The GOP are losing and panicking. This is why they’re trotting out the usual allegations:
questioning race,
questioning political label,
questioning military service,
bringing up gay and transgender issues

It’s a rerun. Yawn!

Harris and the Coach our filling venues bigly!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow the GOP are freaking out.

To the contrary Kamals played right into their hands by selecting a VP from a deep blue state

So why did Trump choose JD Vance from the deep red state of Ohio?
Or Trump choose Mike Pence from Indiana?
Or Biden choose Kamala Harris from California?

Actually, when was the last time someone from a swing state was chosen as the VP?

While VP candidates can certainly be a burden (JD, Palin, Quayle), their upside potential is limited.

Ohio isn’t deep red. It’s a swing state. Indiana went blue in 2008. It became deep red with time but Pence’s appeal was he helped with Christians who didn’t know like Trumps morals or crude language

disagree. It may not be deep red, but it's red.

https://www.270towin.com/states/ohio

WI, MI, PA are true swing states.

They’re all swing states now. NJ is a swing state.

I think the only solid East Coast state for the Dems is Maryland. I wouldn’t be surprised if PA, NJ, NY, VA, NH flips. People are tired of migrant takeovers and woke public school districts

Do you really think that OH won't vote for Trump/Vance? It may not be deep red, but it's red.

Walz is more Ohio than Vance. Vance sounds like a douchebag sleek phony from the coast. And Trump is losing it.

I'm not disagreeing with you about Vance, but I don't think OH is gonna be impressed with Walz enough to vote D.

Harris's selection of Walz has left the Republicans flatfooted. Trump and J.D. Vance expected to continue their posturing as champions of the common man, but on that front the credentials of a New York real estate developer who inherited millions of dollars and of a Yale-educated venture capitalist pale next to a Nebraska-born schoolteacher and football coach.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow the GOP are freaking out.

To the contrary Kamals played right into their hands by selecting a VP from a deep blue state

So why did Trump choose JD Vance from the deep red state of Ohio?
Or Trump choose Mike Pence from Indiana?
Or Biden choose Kamala Harris from California?

Actually, when was the last time someone from a swing state was chosen as the VP?

While VP candidates can certainly be a burden (JD, Palin, Quayle), their upside potential is limited.

Ohio isn’t deep red. It’s a swing state. Indiana went blue in 2008. It became deep red with time but Pence’s appeal was he helped with Christians who didn’t know like Trumps morals or crude language

disagree. It may not be deep red, but it's red.

https://www.270towin.com/states/ohio

WI, MI, PA are true swing states.

They’re all swing states now. NJ is a swing state.

I think the only solid East Coast state for the Dems is Maryland. I wouldn’t be surprised if PA, NJ, NY, VA, NH flips. People are tired of migrant takeovers and woke public school districts

Do you really think that OH won't vote for Trump/Vance? It may not be deep red, but it's red.

Walz is more Ohio than Vance. Vance sounds like a douchebag sleek phony from the coast. And Trump is losing it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow the GOP are freaking out.

To the contrary Kamals played right into their hands by selecting a VP from a deep blue state

So why did Trump choose JD Vance from the deep red state of Ohio?
Or Trump choose Mike Pence from Indiana?
Or Biden choose Kamala Harris from California?

Actually, when was the last time someone from a swing state was chosen as the VP?

While VP candidates can certainly be a burden (JD, Palin, Quayle), their upside potential is limited.

Even with Kaine, VA was close.

50-44 is not close.

Ah okay. I guess I didn't remember correctly.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow the GOP are freaking out.

To the contrary Kamals played right into their hands by selecting a VP from a deep blue state

So why did Trump choose JD Vance from the deep red state of Ohio?
Or Trump choose Mike Pence from Indiana?
Or Biden choose Kamala Harris from California?

Actually, when was the last time someone from a swing state was chosen as the VP?

While VP candidates can certainly be a burden (JD, Palin, Quayle), their upside potential is limited.

Even with Kaine, VA was close.

50-44 is not close.

Anonymous wrote:Indiana is now deep red

https://www.270towin.com/states/indiana

Indiana was always deep red. Obama winning it in 2008 was evidence of just how thoroughly McCain got his ass kicked. It went to LBJ in 1964. I think those are the only two Democratic wins in the state in the last 80+ years.

Anonymous wrote:Now they're trying to "Swift Boat" Walz. They got nothing.

+1

Indiana is now deep red

https://www.270towin.com/states/indiana

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow the GOP are freaking out.

To the contrary Kamals played right into their hands by selecting a VP from a deep blue state

So why did Trump choose JD Vance from the deep red state of Ohio?
Or Trump choose Mike Pence from Indiana?
Or Biden choose Kamala Harris from California?

Actually, when was the last time someone from a swing state was chosen as the VP?

While VP candidates can certainly be a burden (JD, Palin, Quayle), their upside potential is limited.

Ohio isn’t deep red. It’s a swing state. Indiana went blue in 2008. It became deep red with time but Pence’s appeal was he helped with Christians who didn’t know like Trumps morals or crude language

disagree. It may not be deep red, but it's red.

https://www.270towin.com/states/ohio

WI, MI, PA are true swing states.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow the GOP are freaking out.

To the contrary Kamals played right into their hands by selecting a VP from a deep blue state

So why did Trump choose JD Vance from the deep red state of Ohio?
Or Trump choose Mike Pence from Indiana?
Or Biden choose Kamala Harris from California?

Actually, when was the last time someone from a swing state was chosen as the VP?

While VP candidates can certainly be a burden (JD, Palin, Quayle), their upside potential is limited.

Even with Kaine, VA was close.

Va is flipping back this year

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow the GOP are freaking out.

To the contrary Kamals played right into their hands by selecting a VP from a deep blue state

So why did Trump choose JD Vance from the deep red state of Ohio?
Or Trump choose Mike Pence from Indiana?
Or Biden choose Kamala Harris from California?

Actually, when was the last time someone from a swing state was chosen as the VP?

While VP candidates can certainly be a burden (JD, Palin, Quayle), their upside potential is limited.

Ohio isn’t deep red. It’s a swing state. Indiana went blue in 2008. It became deep red with time but Pence’s appeal was he helped with Christians who didn’t know like Trumps morals or crude language

Anonymous wrote:

I'm one of those teachers!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow the GOP are freaking out.

To the contrary Kamals played right into their hands by selecting a VP from a deep blue state

So why did Trump choose JD Vance from the deep red state of Ohio?
Or Trump choose Mike Pence from Indiana?
Or Biden choose Kamala Harris from California?

Actually, when was the last time someone from a swing state was chosen as the VP?

While VP candidates can certainly be a burden (JD, Palin, Quayle), their upside potential is limited.

Paul Ryan, who didn’t deliver.