Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Democrats will never hold the (majority-Democrat) college lobby accountable for any reform that would lead to lower SL debt.
To the contrary, the Obama administration spent years battling Republicans to try to reign in the worst colleges selling useless degrees. They enacted a regulation called the gainful employment rule that would have disqualified colleges from eligibility for federal student aid if large numbers of their graduates fail to land good jobs that would allow them to repay their debts. Obama also revoked recognition of one of the worst accrediting bodies. The Trump administration then scrapped the regs and recognized that accrediting body, letting those colleges go right back to selling useless degrees funded by federal loans. But I don't want to confuse you with facts.
Most non-profit colleges are no better than for-profit ones.
This is very true. Many "nonprofit" private colleges are total scams; nonprofit does not confer charitable mission by any means. And frankly, 2-year community colleges and regional 4-year public universities are not much better. Community colleges have <25% completion rates and most regional 4-years have <50% completion rates. Every year these local colleges soak thousands of poor students with debt who NEVER graduate. At least if you have a degree you qualify for a half-decent career. No degree plus loans is a financial grave for poor young adults.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So... we shouldn't bail poor students out, but we SHOULD bail out banks for venture capital...
Got it.
They’re not poor.
Rich people’s money is important.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Democrats will never hold the (majority-Democrat) college lobby accountable for any reform that would lead to lower SL debt.
To the contrary, the Obama administration spent years battling Republicans to try to reign in the worst colleges selling useless degrees. They enacted a regulation called the gainful employment rule that would have disqualified colleges from eligibility for federal student aid if large numbers of their graduates fail to land good jobs that would allow them to repay their debts. Obama also revoked recognition of one of the worst accrediting bodies. The Trump administration then scrapped the regs and recognized that accrediting body, letting those colleges go right back to selling useless degrees funded by federal loans. But I don't want to confuse you with facts.
Most non-profit colleges are no better than for-profit ones.
This is very true. Many "nonprofit" private colleges are total scams; nonprofit does not confer charitable mission by any means. And frankly, 2-year community colleges and regional 4-year public universities are not much better. Community colleges have <25% completion rates and most regional 4-years have <50% completion rates. Every year these local colleges soak thousands of poor students with debt who NEVER graduate. At least if you have a degree you qualify for a half-decent career. No degree plus loans is a financial grave for poor young adults.
For profit schools enroll 10% of students but have 50% of student loan defaults. But again, I don't want to confuse you guys with facts.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So... we shouldn't bail poor students out, but we SHOULD bail out banks for venture capital...
Got it.
They’re not poor.
Rich people’s money is important.
Rich student loan borrowers like MBA grads, lawyers, doctors and people who recently finished undergrad who are working on Wall Street.
You are a low-information troll. "Rich"? You have to make less than $125,000 to qualify for the $10,000 loan forgiveness. To qualify for the $20,000 loan forgiveness, you have to make less than $125,000 and had to be a poor college kid who qualified for Federal Pell Grants (less than $50,000 HHI during undergrad?). And also, most qualified forgiveness applicants do not have $10,000 or $20,000 in outstanding loans, so they would receive far less forgiveness than the caps.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So... we shouldn't bail poor students out, but we SHOULD bail out banks for venture capital...
Got it.
They’re not poor.
Rich people’s money is important.
Rich student loan borrowers like MBA grads, lawyers, doctors and people who recently finished undergrad who are working on Wall Street.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Democrats will never hold the (majority-Democrat) college lobby accountable for any reform that would lead to lower SL debt.
To the contrary, the Obama administration spent years battling Republicans to try to reign in the worst colleges selling useless degrees. They enacted a regulation called the gainful employment rule that would have disqualified colleges from eligibility for federal student aid if large numbers of their graduates fail to land good jobs that would allow them to repay their debts. Obama also revoked recognition of one of the worst accrediting bodies. The Trump administration then scrapped the regs and recognized that accrediting body, letting those colleges go right back to selling useless degrees funded by federal loans. But I don't want to confuse you with facts.
Most non-profit colleges are no better than for-profit ones.
This is very true. Many "nonprofit" private colleges are total scams; nonprofit does not confer charitable mission by any means. And frankly, 2-year community colleges and regional 4-year public universities are not much better. Community colleges have <25% completion rates and most regional 4-years have <50% completion rates. Every year these local colleges soak thousands of poor students with debt who NEVER graduate. At least if you have a degree you qualify for a half-decent career. No degree plus loans is a financial grave for poor young adults.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Democrats will never hold the (majority-Democrat) college lobby accountable for any reform that would lead to lower SL debt.
To the contrary, the Obama administration spent years battling Republicans to try to reign in the worst colleges selling useless degrees. They enacted a regulation called the gainful employment rule that would have disqualified colleges from eligibility for federal student aid if large numbers of their graduates fail to land good jobs that would allow them to repay their debts. Obama also revoked recognition of one of the worst accrediting bodies. The Trump administration then scrapped the regs and recognized that accrediting body, letting those colleges go right back to selling useless degrees funded by federal loans. But I don't want to confuse you with facts.
Most non-profit colleges are no better than for-profit ones.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So... we shouldn't bail poor students out, but we SHOULD bail out banks for venture capital...
Got it.
They’re not poor.
Rich people’s money is important.
Rich student loan borrowers like MBA grads, lawyers, doctors and people who recently finished undergrad who are working on Wall Street.
Anonymous wrote:So... we shouldn't bail poor students out, but we SHOULD bail out banks for venture capital...
Got it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Democrats will never hold the (majority-Democrat) college lobby accountable for any reform that would lead to lower SL debt.
To the contrary, the Obama administration spent years battling Republicans to try to reign in the worst colleges selling useless degrees. They enacted a regulation called the gainful employment rule that would have disqualified colleges from eligibility for federal student aid if large numbers of their graduates fail to land good jobs that would allow them to repay their debts. Obama also revoked recognition of one of the worst accrediting bodies. The Trump administration then scrapped the regs and recognized that accrediting body, letting those colleges go right back to selling useless degrees funded by federal loans. But I don't want to confuse you with facts.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So... we shouldn't bail poor students out, but we SHOULD bail out banks for venture capital...
Got it.
They’re not poor.
Rich people’s money is important.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So... we shouldn't bail poor students out, but we SHOULD bail out banks for venture capital...
Got it.
They’re not poor.
Anonymous wrote:Democrats will never hold the (majority-Democrat) college lobby accountable for any reform that would lead to lower SL debt.
Anonymous wrote:So... we shouldn't bail poor students out, but we SHOULD bail out banks for venture capital...
Got it.