Anonymous
08/10/2022 23:58
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
The bad news is that idiots like this make laws
[twitter]https://twitter.com/sltrib/status/1557480043345059840?s=21&t=2MQFGRitwXmSqa9quUhhIg[/twitter
[twitter]https://twitter.com/sltrib/status/1557480043345059840?s=21&t=2MQFGRitwXmSqa9quUhhIg[/twitter
Anonymous
Anonymous
08/07/2022 08:26
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Today in totally predictable outcomes:
A challenge for antiabortion states
Doctors reluctant to work there: Recruiters say OB/GYNs are turning down offers, a warning for conservative-dominated states already experiencing shortages
Link with no paywall
https://wapo.st/3Sw59PS
Good luck red states. Maybe you can go back to the 1800s and just call the midwife to your house whenever you’re ready to give birth. I for one look forward to all the OB/GYNs moving to blue states where they will be most welcome.
Anonymous
08/07/2022 08:09
Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:
Prosecutors don't have medical training, are they not going to trust doctors to do their best
I can understand a doctor's decision being reviewed by another doctor, but a prosecutor who hasn't studied medicine
Why would it need review at all. It's not like we have thousands of extra doctors sitting around doing nothing all day, while the medical system just zips along quickly and efficiently. Do you want to add another layer of bureaucracy - and, frankly, tyranny - to your medical care?
Given that there are increasingly strict time limits for when an abortion is even legal, where it is even legal, do you think adding more time and bureaucracy is a good idea? Is that good for this life you are trying to protect, allegedly seeking to protect, either?
Anonymous
08/06/2022 23:36
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think either every woman who gets pregnant gets a guaranteed income provided by the MAN who impregnated her directly deposited into her account from his employer (or collected monthly by the state and given to her) until the child is 18 (at a cost determined by economy of what it costs to raise a child for 1 year of life) OR a lump sum pay out of $250,000 that she can use to care for that child over the 18 years.
if hte man can't afford either, then he is automatically given a vasectomy and can not reproduce until his debts are paid in full.
The woman is gets free health insurance while pregnant at his cost adn his child will have health insurance until the age of 18 for which he must either pay 1/2 the cost of directly to the insurance company (ideally single payer healthcare).
Just ignore the fact that the man might have impregnated her believing her when she assured him that she couldn't get pregnant.
She couldn't get pregnant if he kept it in his pants, right?
Don't do the crime if you can't do the time.
Anonymous
08/06/2022 23:13
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Today in totally predictable outcomes:
A challenge for antiabortion states
Doctors reluctant to work there: Recruiters say OB/GYNs are turning down offers, a warning for conservative-dominated states already experiencing shortages
Link with no paywall
https://wapo.st/3Sw59PS
A challenge for antiabortion states
Doctors reluctant to work there: Recruiters say OB/GYNs are turning down offers, a warning for conservative-dominated states already experiencing shortages
Link with no paywall
https://wapo.st/3Sw59PS
Anonymous
Anonymous
08/06/2022 04:14
Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Prosecutors don't have medical training, are they not going to trust doctors to do their best
I can understand a doctor's decision being reviewed by another doctor, but a prosecutor who hasn't studied medicine
Anonymous
Anonymous
08/06/2022 00:18
Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Finally, after the suctioning of 63 million growing babies
Abortion won't stop. It will just be the rich that get it.
Guess Mississippi will limit abortions to 15 weeks pregnant and under.
That’s 96% of abortions anyhow and still a carve out for health if the women.
Who’s out there hemming and hawing about getting an abortion for 15, 20, 25 weeks? Waiting for a payout or an engagement? Sounds like drama.
Anonymous
Anonymous
07/27/2022 23:04
Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Well... there are tests courts apply to determine if the speech is protected or not by the 1st amendment or not. An example is the "imminent lawless action" test: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imminent_lawless_action. Providing general advice on how to obtain abortion.... probably is protected speech - but if it's intended to produce imminent lawless action, then maybe not.
Anonymous