Anonymous wrote:Most public school teams have 2-3 standout players and most publics have a wide variety of talent, as you get what you get when you inherit them. Coaches can coach their players within the rules, but at the end of the day, sometimes not all players respond or enhance their skills over the years as most are not dedicated to the game because they have so many other things going on. What I'm saying is, I do agree with other posters here that publics probably have 2-3 kids that can play, but i wouldn't be too quick to blame the coaches. Yes, I do agree that coaches need to coach and lead by example, etc... Not making excuses for any coach or player, just pointing out the fact that within public school lax in NOVA, you are sometimes limited in terms of resources, player dedication, coaching knowledge, etc... So if parents think they are going to see UNC type caliber lacrosse, they need to be more realistic.
Great point. Public School coaches are often limited to 2 standout players if they are lucky. But the upper teams competing for a state title also have some very skilled complementary players committed to play at the college level. Some coaches use these players and play more of a team offense while other coaches rely only on their stand-out players running isos and two man games. Past champions Langley and Yorktown are great examples of a couple elite standout players but solid supporting cast and all played a team game. The standout players often had more assist than goals. This is what makes Battlefield a threat.