Anonymous
06/18/2026 17:39
Subject: Travis Kelce and Taylor Swift engaged!
She has Peter Pan Syndrome, like most child stars. See also Michael Jackson.
She's not an erudite and educated grown woman, she's a creepy perpetual teenager stuck in the 9th grade.
She's not an erudite and educated grown woman, she's a creepy perpetual teenager stuck in the 9th grade.
Anonymous
06/18/2026 17:31
Subject: Travis Kelce and Taylor Swift engaged!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She is a total media creation. She's basically a theater girl. She can't dance, she doesn't actually write all of her own music, she can't play instruments. She is a boring lanky creepy weirdo who chased teen boys when she was like 25 years old. Her entire life is fake. I doubt she even realizes what's real and what's fake at this point.
Yeah. I was shocked and grossed out when I learned she was dating a 17 yo while in her 20s.
She was so thirsty to be a Kennedy.
He was 18 and she was 22. Big deal.
DP. It is a big deal. Fresh out high school versus college or university. Plus males are still developing their brains so he was probably more like a 16 year old or younger.
We don’t bat an eye if guys do this. Jerry Seinfeld anyone? Anthony Keidis? Steven Tyler? Every rockstar that has ever lived and most actors and most wealthy men?
Taylor was probably very inexperienced and innocent at 22. The Kennedy boy probably had many girls by 17.
I have a lot of problems with Taylor but this seems silly.
A lot of us absolutely "bat an eye" when men do this. I don't think 22/18 is as bad as what the men you list did but I am not particularly persuaded by the argument that we should give a woman a pass for doing exploitative things men have been doing forever.
It also think it's interesting you assume Taylor was "inexperienced and innocent" at 22 (when she'd been an international pop star for 8 years) but that a teenage Kennedy must have "had many girls" at 17. First of all, even if the teenager was very sexually experienced, does that make it okay? If a teenage girl at 17 had a lot of sexual experiences, and then dated a famous musician in his 20s, would you think "oh, makes sense, she's so experienced"? I wouldn't, it would trouble me.
And second, I think you imputing the quality of innocence to the woman because of stereotypes about women, and the quality of knowledge/control to the teenage boy because of stereotypes about men. All so you can ignore the truth which is that she was more powerful than he was in that relationship, and he was not yet a man.
This is what Taylor has built her empire on. Giving women a pass for doing exploitative things in the name of “equality.” It isn’t equality if you are still squashing other people.
Anonymous
06/18/2026 17:14
Subject: Travis Kelce and Taylor Swift engaged!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Jerry Seinfeld was 22?
Dude. What college senior or first year law student at age 22 and 23 is dating high schoolers? It’s beyond creepy.
So it's your contention that dating a 17 year old at ages 38 vs. 22 are exactly the same?
Yes. Both super creepy. She was 23 btw
No, she wasn’t. They dated the summer of 2012. She was born in December 1989 and he was born in July 1994.
He would’ve been turning 18 that summer, she didn’t turn 23 until December after they had broken up.
I like how you consolidated their relationship AND her psychotic creepy ass buying a house next to his family’s into a perfect window of the couple months when he was 18 years old and she was 22. You Swifties are legitimately batshit.
Tell me how I’m wrong. Was Taylor not born in December 1989, was he not born July 1994? Did they not date summer of 2012? She was not 23.
I’m not a Swifty I just like to deal in facts. If it helps you sleep at night to think that she was 23 and he was 17 or she was 24 and he was 16 do so. I love that Taylor is living rent free in your head and you’re fretting over this relationship that ended 14 years ago.
Anonymous
06/18/2026 17:10
Subject: Travis Kelce and Taylor Swift engaged!
LOL at thinking 22 makes you a "grown ass" anything, male or female.
Anonymous
06/18/2026 17:07
Subject: Travis Kelce and Taylor Swift engaged!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She is a total media creation. She's basically a theater girl. She can't dance, she doesn't actually write all of her own music, she can't play instruments. She is a boring lanky creepy weirdo who chased teen boys when she was like 25 years old. Her entire life is fake. I doubt she even realizes what's real and what's fake at this point.
Yeah. I was shocked and grossed out when I learned she was dating a 17 yo while in her 20s.
She was so thirsty to be a Kennedy.
He was 18 and she was 22. Big deal.
DP. It is a big deal. Fresh out high school versus college or university. Plus males are still developing their brains so he was probably more like a 16 year old or younger.
We don’t bat an eye if guys do this. Jerry Seinfeld anyone? Anthony Keidis? Steven Tyler? Every rockstar that has ever lived and most actors and most wealthy men?
Taylor was probably very inexperienced and innocent at 22. The Kennedy boy probably had many girls by 17.
I have a lot of problems with Taylor but this seems silly.
Jerry Seinfeld is viral every other week for being a predatory creep with a high school girlfriend he “met in the park.”
+1
And let us not forget that Taylor bought a $5M house to be near the Kennedys. lol
Something is not right with that girl.
It proves what a fake charade this Kelce thing is. She’s repelled every pretty boy she’s ever really wanted, so now at her advanced age she has to settle for this ugly thirsty buffoon. Slumming it. Their wedding will be “viral” and forced down everyone’s throats for a day and then nobody will care. There’s nothing romantic or aspirational about being obnoxious, thirsty for attention middle aged people getting married. If she could have lured Harry Styles down the aisle, sure, aspiration. Travis Kelce? LMAO. No just no.
Anonymous
06/18/2026 17:02
Subject: Travis Kelce and Taylor Swift engaged!
Swift was a grown ass woman chasing around a high school BOY.
Anonymous
06/18/2026 17:01
Subject: Travis Kelce and Taylor Swift engaged!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Jerry Seinfeld was 22?
Dude. What college senior or first year law student at age 22 and 23 is dating high schoolers? It’s beyond creepy.
So it's your contention that dating a 17 year old at ages 38 vs. 22 are exactly the same?
Yes. Both super creepy. She was 23 btw
No, she wasn’t. They dated the summer of 2012. She was born in December 1989 and he was born in July 1994.
He would’ve been turning 18 that summer, she didn’t turn 23 until December after they had broken up.
I like how you consolidated their relationship AND her psychotic creepy ass buying a house next to his family’s into a perfect window of the couple months when he was 18 years old and she was 22. You Swifties are legitimately batshit.
Anonymous
06/18/2026 16:57
Subject: Travis Kelce and Taylor Swift engaged!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She is a total media creation. She's basically a theater girl. She can't dance, she doesn't actually write all of her own music, she can't play instruments. She is a boring lanky creepy weirdo who chased teen boys when she was like 25 years old. Her entire life is fake. I doubt she even realizes what's real and what's fake at this point.
Yeah. I was shocked and grossed out when I learned she was dating a 17 yo while in her 20s.
She was so thirsty to be a Kennedy.
He was 18 and she was 22. Big deal.
DP. It is a big deal. Fresh out high school versus college or university. Plus males are still developing their brains so he was probably more like a 16 year old or younger.
We don’t bat an eye if guys do this. Jerry Seinfeld anyone? Anthony Keidis? Steven Tyler? Every rockstar that has ever lived and most actors and most wealthy men?
Taylor was probably very inexperienced and innocent at 22. The Kennedy boy probably had many girls by 17.
I have a lot of problems with Taylor but this seems silly.
A lot of us absolutely "bat an eye" when men do this. I don't think 22/18 is as bad as what the men you list did but I am not particularly persuaded by the argument that we should give a woman a pass for doing exploitative things men have been doing forever.
It also think it's interesting you assume Taylor was "inexperienced and innocent" at 22 (when she'd been an international pop star for 8 years) but that a teenage Kennedy must have "had many girls" at 17. First of all, even if the teenager was very sexually experienced, does that make it okay? If a teenage girl at 17 had a lot of sexual experiences, and then dated a famous musician in his 20s, would you think "oh, makes sense, she's so experienced"? I wouldn't, it would trouble me.
And second, I think you imputing the quality of innocence to the woman because of stereotypes about women, and the quality of knowledge/control to the teenage boy because of stereotypes about men. All so you can ignore the truth which is that she was more powerful than he was in that relationship, and he was not yet a man.
Well said. +1
Creepy how that poster was excusing T's behavior.
What is creepy is people trying to make this sound worse than it was… “He was 17!” Actually he turned 18. “She was 23!” No she wasn’t. They had a broken up months before she turned 23. You have to exaggerate the fact, so it sounds worse cause it’s really not that bad.
This happened in 2012. But stay mad.
Anonymous
06/18/2026 16:56
Subject: Travis Kelce and Taylor Swift engaged!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She is a total media creation. She's basically a theater girl. She can't dance, she doesn't actually write all of her own music, she can't play instruments. She is a boring lanky creepy weirdo who chased teen boys when she was like 25 years old. Her entire life is fake. I doubt she even realizes what's real and what's fake at this point.
Yeah. I was shocked and grossed out when I learned she was dating a 17 yo while in her 20s.
She was so thirsty to be a Kennedy.
He was 18 and she was 22. Big deal.
DP. It is a big deal. Fresh out high school versus college or university. Plus males are still developing their brains so he was probably more like a 16 year old or younger.
We don’t bat an eye if guys do this. Jerry Seinfeld anyone? Anthony Keidis? Steven Tyler? Every rockstar that has ever lived and most actors and most wealthy men?
Taylor was probably very inexperienced and innocent at 22. The Kennedy boy probably had many girls by 17.
I have a lot of problems with Taylor but this seems silly.
Jerry Seinfeld is viral every other week for being a predatory creep with a high school girlfriend he “met in the park.”
+1
And let us not forget that Taylor bought a $5M house to be near the Kennedys. lol
Something is not right with that girl.
Are you sure you're ok?
Anonymous
06/18/2026 16:53
Subject: Travis Kelce and Taylor Swift engaged!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She is a total media creation. She's basically a theater girl. She can't dance, she doesn't actually write all of her own music, she can't play instruments. She is a boring lanky creepy weirdo who chased teen boys when she was like 25 years old. Her entire life is fake. I doubt she even realizes what's real and what's fake at this point.
Yeah. I was shocked and grossed out when I learned she was dating a 17 yo while in her 20s.
She was so thirsty to be a Kennedy.
He was 18 and she was 22. Big deal.
DP. It is a big deal. Fresh out high school versus college or university. Plus males are still developing their brains so he was probably more like a 16 year old or younger.
We don’t bat an eye if guys do this. Jerry Seinfeld anyone? Anthony Keidis? Steven Tyler? Every rockstar that has ever lived and most actors and most wealthy men?
Taylor was probably very inexperienced and innocent at 22. The Kennedy boy probably had many girls by 17.
I have a lot of problems with Taylor but this seems silly.
Jerry Seinfeld is viral every other week for being a predatory creep with a high school girlfriend he “met in the park.”
+1
And let us not forget that Taylor bought a $5M house to be near the Kennedys. lol
Something is not right with that girl.
Anonymous
06/18/2026 16:51
Subject: Travis Kelce and Taylor Swift engaged!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She is a total media creation. She's basically a theater girl. She can't dance, she doesn't actually write all of her own music, she can't play instruments. She is a boring lanky creepy weirdo who chased teen boys when she was like 25 years old. Her entire life is fake. I doubt she even realizes what's real and what's fake at this point.
Yeah. I was shocked and grossed out when I learned she was dating a 17 yo while in her 20s.
She was so thirsty to be a Kennedy.
He was 18 and she was 22. Big deal.
DP. It is a big deal. Fresh out high school versus college or university. Plus males are still developing their brains so he was probably more like a 16 year old or younger.
We don’t bat an eye if guys do this. Jerry Seinfeld anyone? Anthony Keidis? Steven Tyler? Every rockstar that has ever lived and most actors and most wealthy men?
Taylor was probably very inexperienced and innocent at 22. The Kennedy boy probably had many girls by 17.
I have a lot of problems with Taylor but this seems silly.
A lot of us absolutely "bat an eye" when men do this. I don't think 22/18 is as bad as what the men you list did but I am not particularly persuaded by the argument that we should give a woman a pass for doing exploitative things men have been doing forever.
It also think it's interesting you assume Taylor was "inexperienced and innocent" at 22 (when she'd been an international pop star for 8 years) but that a teenage Kennedy must have "had many girls" at 17. First of all, even if the teenager was very sexually experienced, does that make it okay? If a teenage girl at 17 had a lot of sexual experiences, and then dated a famous musician in his 20s, would you think "oh, makes sense, she's so experienced"? I wouldn't, it would trouble me.
And second, I think you imputing the quality of innocence to the woman because of stereotypes about women, and the quality of knowledge/control to the teenage boy because of stereotypes about men. All so you can ignore the truth which is that she was more powerful than he was in that relationship, and he was not yet a man.
Well said. +1
Creepy how that poster was excusing T's behavior.
Who cares about a perfectly legal relationship that happened well over a decade ago. You really need some real life problems.
Anonymous
06/18/2026 16:50
Subject: Travis Kelce and Taylor Swift engaged!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Jerry Seinfeld was 22?
Dude. What college senior or first year law student at age 22 and 23 is dating high schoolers? It’s beyond creepy.
So it's your contention that dating a 17 year old at ages 38 vs. 22 are exactly the same?
Yes. Both super creepy. She was 23 btw
No, she wasn’t. They dated the summer of 2012. She was born in December 1989 and he was born in July 1994.
He would’ve been turning 18 that summer, she didn’t turn 23 until December after they had broken up.
Anonymous
06/18/2026 16:48
Subject: Travis Kelce and Taylor Swift engaged!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She is a total media creation. She's basically a theater girl. She can't dance, she doesn't actually write all of her own music, she can't play instruments. She is a boring lanky creepy weirdo who chased teen boys when she was like 25 years old. Her entire life is fake. I doubt she even realizes what's real and what's fake at this point.
Yeah. I was shocked and grossed out when I learned she was dating a 17 yo while in her 20s.
She was so thirsty to be a Kennedy.
He was 18 and she was 22. Big deal.
DP. It is a big deal. Fresh out high school versus college or university. Plus males are still developing their brains so he was probably more like a 16 year old or younger.
We don’t bat an eye if guys do this. Jerry Seinfeld anyone? Anthony Keidis? Steven Tyler? Every rockstar that has ever lived and most actors and most wealthy men?
Taylor was probably very inexperienced and innocent at 22. The Kennedy boy probably had many girls by 17.
I have a lot of problems with Taylor but this seems silly.
A lot of us absolutely "bat an eye" when men do this. I don't think 22/18 is as bad as what the men you list did but I am not particularly persuaded by the argument that we should give a woman a pass for doing exploitative things men have been doing forever.
It also think it's interesting you assume Taylor was "inexperienced and innocent" at 22 (when she'd been an international pop star for 8 years) but that a teenage Kennedy must have "had many girls" at 17. First of all, even if the teenager was very sexually experienced, does that make it okay? If a teenage girl at 17 had a lot of sexual experiences, and then dated a famous musician in his 20s, would you think "oh, makes sense, she's so experienced"? I wouldn't, it would trouble me.
And second, I think you imputing the quality of innocence to the woman because of stereotypes about women, and the quality of knowledge/control to the teenage boy because of stereotypes about men. All so you can ignore the truth which is that she was more powerful than he was in that relationship, and he was not yet a man.
Well said. +1
Creepy how that poster was excusing T's behavior.
Anonymous
06/18/2026 16:44
Subject: Travis Kelce and Taylor Swift engaged!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She is a total media creation. She's basically a theater girl. She can't dance, she doesn't actually write all of her own music, she can't play instruments. She is a boring lanky creepy weirdo who chased teen boys when she was like 25 years old. Her entire life is fake. I doubt she even realizes what's real and what's fake at this point.
Yeah. I was shocked and grossed out when I learned she was dating a 17 yo while in her 20s.
She was so thirsty to be a Kennedy.
He was 18 and she was 22. Big deal.
DP. It is a big deal. Fresh out high school versus college or university. Plus males are still developing their brains so he was probably more like a 16 year old or younger.
We don’t bat an eye if guys do this. Jerry Seinfeld anyone? Anthony Keidis? Steven Tyler? Every rockstar that has ever lived and most actors and most wealthy men?
Taylor was probably very inexperienced and innocent at 22. The Kennedy boy probably had many girls by 17.
I have a lot of problems with Taylor but this seems silly.
A lot of us absolutely "bat an eye" when men do this. I don't think 22/18 is as bad as what the men you list did but I am not particularly persuaded by the argument that we should give a woman a pass for doing exploitative things men have been doing forever.
It also think it's interesting you assume Taylor was "inexperienced and innocent" at 22 (when she'd been an international pop star for 8 years) but that a teenage Kennedy must have "had many girls" at 17. First of all, even if the teenager was very sexually experienced, does that make it okay? If a teenage girl at 17 had a lot of sexual experiences, and then dated a famous musician in his 20s, would you think "oh, makes sense, she's so experienced"? I wouldn't, it would trouble me.
And second, I think you imputing the quality of innocence to the woman because of stereotypes about women, and the quality of knowledge/control to the teenage boy because of stereotypes about men. All so you can ignore the truth which is that she was more powerful than he was in that relationship, and he was not yet a man.
DP. Understand what you’re saying but I think you’re making the Kennedy boy seem a bit doe eyed. When I was 23, a family friend I knew was absolutely enamored with me and tried to pursue me. He is four years younger than I am. I was dating someone else, but I remember thinking about the age gap and not being too concerned about it. I was more concerned that I was more mature than he was and would be looking for something more serious than I was about corrupting him.
Makes it sound like this Kennedy boy was 12! I was a total emotional idiot at 22. Not much more mature than I was at 18
Anonymous
06/18/2026 15:38
Subject: Travis Kelce and Taylor Swift engaged!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She is a total media creation. She's basically a theater girl. She can't dance, she doesn't actually write all of her own music, she can't play instruments. She is a boring lanky creepy weirdo who chased teen boys when she was like 25 years old. Her entire life is fake. I doubt she even realizes what's real and what's fake at this point.
Yeah. I was shocked and grossed out when I learned she was dating a 17 yo while in her 20s.
She was so thirsty to be a Kennedy.
He was 18 and she was 22. Big deal.
DP. It is a big deal. Fresh out high school versus college or university. Plus males are still developing their brains so he was probably more like a 16 year old or younger.
We don’t bat an eye if guys do this. Jerry Seinfeld anyone? Anthony Keidis? Steven Tyler? Every rockstar that has ever lived and most actors and most wealthy men?
Taylor was probably very inexperienced and innocent at 22. The Kennedy boy probably had many girls by 17.
I have a lot of problems with Taylor but this seems silly.
A lot of us absolutely "bat an eye" when men do this. I don't think 22/18 is as bad as what the men you list did but I am not particularly persuaded by the argument that we should give a woman a pass for doing exploitative things men have been doing forever.
It also think it's interesting you assume Taylor was "inexperienced and innocent" at 22 (when she'd been an international pop star for 8 years) but that a teenage Kennedy must have "had many girls" at 17. First of all, even if the teenager was very sexually experienced, does that make it okay? If a teenage girl at 17 had a lot of sexual experiences, and then dated a famous musician in his 20s, would you think "oh, makes sense, she's so experienced"? I wouldn't, it would trouble me.
And second, I think you imputing the quality of innocence to the woman because of stereotypes about women, and the quality of knowledge/control to the teenage boy because of stereotypes about men. All so you can ignore the truth which is that she was more powerful than he was in that relationship, and he was not yet a man.