Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:WSJ today

“Project 2025 Has a Radical Agenda for Trump. He Has Other Plans.“

As former President Donald Trump prepares to accept the Republican nomination, he has suggested he has no interest in using the trove of planning work assembled by Project 2025 and other outside groups that have spent years preparing for his return to the White House. Trump has privately expressed annoyance that Project 2025 has received so much attention, and he resents the notion that the group is ghostwriting his policies and choosing candidates to fill the top ranks of his administration, according to associates. Those frustrations boiled over last week when Trump distanced himself from the group. “I know nothing about Project 2025,” he said, adding that some of its recommendations are “absolutely ridiculous.”

While Trump’s decision to criticize Project 2025 was politically expedient, people close to the former president said he has at times been genuinely frustrated with the group. His ire centers on two issues: He believes that outside groups like Project 2025 are raising money using his name and he thinks they are overstepping by gathering names for high-profile cabinet positions.

This will be ignored.

Project 2025 and abortion is all the Democrats have at this point.
They certainly cannot run on their agenda.

+100
This whole thread is a joke of LWNJs desperately using anything they hope will stick, regardless of whether it’s true or not. They’re assuming no one will call out their lies. Project 2025 is not Trump’s agenda, but they sure seem to want it to be.
DP

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They would dismantle NOAA: https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2024/07/noaa-project-2025-weather/678987/?gift=ADN5ex8W_PaQmR-s5dSx2Do21FXUbb4d2XVoxOY40Vw

WTF is wrong with these people?

Much like Trump extending a hurricane with a sharpie, they think if NOAA isn’t there to mention icky words like “climate change,” then we won’t notice people boiling in multiple US regions. See? Magic!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Project 2025 would change the 40hr workweek to a 160hr work-month, so your boss could make you work extra hours with no overtime pay by cutting your hours later in the month.

See page 592.

That’s awesome. You fxckers will be salary employees.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They would dismantle NOAA: https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2024/07/noaa-project-2025-weather/678987/?gift=ADN5ex8W_PaQmR-s5dSx2Do21FXUbb4d2XVoxOY40Vw

WTF is wrong with these people?

Anonymous wrote:Project 2025 would change the 40hr workweek to a 160hr work-month, so your boss could make you work extra hours with no overtime pay by cutting your hours later in the month.

See page 592.

Anonymous wrote:Project 2025 would change the 40hr workweek to a 160hr work-month, so your boss could make you work extra hours with no overtime pay by cutting your hours later in the month.

See page 592.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They want to ban pornography. But, then who will Trump have sex with?

They want to ban pornography, yet Trump slept with a porn star and the GOP hosted a different one as the opening night keynote speaker.

Go figure.

Anonymous wrote:They want to ban pornography. But, then who will Trump have sex with?

Anonymous wrote:They would dismantle NOAA: https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2024/07/noaa-project-2025-weather/678987/?gift=ADN5ex8W_PaQmR-s5dSx2Do21FXUbb4d2XVoxOY40Vw