuing with virtual for the week (Monday 1/3 was a scheduled virtual day). Return to in-person will be on Monday 1/10. There will be another whole school testing day on Thursday (1/5) to isolate any positive cases not caught by the 1/2 testing. Apparently, of the 1,214 people (students and staff) tested on 1/2, there were 135 positive results.
Sorry, that's SSSAS.
With an 11% positivity rate that seems like a reasonable approach, because this is measuring the entire school population, not a sample. The 20%+ numbers reported by state or local governments are based on a self-selected sample so they can't be directly compared to a measure of the entire population (the results reported by states are people who sought a test because they felt sick or were traveling and so can be expected to be higher in general). A second test on Thursday will help establish how much ongoing community spread there is.
I heard that over 100 students didn’t test. At least the test later in the week should catch cases from New Years celebrations
Over 100 kids missing the test is concerning. It might mean families are extending their vacations which could mess up the schools’s plan to get everyone back and tested. Hope these families have the decency to at least be back for the next round of testing since the school is doing everything they can.
Those kids were supposed to antigen test this morning before school (if in person). They canceled that because they are doing distance learning. No one was going to be let into the building without a test.
Right but my concern was these families were still traveling Sunday so stuck at an airport or whatever has a higher risk of catching covid, yet those wouldn’t show up by tues am. I hated that they did the testing so close to New Years when i know lots of families were socializing, so I think their whole testing schedule was flawed to begin with
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:why not just wait unto this 'wave' passes? I feel like a kid at the beach--when the big wave comes, we all know to dive under. Why not just stay home 2 weeks? I don't get it
Because we don't know when there will be another wave, we don't know 2 weeks are enough, we do know kids have sacrificed over and over again for a disease that largely affects adults.
Furthermore, in 2 weeks, the hospitals will be over run and then we'll say, we should cancel school because the hospitals are overrun (even though the spread of disease may have started to decline). COVID has again and again proved all forecasts are flawed. We need to make decisions that evaluate the risks as we understand them today. I'm ok with virtual this week and maybe next. I think we need to try getting the kids back to school next week.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:SSSS did whole school testing yesterday (1/2) and, based on those results, is continuing with virtual for the week (Monday 1/3 was a scheduled virtual day). Return to in-person will be on Monday 1/10. There will be another whole school testing day on Thursday (1/5) to isolate any positive cases not caught by the 1/2 testing. Apparently, of the 1,214 people (students and staff) tested on 1/2, there were 135 positive results.
Sorry, that's SSSAS.
With an 11% positivity rate that seems like a reasonable approach, because this is measuring the entire school population, not a sample. The 20%+ numbers reported by state or local governments are based on a self-selected sample so they can't be directly compared to a measure of the entire population (the results reported by states are people who sought a test because they felt sick or were traveling and so can be expected to be higher in general). A second test on Thursday will help establish how much ongoing community spread there is.
I heard that over 100 students didn’t test. At least the test later in the week should catch cases from New Years celebrations
Over 100 kids missing the test is concerning. It might mean families are extending their vacations which could mess up the schools’s plan to get everyone back and tested. Hope these families have the decency to at least be back for the next round of testing since the school is doing everything they can.
Those kids were supposed to antigen test this morning before school (if in person). They canceled that because they are doing distance learning. No one was going to be let into the building without a test.
Right but my concern was these families were still traveling Sunday so stuck at an airport or whatever has a higher risk of catching covid, yet those wouldn’t show up by tues am. I hated that they did the testing so close to New Years when i know lots of families were socializing, so I think their whole testing schedule was flawed to begin with
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:why not just wait unto this 'wave' passes? I feel like a kid at the beach--when the big wave comes, we all know to dive under. Why not just stay home 2 weeks? I don't get it
Because we don't know when there will be another wave, we don't know 2 weeks are enough, we do know kids have sacrificed over and over again for a disease that largely affects adults.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:SSSS did whole school testing yesterday (1/2) and, based on those results, is continuing with virtual for the week (Monday 1/3 was a scheduled virtual day). Return to in-person will be on Monday 1/10. There will be another whole school testing day on Thursday (1/5) to isolate any positive cases not caught by the 1/2 testing. Apparently, of the 1,214 people (students and staff) tested on 1/2, there were 135 positive results.
Sorry, that's SSSAS.
With an 11% positivity rate that seems like a reasonable approach, because this is measuring the entire school population, not a sample. The 20%+ numbers reported by state or local governments are based on a self-selected sample so they can't be directly compared to a measure of the entire population (the results reported by states are people who sought a test because they felt sick or were traveling and so can be expected to be higher in general). A second test on Thursday will help establish how much ongoing community spread there is.
I heard that over 100 students didn’t test. At least the test later in the week should catch cases from New Years celebrations
Over 100 kids missing the test is concerning. It might mean families are extending their vacations which could mess up the schools’s plan to get everyone back and tested. Hope these families have the decency to at least be back for the next round of testing since the school is doing everything they can.
Those kids were supposed to antigen test this morning before school (if in person). They canceled that because they are doing distance learning. No one was going to be let into the building without a test.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tests are missing a lot of Omnicron though
Even PCR? Do you have a source for this? If so, that’s concerning.
This fake news from the lamestream media
Uh, no diagnostic test is ironclad. You know this. One test will identify some, not all, on any given day. Just as it may misidentify some as positive. This is fact, not lamestream media.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tests are missing a lot of Omnicron though
Even PCR? Do you have a source for this? If so, that’s concerning.
This fake news from the lamestream media
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:why not just wait unto this 'wave' passes? I feel like a kid at the beach--when the big wave comes, we all know to dive under. Why not just stay home 2 weeks? I don't get it
Because we don't know when there will be another wave, we don't know 2 weeks are enough, we do know kids have sacrificed over and over again for a disease that largely affects adults.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tests are missing a lot of Omnicron though
Even PCR? Do you have a source for this? If so, that’s concerning.
This fake news from the lamestream media
Anonymous wrote:why not just wait unto this 'wave' passes? I feel like a kid at the beach--when the big wave comes, we all know to dive under. Why not just stay home 2 weeks? I don't get it
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tests are missing a lot of Omnicron though
Even PCR? Do you have a source for this? If so, that’s concerning.