Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Fun fact: starting goalie at SR overtook starting position of NCS goalie in club (MDDC) in MS. NCS goalie went to Cap, she stayed at SR. I think it’s safe to say the SR goalie is superior. But both are good, not knocking on NCS/Cap Blue goalie at all.
For that reason, it would be fun to see a match up unless this bullish goalie takes the SR spot.
The only thing about this take is that mnddc is known for having minimal specialized goalie coaching, with the exception of one of the former 29’ coaches and another one. Plus the rep of the SR goalie coach is also unsteady. She’s a great goalie but has no opportunity to improve if she doesn’t get specialized coaching, which we all know the dad won’t get.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Fun fact: starting goalie at SR overtook starting position of NCS goalie in club (MDDC) in MS. NCS goalie went to Cap, she stayed at SR. I think it’s safe to say the SR goalie is superior. But both are good, not knocking on NCS/Cap Blue goalie at all.
For that reason, it would be fun to see a match up unless this bullish goalie takes the SR spot.
The only thing about this take is that mnddc is known for having minimal specialized goalie coaching, with the exception of one of the former 29’ coaches and another one. Plus the rep of the SR goalie coach is also unsteady. She’s a great goalie but has no opportunity to improve if she doesn’t get specialized coaching, which we all know the dad won’t get.
When does a club do specialized training for any position. That’s what goaliesmith is for
Anonymous wrote:Standings updated.
1. GC
2. PVI
So it's a 3-way tie for 3rd. That's really all that matters wise because 4th and 5th have to play each other anyway and then GC in the semi. Although home field will be interesting. 3rd will get O'Connell and the knowledge of avoiding GC until the championship.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is it possible that SJC might not be too upset about a loss against BI because it positions then better for playoffs? I am just making crap up here because the loss does not make sense to me.
A doubt anyone is purposely trying to lose for seedlings. At some point they will have to run into GC and it will all end.
Anonymous wrote:Is it possible that SJC might not be too upset about a loss against BI because it positions then better for playoffs? I am just making crap up here because the loss does not make sense to me.
Anonymous wrote:What does BI beating SJC change for the wcac standings?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Fun fact: starting goalie at SR overtook starting position of NCS goalie in club (MDDC) in MS. NCS goalie went to Cap, she stayed at SR. I think it’s safe to say the SR goalie is superior. But both are good, not knocking on NCS/Cap Blue goalie at all.
For that reason, it would be fun to see a match up unless this bullish goalie takes the SR spot.
The only thing about this take is that mnddc is known for having minimal specialized goalie coaching, with the exception of one of the former 29’ coaches and another one. Plus the rep of the SR goalie coach is also unsteady. She’s a great goalie but has no opportunity to improve if she doesn’t get specialized coaching, which we all know the dad won’t get.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:BI over SJC 10-9 Final.
Say what?
Is the St. John's HC really coaching with a baby strapped to her chest? Is she a single mom?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:BI over SJC 10-9 Final.
Say what?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:BI over SJC 10-9 Final.
Congrats to BI, but WTF happened to SJC?
Can we please stay on freshman goalie topic?????
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:BI over SJC 10-9 Final.
Congrats to BI, but WTF happened to SJC?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:BI over SJC 10-9 Final.
Congrats to BI, but WTF happened to SJC?