Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:We spent one year at Valor and decided to leave due to a multitude of reasons. Coach didn’t really care honestly and the feedback what terrible. I think maybe inexperience was huge factor. He missed practice sessions and tournaments. Late to start the practice for the most part where the kids were just running around.
There are some folks on here criticizing the parents that left, but we had our kid ID’d at a few other clubs. Needless to say we made it on a number 1 team in a equal division. Go figure. If the parents are happy playing in these lower team with zero expectations than good for them. To me it’s not worth the money. My kids performance has significantly improved just by interacting with better performing players.
Sounds like a bad coach, but just pointing out that none of Valor’s number 1 teams play in NCSL past U10 where the divisions aren’t numbered and scores are not kept. Like other clubs with ECNL-RL or ECNL, only the second and below teams play in NCSL from U11 on up. If you are in fact talking about a U9 or U10 team, I think there’s a lot of guessing and politics that go into placing kids on teams. Coaches get scared to move kids down because their parents can be a nightmare to deal with and/or they leave the club. Moving to a new club is almost necessary in order to move up in a lot of cases.
Agree. It was. The coach was very young and inexperienced. The leadership was largely culpable as well for the training and monitoring of the staff.
Among other issues: communication needed major work; there was minimal encouragement or guidance given to the team; most of the kids were pigeon-holed in positions with little rotation; with the misplaced recognition and observations of some preferential treatment for certain players/parents… that was ultimately the end of it.
We did see about half of the folks move on to other clubs and get on significantly better teams.
Of the few parents that decided to stay, roll the dice for 2nd or even 3rd year had not advanced. This was due to a lot of what you had mentioned. Some were fine because they had really little expectation. A good 90% of the kids were just re-phased into the same team for the next year.
With all these issues, there was no value or opportunity in awarding another commitment.
Overall, the team demonstrated very little improvement. We had vastly more losses than wins 1/4. Fundamentally, the weaknesses in technical performance on the team needed major work: slow acceleration, speed and endurance were an important factor; defensively, it was very poor; half the kids didn’t hustle and waited for the ball a lot of times. You could see this as passive coaching or internal to the player’s commitment on the field.
To sum it up, our experience here was terrible. Since then, being on a Pre-Academy team has been great. The coach, parents and players are all committed. There is a high level of expectation and performance already present. It’s been such a day and night transformation.