Anonymous wrote:The problem with these ideas is it is just a band aid. What needs to change is how much colleges are over charging students. Yet no one spends anytime lobbying for that.
And PP, I agree. Those that have paid off their loans should get equal treatment, but that is just not how we seem to be running things right now.
Anonymous wrote:How does having student loan debt mean I made a bad choice? I was able to get a great job with my Master’s degree. Not a bad choice at all. I was the first person to graduate high school in my family. I was able to go to college and graduate school with loans. I fail to see the bad choice I made other than being born to parents who were poor and didn’t finish high school.
Anonymous wrote:Imagine if it were healthcare debt that that would be the better gift. Wipe all that clean.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is this going to retroactively also include the good folks who paid off their loans on their own?
+1. I have always said that after the polio vaccine was discovered, all the people who suffered from polio before should have been compensated.![]()
That’s a valid point if they had a choice, which they didn’t. You’re rewarding those who made bad choices and penalizing the responsible people, why is that hard to get?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is this going to retroactively also include the good folks who paid off their loans on their own?
+1. I have always said that after the polio vaccine was discovered, all the people who suffered from polio before should have been compensated.![]()
That’s a valid point if they had a choice, which they didn’t. You’re rewarding those who made bad choices and penalizing the responsible people, why is that hard to get?
Anonymous wrote:If senate dems were genuinely serious about this (and I contend they're not, they're all rich out of touch multi-millionaires themselves, with the same Wall Street donors and lobbyists in their ears), they would marry this $50K forgiveness to support for Trump's scotus nom. Because Trump may win in November, and if he does, he will have zero interest or motivation in any student forgiveness. So the only leverage they'll have for the next five years is right now. And Trump's scotus nom *is* going to get through, so what is the point of posturing for cameras for the next 6 weeks? All for nothing; pointless theatre while Main Street sinks deeper.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is this going to retroactively also include the good folks who paid off their loans on their own?
+1. I have always said that after the polio vaccine was discovered, all the people who suffered from polio before should have been compensated.![]()
Anonymous wrote:Interest free loans. Done