Anonymous wrote:Shah Meer Baloch
Iran has made no request for talks with the Americans and has so far completely rejected US requests for negotiations due to their excessive demands, Iran’s state media Tasnim News reported, rejecting the White House press secretary earlier remarks about Tehran’s request for talks.

Take that, kkkaroline. Stop telling lies.

It's funny that you actually believe... Iranian state media. But you do you!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump is, interestingly, denying China access to oil. Seems a pretty good game plan to bring down your only superpower contender.

No he hasn’t.
As of late April 2026 Iran has over 140 million barrels of crude and condensate stored on floating tankers. A significant portion waiting to be delivered or already in transit to China according to Vortexa. Most of this is sit in Chinese water. It’s enough to meet Chinese needs and fulfill Irans Chinese contracts for 3 months.

China is doing fine. China has moved to electrify their economy. China relies on oil for 18% of their energy needs and has reached peak oil demand. Each year China needs less oil. The US for reference depends on oil for 38% of its energy needs. China is buying Saudi oil from Red Sea ports and most Iranian tankers are not being stopped.

You need to take a break from the grifters and their fake news. Trump and republicans are con men and you are the mark.

Speaking of... it's always people who say this who deliberately never provide any credible sources to back up their claims. Case in point, you.
DP

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Iran was going to execute 8 women.

Stopped by Trump.

Yes I’m sure the fake families of those fake AI-generated women are very relieved.

Yep, dropsite already debunked this stupid narrative. Of course these same Zionists are the ones who are silent on the hundred plus school girls killed in the opening strike.

And you pro-Islamic extremists continue to be silent about the thousands of Iranian protesters who were executed by the regime.

More cops died than protestors. There were masked protestors who were shooting at the cops. It was a spy operation gone awry

Sure. Any other Iranian propaganda you'd like to share, straight from the mouth of the corrupt Iranian foreign minister?

The IRGC is only accelerating executions of protesters. They are a grotesque, monstrous regime.

https://abcnews.com/International/executions-protesters-iran-surge-start-war-human-rights/story?id=132250133

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Iran was going to execute 8 women.

Stopped by Trump.

How many women did trump kill in Iran since this war started?

DP. Funny that the number of Iranian women killed by IRAN doesn't seem to concern you.

Facts and Figures

At least 31 women were executed in 2024—the highest number in over 15 years.
A minimum of 241 women were executed between 2010 and 2024.
121 women (50%) were identified only by initials or remained completely anonymous.
114 women were executed for murder, while 107 women were executed on drug-related charges.
Four women were executed for security-related charges such as moharebeh (waging war against God) and ifsad-fil-arz (corruption on earth). Among them was one Jewish woman and two Kurdish political prisoners.
9 of the executed women were child brides, three of whom were also child offenders, meaning they were under 18 at the time of their alleged crime.
70% of women executed for murder were accused of killing their husbands or partners, often in contexts of domestic violence.
Women from marginalised provinces like Sistan and Baluchistan were disproportionately represented among drug-related executions, highlighting the intersection of systemic discrimination, poverty, and judicial bias.

https://www.iranhr.net/en/articles/7263/

Whatabout? Howabout? When you find an example that reaches the scope of 80 years of apartheid, genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity against indigenous inhabitants and every single neighbor, maybe that will work.

Israel First going damn mad with their desperation. The zio playbook has been shredded and there is no replacement. The days of wagging the dog and justifying genocide and war crimes is over. The entire world despises Israel. America, the only friend in the world, is gone because gaslighting and brainwashing children during public education no longer works. When the EU finally sanctions Israel, how long is that that bought friendship with Greece and Cyprus going to last? Or the ones with GCC countries?

When Israel is finally ostracized by America and has to sit in the corner forever with sanctions until the democracy they claim is the democracy they realize, we'll see how oppressive all these other countries are without a POS constantly lobbing bombs and killing hundreds of thousands of people.

But it's safe to say that Israel has been directly responsible for the fate of over a dozen countries after 80 years of terrorism, destabilization efforts, and regime changes.

You are utterly comical. No mention from you about the past 80 years of IRANIAN terrorism against not only Israelis and other ME countries, but also against Americans. Hezbollah and Hamas are Iranian proxies and have targeted Israelis and Americans for decades - since 1979. The Iranian regime has waged a sustained campaign of violence against the United States, killing U.S. troops, targeting diplomats and civilians, and plotting attacks on American soil. "Death to America" is their mantra.

You can certainly spin your anti-Israel fantasies all you want, but you are on the wrong side of history. Speaking of which, learn some.

https://thehill.com/policy/international/5765178-inside-irans-long-history-of-attacks-on-us-a-timeline/
https://iranprimer.usip.org/blog/2020/sep/16/timeline-iran-assassinations-and-plot
https://www.cfr.org/articles/irans-regional-armed-network

State Department Openly Admits Israel Pushed Us Into Iran War
https://newrepublic.com/post/209518/state-department-admits-israel-iran-war

Even the State Department recognizes that the U.S. entered the Iran war on behalf of Israel.

A government release written earlier this week by Reed D. Rubinstein, the department’s legal adviser, detailed how the U.S. “is engaged in this conflict at the request of and in the collective self-defense of its Israeli ally, as well as in the exercise of the United States’ own inherent right of self-defense.” The release cited multiple letters issued by the agency to the U.N. Security Council as evidence of the apparent connection.

But the candid admission directly contradicts the White House and Donald Trump, who has repeatedly insisted that Israel had nothing to do with his decision to spark another unpopular Middle East war. Just this week, Trump complained online about the circling narrative, claiming on Truth Social that “Israel never talked me into the war with Iran” but that “the results of Oct. 7th, added to my lifelong opinion that IRAN CAN NEVER HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON, did.”

U.S. involvement in the war was reportedly arranged following a February 11 meeting between Trump, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and several U.S. and Israeli officials in the White House Situation Room, The New York Times reported earlier this month.

It was reportedly Netanyahu’s direct influence—and the ensuing pressure campaign—that thrust America into the war. U.S. military commanders advised Trump that components of Netanyahu’s plan to attack Iran were “farcical,” but by that point, Trump had already been inspired to throw over Tehran’s theocratic regime.

It’s likely that Netanyahu continues to hold the reins. Last month, Trump told The Times of Israel that the decision to end the Iran war will be a “mutual” decision he makes with the Israeli leader—though Israel has not made peace negotiations easy, repeatedly defying fragile ceasefire arrangements by relentlessly bombing its regional neighbors.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Iran about to get pounded
A third US aircraft carrier, the USS George H.W. Bush, has arrived in waters near Iran along with its escorting warships, significantly expanding American military presence in the region.

lol All aircraft carriers have to be 500 plus miles off the coast of Iran. The range of an f-35 is 500 miles. So to get in range of Iran’s coast it takes a refueling. This has to be at least 150 miles from the Iranian coast. Most likely need another refueling to make it back to the carrier. The f-35 is a junk. How they have some f-18s.

This carrier group was added because the US needs more ships and air assets to run blockade Iran. Still do not have enough ship and air cover to blockade Iran. Cuba took 8 aircraft carriers, 200 plus ship and we had land based aircraft for a 500 miles quarantine zone.

You are mixing bad numbers with bad history. There is no fixed rule that carriers must sit “500 plus miles” off Iran. Carrier locations depend on threat, escorts, submarines, mission needs, tankers, and intelligence. The three U.S. carriers are already operating across the Red Sea, Arabian Sea, and broader CENTCOM theater, which is exactly how modern naval power projects force. The F-35C claim is wrong too. Its published combat radius is over 600 nautical miles, not “500 miles,” and that is mission radius, not simple one-way distance. Tanker support is routine for every advanced air force because it increases loiter time, payload flexibility, and persistence. That does not make the aircraft junk. It makes it part of a modern integrated force.

Calling the F-35 junk is especially uninformed. It is one of the most advanced fighters in the world with stealth, sensor fusion, electronic warfare capability, and networking that older jets cannot match. The reason carriers still fly F/A-18E/F Super Hornets is because the Navy has not fully replaced legacy fleets yet and procurement decisions over multiple administrations slowed the transition. The F-22 production line was shut down during the Obama administration, leaving the U.S. with too few top-tier air superiority fighters, while slower F-35 procurement stretched replacement timelines and prolonged reliance on legacy F/A-18 fleets. That is a force-structure issue, not a failure of the aircraft.

The Cuba comparison is also weak. In 1962 there were no stealth aircraft, no satellite ISR, no precision strike networks, no Growlers, no E-2D battle management, no Tomahawk-capable escorts, and no modern datalink warfare. Counting eight carriers then versus three now ignores that a modern 200+ aircraft carrier force can generate effects that far exceed raw 1962 numbers. This is internet math, not military analysis.

Anonymous wrote:Shah Meer Baloch
Iran has made no request for talks with the Americans and has so far completely rejected US requests for negotiations due to their excessive demands, Iran’s state media Tasnim News reported, rejecting the White House press secretary earlier remarks about Tehran’s request for talks.


Take that, kkkaroline. Stop telling lies.

Should I believe Presidential Truths Social Post or the Iranian government?
This is the question.

Iran's latest Lego drop: "We love Americans".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2R7xUxtd5Bk

Americans Spent $8.4 Billion More on Gas in the First Month of Trump’s Iran War

Anonymous wrote:Iran about to get pounded
A third US aircraft carrier, the USS George H.W. Bush, has arrived in waters near Iran along with its escorting warships, significantly expanding American military presence in the region.

lol All aircraft carriers have to be 500 plus miles off the coast of Iran. The range of an f-35 is 500 miles. So to get in range of Iran’s coast it takes a refueling. This has to be at least 150 miles from the Iranian coast. Most likely need another refueling to make it back to the carrier. The f-35 is a junk. How they have some f-18s.

This carrier group was added because the US needs more ships and air assets to run blockade Iran. Still do not have enough ship and air cover to blockade Iran. Cuba took 8 aircraft carriers, 200 plus ship and we had land based aircraft for a 500 miles quarantine zone.

The Desperation.

Iran sent a delegation to Islamabad to hold bilateral talks with Pakistani officials this weekend.

So Trump sends the grovelling zionist Two Stooges on an unplanned trip to Islamabad for "talks"

The Iranians have said there are no scheduled talks with America.

If there weren't zionist war crimes involved, this would be pathetically hilarious. Instead, it's just pathetic.

Iranian delegation led by FM Araghchi lands in Islamabad; US officials to also arrive in Pakistan
https://www.dawn.com/news/1994680/iranian-delegation-led-by-fm-araghchi-lands-in-islamabad-us-officials-to-also-arrive-in-pakistan

Foreign Office (FO) Spokesperson Tahir Andrabi said on Friday that an Iranian delegation led by the Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi had arrived in Islamabad.

The development came as the White House said that envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner would also be heading to Pakistan for talks with Iran. However, Iran asserted that it would not be meeting with the US.

In a post on X, FO spokesperson Andrabi Araghchi was received by Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar, Chief of Defence Forces and Chief of Army Staff Field Marshal Asim Munir and other senior officials.

Earlier, Pakistani sources said a small negotiating team was expected to accompany the foreign minister.

They said a second round of peace talks with the United States was also expected and that a logistics and security team from the US was already in the federal capital.

However, the spokesperson for Iran’s foreign ministry, Esmaeil Baqaei, said on X that no meeting was planned to take place between the US and Iran.

“Iran’s observations would be conveyed to Pakistan,” he said. He said the Iranian delegation will be meeting with high-level officials in “concert with their ongoing mediation and good offices for ending American imposed war of aggression and the restitution of peace in our region”.

Estimated inventories as of today

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Iran about to get pounded
A third US aircraft carrier, the USS George H.W. Bush, has arrived in waters near Iran along with its escorting warships, significantly expanding American military presence in the region.

Ah yes, right on schedule as the market closes on Friday. War on the weekends, peace while the market is open.

Hell's yeah fuk up them hajis

Shah Meer Baloch
Iran has made no request for talks with the Americans and has so far completely rejected US requests for negotiations due to their excessive demands, Iran’s state media Tasnim News reported, rejecting the White House press secretary earlier remarks about Tehran’s request for talks.


Take that, kkkaroline. Stop telling lies.

Anonymous wrote:Iran about to get pounded
A third US aircraft carrier, the USS George H.W. Bush, has arrived in waters near Iran along with its escorting warships, significantly expanding American military presence in the region.

Ah yes, right on schedule as the market closes on Friday. War on the weekends, peace while the market is open.