Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:An actual cult member. Perfect choice.

If someone isn’t a democrat (VOTE BLUE NO MATTER WHO1!1!1!!!!111!!!111) they are a cult member, because in our democracy, only one party is necessary.

Yes, our two party system is flawed: we have democrats (sane, intelligent, patriotic) vs republicans (insane, stupid, traitors).

The founders intended that democrats win every election, every time, and never lose a presidential election, how do you people not know that?

Ask anyone from Hawaii, or look up Jagad Guru/ Chris Butler in the Science of Identity Foundation. That’s her dad. She was literally raised in a cult.

When Tulsi was a democrat, you didn’t care about her childhood.

But now, suddenly, her childhood is problematic.

Selective outrage, yawn.

gabbard was always a sideshow and not popular with dems.she was a frequent guest on fox news and doing her assad shilling pr tours in syria way before she aligned herself with trump.

Really? You know we have access to the internet too, right?

She was extremely popular in Democratic circles until she spoke out about the rigged primary process in 2016 and didn’t shut up and kiss Hillary’s ring.

She wasn’t a “Russian asset” when she spoke at the 2012 convention or was the DNC vice chair. She only was slandered as one after she bravely spoke out against DNC corruption. It’s how the party treats women who dare to think for themselves.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulsi_Gabbard

As the Democratic nominee, Gabbard spoke at the 2012 Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, North Carolina, at the invitation of House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, who called Gabbard "an emerging star".

…

On January 22, 2013, Gabbard was unanimously elected to a four-year term as a vice chair of the Democratic National Committee

psst - she was the DEI pick, an emerging star who didn't materialize into actual star

LOL

Well, She’s a huge star now! She couldn’t be bigger. Dems here trying to rewrite history. Lol. They loved Tulsi until she crossed corrupt unpopular Hillary then they tried to destroy her but they failed.

What a misstep for the Dems to lose her. Their loss, the country’s gain. She’ll be the first woman President.

Tulsi is on the right side of history. The clintonian corruption in the DNc is what she bravely spoke out against. I hope she mentions Seth rich. He died in 2016 supposedly because he exposed how the DNC cheated the primaries for Hillary. Hillary is the one who caused the downfall of the Dem party. She was not the elected candidate in the 2008 primaries so why would anyone ever think she would have a chance in 2016? So many dems mainly millennials like Tulsi exited the party in 2016 after Bernie Sanders was cheated out of the primaries. The Dems cleared the field in 2016 for Hillary and her coronation didn’t pan out so now they are struggling to find potentials. Hillary was the advocate encouraging Tulsi to be placed on the terror watch list as a Russian asset. She deserves to be on the terror watch list for all the money laundering cash she took for the Clinton global initiative and all the resources she stole from Haiti

The DNC, just like the RNC, is a highly corrupt entity that needs to have it's doors closed but none of that is HRC's fault. If Tulsi wants to speak the truth to the rotten toxicity of the DNC, she needs to speak that same truth about the RNC.

The RNC is less corrupt than the DNC

That's an opinion you are entitled to. The fact that can't be argued is they are both corrupt and any level of corrupt is still corrupt. They need to go. Giving them money is like giving the devil money.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Democrats are freaking out because they're finally putting someone in charge of national security that isn't a psychopath.

Why do you think she’s the best candidate for the job. Not asking why you think she’s minimally qualified. Asking why, of all the options Trump has, she’s the best choice.

Before criticizing Trumps picks you need to defend Biden picks.

What was Blinken’s qualifications? The guy spent his career as a Biden staffer.

Or how about Jake Sullivan? Campaign aid to Obama and Clinton followed by sinecure at Yale.

Democratic partisans are fascinating in their inability for self reflection before accusation.

Not sure why you’re bringing up other people. This thread is about Tulsi Gabbard. I’d like to know why you think she’s the best person for the job. Can you answer?

If you never questioned the credentials of Biden’s natsec appointments then you really don’t get to question Trump’s selections. Particularly since Biden has probably been the worst President for American power in since, well, pre-WW2. His team was a bunch of incompetent lackeys.

Bush was objectively worse than Biden for American power. And Trump wants to give it all up and be isolationist.

Trump doesn’t want to give it all up. I don’t think there’s any leader around the world who thinks Trump is weak. Trump is believed with just his threats and his words which is why immigrants are self deporting or leaving caravans. It’s why Putin and Zelensky will listen and stop the war if Trump says so. It’s why Netanyahu will stop the war in Gaza and Lebanon according to anonymous Israeli insiders prior or shortly after Trump is sworn into office. When you excude masculine energy and are an alpha, people believe and do as you say and everyone falls in line.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:An actual cult member. Perfect choice.

If someone isn’t a democrat (VOTE BLUE NO MATTER WHO1!1!1!!!!111!!!111) they are a cult member, because in our democracy, only one party is necessary.

Yes, our two party system is flawed: we have democrats (sane, intelligent, patriotic) vs republicans (insane, stupid, traitors).

The founders intended that democrats win every election, every time, and never lose a presidential election, how do you people not know that?

Ask anyone from Hawaii, or look up Jagad Guru/ Chris Butler in the Science of Identity Foundation. That’s her dad. She was literally raised in a cult.

When Tulsi was a democrat, you didn’t care about her childhood.

But now, suddenly, her childhood is problematic.

Selective outrage, yawn.

gabbard was always a sideshow and not popular with dems.she was a frequent guest on fox news and doing her assad shilling pr tours in syria way before she aligned herself with trump.

Really? You know we have access to the internet too, right?

She was extremely popular in Democratic circles until she spoke out about the rigged primary process in 2016 and didn’t shut up and kiss Hillary’s ring.

She wasn’t a “Russian asset” when she spoke at the 2012 convention or was the DNC vice chair. She only was slandered as one after she bravely spoke out against DNC corruption. It’s how the party treats women who dare to think for themselves.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulsi_Gabbard

As the Democratic nominee, Gabbard spoke at the 2012 Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, North Carolina, at the invitation of House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, who called Gabbard "an emerging star".

…

On January 22, 2013, Gabbard was unanimously elected to a four-year term as a vice chair of the Democratic National Committee

psst - she was the DEI pick, an emerging star who didn't materialize into actual star

LOL

Well, She’s a huge star now! She couldn’t be bigger. Dems here trying to rewrite history. Lol. They loved Tulsi until she crossed corrupt unpopular Hillary then they tried to destroy her but they failed.

What a misstep for the Dems to lose her. Their loss, the country’s gain. She’ll be the first woman President.

Tulsi is on the right side of history. The clintonian corruption in the DNc is what she bravely spoke out against. I hope she mentions Seth rich. He died in 2016 supposedly because he exposed how the DNC cheated the primaries for Hillary. Hillary is the one who caused the downfall of the Dem party. She was not the elected candidate in the 2008 primaries so why would anyone ever think she would have a chance in 2016? So many dems mainly millennials like Tulsi exited the party in 2016 after Bernie Sanders was cheated out of the primaries. The Dems cleared the field in 2016 for Hillary and her coronation didn’t pan out so now they are struggling to find potentials. Hillary was the advocate encouraging Tulsi to be placed on the terror watch list as a Russian asset. She deserves to be on the terror watch list for all the money laundering cash she took for the Clinton global initiative and all the resources she stole from Haiti

The DNC, just like the RNC, is a highly corrupt entity that needs to have it's doors closed but none of that is HRC's fault. If Tulsi wants to speak the truth to the rotten toxicity of the DNC, she needs to speak that same truth about the RNC.

The RNC is less corrupt than the DNC

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:An actual cult member. Perfect choice.

If someone isn’t a democrat (VOTE BLUE NO MATTER WHO1!1!1!!!!111!!!111) they are a cult member, because in our democracy, only one party is necessary.

Yes, our two party system is flawed: we have democrats (sane, intelligent, patriotic) vs republicans (insane, stupid, traitors).

The founders intended that democrats win every election, every time, and never lose a presidential election, how do you people not know that?

Ask anyone from Hawaii, or look up Jagad Guru/ Chris Butler in the Science of Identity Foundation. That’s her dad. She was literally raised in a cult.

When Tulsi was a democrat, you didn’t care about her childhood.

But now, suddenly, her childhood is problematic.

Selective outrage, yawn.

gabbard was always a sideshow and not popular with dems.she was a frequent guest on fox news and doing her assad shilling pr tours in syria way before she aligned herself with trump.

Really? You know we have access to the internet too, right?

She was extremely popular in Democratic circles until she spoke out about the rigged primary process in 2016 and didn’t shut up and kiss Hillary’s ring.

She wasn’t a “Russian asset” when she spoke at the 2012 convention or was the DNC vice chair. She only was slandered as one after she bravely spoke out against DNC corruption. It’s how the party treats women who dare to think for themselves.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulsi_Gabbard

As the Democratic nominee, Gabbard spoke at the 2012 Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, North Carolina, at the invitation of House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, who called Gabbard "an emerging star".

…

On January 22, 2013, Gabbard was unanimously elected to a four-year term as a vice chair of the Democratic National Committee

psst - she was the DEI pick, an emerging star who didn't materialize into actual star

LOL

Well, She’s a huge star now! She couldn’t be bigger. Dems here trying to rewrite history. Lol. They loved Tulsi until she crossed corrupt unpopular Hillary then they tried to destroy her but they failed.

What a misstep for the Dems to lose her. Their loss, the country’s gain. She’ll be the first woman President.

https://lexfridman.com/tu...ranscript/

“It’s a sad state of affairs when some of the most influential voices in our country will label someone a lover or supporter of dictators simply because you’re saying, “Hey, we shouldn’t be going to war. There is another way.”

“Of course, I served in a medical unit during that first deployment to Iraq. It was 2005 during the height of that war, and unfortunately we took a lot of casualties. We, across the entire US military, my brigade that I deployed with was from the Hawaii National Guard. We had approximately 3000 soldiers who were operating in four different areas of Iraq. And my first task every day was to go through a list of every combat related injury that had occurred the day before in the country.”

“Experiencing firsthand that high human cost of war caused me, a 20-something-year-old from Hawaii… I had left my seat in the state legislature to volunteer to deploy with my brothers and sisters in my unit to Iraq, and so recognize the cost of war, I think, in two fundamental ways. Number one is the high human cost of war on our troops and on the people in the country where this war was being waged. And also the cost on American taxpayers.“
Seeing then, back again in 2005, and recognizing KBR Halliburton, one of the biggest defense contracting companies then, and I know that they’re still very much in that business now, Dick Cheney being connected with that company at one point or another, but in our camp specifically, which was one of the larger ones in Iraq at that time, there wasn’t anything that happened in our camp that didn’t have the KBR Halliburton logo imprinted on it.”

And yet the dummy Democrats support Liz Cheney over a former progressive Dem like Tulsi Gabbard who received more love from Trump than the own Dem Party rank and file. This woman ran a part of the DNC and even she ran away from them. What does that tell us? She went from rising star to persona non grata overnight all because she spoke about St. Hillary

This can all be resolved by having her undergo a full and complete FBI background investigation.

Republicans don’t object to that, correct?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:An actual cult member. Perfect choice.

If someone isn’t a democrat (VOTE BLUE NO MATTER WHO1!1!1!!!!111!!!111) they are a cult member, because in our democracy, only one party is necessary.

Yes, our two party system is flawed: we have democrats (sane, intelligent, patriotic) vs republicans (insane, stupid, traitors).

The founders intended that democrats win every election, every time, and never lose a presidential election, how do you people not know that?

Ask anyone from Hawaii, or look up Jagad Guru/ Chris Butler in the Science of Identity Foundation. That’s her dad. She was literally raised in a cult.

When Tulsi was a democrat, you didn’t care about her childhood.

But now, suddenly, her childhood is problematic.

Selective outrage, yawn.

gabbard was always a sideshow and not popular with dems.she was a frequent guest on fox news and doing her assad shilling pr tours in syria way before she aligned herself with trump.

Really? You know we have access to the internet too, right?

She was extremely popular in Democratic circles until she spoke out about the rigged primary process in 2016 and didn’t shut up and kiss Hillary’s ring.

She wasn’t a “Russian asset” when she spoke at the 2012 convention or was the DNC vice chair. She only was slandered as one after she bravely spoke out against DNC corruption. It’s how the party treats women who dare to think for themselves.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulsi_Gabbard

As the Democratic nominee, Gabbard spoke at the 2012 Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, North Carolina, at the invitation of House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, who called Gabbard "an emerging star".

…

On January 22, 2013, Gabbard was unanimously elected to a four-year term as a vice chair of the Democratic National Committee

psst - she was the DEI pick, an emerging star who didn't materialize into actual star

LOL

Well, She’s a huge star now! She couldn’t be bigger. Dems here trying to rewrite history. Lol. They loved Tulsi until she crossed corrupt unpopular Hillary then they tried to destroy her but they failed.

What a misstep for the Dems to lose her. Their loss, the country’s gain. She’ll be the first woman President.

Tulsi is on the right side of history. The clintonian corruption in the DNc is what she bravely spoke out against. I hope she mentions Seth rich. He died in 2016 supposedly because he exposed how the DNC cheated the primaries for Hillary. Hillary is the one who caused the downfall of the Dem party. She was not the elected candidate in the 2008 primaries so why would anyone ever think she would have a chance in 2016? So many dems mainly millennials like Tulsi exited the party in 2016 after Bernie Sanders was cheated out of the primaries. The Dems cleared the field in 2016 for Hillary and her coronation didn’t pan out so now they are struggling to find potentials. Hillary was the advocate encouraging Tulsi to be placed on the terror watch list as a Russian asset. She deserves to be on the terror watch list for all the money laundering cash she took for the Clinton global initiative and all the resources she stole from Haiti

The DNC, just like the RNC, is a highly corrupt entity that needs to have it's doors closed but none of that is HRC's fault. If Tulsi wants to speak the truth to the rotten toxicity of the DNC, she needs to speak that same truth about the RNC.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:An actual cult member. Perfect choice.

If someone isn’t a democrat (VOTE BLUE NO MATTER WHO1!1!1!!!!111!!!111) they are a cult member, because in our democracy, only one party is necessary.

Yes, our two party system is flawed: we have democrats (sane, intelligent, patriotic) vs republicans (insane, stupid, traitors).

The founders intended that democrats win every election, every time, and never lose a presidential election, how do you people not know that?

Ask anyone from Hawaii, or look up Jagad Guru/ Chris Butler in the Science of Identity Foundation. That’s her dad. She was literally raised in a cult.

When Tulsi was a democrat, you didn’t care about her childhood.

But now, suddenly, her childhood is problematic.

Selective outrage, yawn.

gabbard was always a sideshow and not popular with dems.she was a frequent guest on fox news and doing her assad shilling pr tours in syria way before she aligned herself with trump.

Really? You know we have access to the internet too, right?

She was extremely popular in Democratic circles until she spoke out about the rigged primary process in 2016 and didn’t shut up and kiss Hillary’s ring.

She wasn’t a “Russian asset” when she spoke at the 2012 convention or was the DNC vice chair. She only was slandered as one after she bravely spoke out against DNC corruption. It’s how the party treats women who dare to think for themselves.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulsi_Gabbard

As the Democratic nominee, Gabbard spoke at the 2012 Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, North Carolina, at the invitation of House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, who called Gabbard "an emerging star".

…

On January 22, 2013, Gabbard was unanimously elected to a four-year term as a vice chair of the Democratic National Committee

psst - she was the DEI pick, an emerging star who didn't materialize into actual star

LOL

Well, She’s a huge star now! She couldn’t be bigger. Dems here trying to rewrite history. Lol. They loved Tulsi until she crossed corrupt unpopular Hillary then they tried to destroy her but they failed.

What a misstep for the Dems to lose her. Their loss, the country’s gain. She’ll be the first woman President.

Tulsi is on the right side of history. The clintonian corruption in the DNc is what she bravely spoke out against. I hope she mentions Seth rich. He died in 2016 supposedly because he exposed how the DNC cheated the primaries for Hillary. Hillary is the one who caused the downfall of the Dem party. She was not the elected candidate in the 2008 primaries so why would anyone ever think she would have a chance in 2016? So many dems mainly millennials like Tulsi exited the party in 2016 after Bernie Sanders was cheated out of the primaries. The Dems cleared the field in 2016 for Hillary and her coronation didn’t pan out so now they are struggling to find potentials. Hillary was the advocate encouraging Tulsi to be placed on the terror watch list as a Russian asset. She deserves to be on the terror watch list for all the money laundering cash she took for the Clinton global initiative and all the resources she stole from Haiti

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Democrats are freaking out because they're finally putting someone in charge of national security that isn't a psychopath.

Why do you think she’s the best candidate for the job. Not asking why you think she’s minimally qualified. Asking why, of all the options Trump has, she’s the best choice.

Before criticizing Trumps picks you need to defend Biden picks.

What was Blinken’s qualifications? The guy spent his career as a Biden staffer.

Or how about Jake Sullivan? Campaign aid to Obama and Clinton followed by sinecure at Yale.

Democratic partisans are fascinating in their inability for self reflection before accusation.

Not sure why you’re bringing up other people. This thread is about Tulsi Gabbard. I’d like to know why you think she’s the best person for the job. Can you answer?

If you never questioned the credentials of Biden’s natsec appointments then you really don’t get to question Trump’s selections. Particularly since Biden has probably been the worst President for American power in since, well, pre-WW2. His team was a bunch of incompetent lackeys.

Bush was objectively worse than Biden for American power. And Trump wants to give it all up and be isolationist.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Democrats are freaking out because they're finally putting someone in charge of national security that isn't a psychopath.

Why do you think she’s the best candidate for the job. Not asking why you think she’s minimally qualified. Asking why, of all the options Trump has, she’s the best choice.

Before criticizing Trumps picks you need to defend Biden picks.

What was Blinken’s qualifications? The guy spent his career as a Biden staffer.

Or how about Jake Sullivan? Campaign aid to Obama and Clinton followed by sinecure at Yale.

Democratic partisans are fascinating in their inability for self reflection before accusation.

Not sure why you’re bringing up other people. This thread is about Tulsi Gabbard. I’d like to know why you think she’s the best person for the job. Can you answer?

If you never questioned the credentials of Biden’s natsec appointments then you really don’t get to question Trump’s selections. Particularly since Biden has probably been the worst President for American power in since, well, pre-WW2. His team was a bunch of incompetent lackeys.

Biden was our FDR and one day to will appreciate him.

Are you trolling?

You morons would prefer a hack to put your kids in WW3?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Democrats are freaking out because they're finally putting someone in charge of national security that isn't a psychopath.

Why do you think she’s the best candidate for the job. Not asking why you think she’s minimally qualified. Asking why, of all the options Trump has, she’s the best choice.

Before criticizing Trumps picks you need to defend Biden picks.

What was Blinken’s qualifications? The guy spent his career as a Biden staffer.

Or how about Jake Sullivan? Campaign aid to Obama and Clinton followed by sinecure at Yale.

Democratic partisans are fascinating in their inability for self reflection before accusation.

Not sure why you’re bringing up other people. This thread is about Tulsi Gabbard. I’d like to know why you think she’s the best person for the job. Can you answer?

If you never questioned the credentials of Biden’s natsec appointments then you really don’t get to question Trump’s selections. Particularly since Biden has probably been the worst President for American power in since, well, pre-WW2. His team was a bunch of incompetent lackeys.

Biden was our FDR and one day to will appreciate him.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Democrats are freaking out because they're finally putting someone in charge of national security that isn't a psychopath.

Why do you think she’s the best candidate for the job. Not asking why you think she’s minimally qualified. Asking why, of all the options Trump has, she’s the best choice.

Before criticizing Trumps picks you need to defend Biden picks.

What was Blinken’s qualifications? The guy spent his career as a Biden staffer.

Or how about Jake Sullivan? Campaign aid to Obama and Clinton followed by sinecure at Yale.

Democratic partisans are fascinating in their inability for self reflection before accusation.

Not sure why you’re bringing up other people. This thread is about Tulsi Gabbard. I’d like to know why you think she’s the best person for the job. Can you answer?

If you never questioned the credentials of Biden’s natsec appointments then you really don’t get to question Trump’s selections. Particularly since Biden has probably been the worst President for American power in since, well, pre-WW2. His team was a bunch of incompetent lackeys.

Someone on Russian TV called her “our girlfriend “. I’d like to know more about why they said that.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is a woman, of Polynesian (Samoan) descent, and serves in the military.

She meets all of the Dem DEI requirements for being appointed.

But she’s compromised so then fails on that alone. Next!

Nice libel.

Yup. It's all they have.

I like Tulsi. She will be great.

Hope she takes vengeance too for Biden & Company putting her on the terror watch list, and abusing power in general.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Democrats are freaking out because they're finally putting someone in charge of national security that isn't a psychopath.

Why do you think she’s the best candidate for the job. Not asking why you think she’s minimally qualified. Asking why, of all the options Trump has, she’s the best choice.

Before criticizing Trumps picks you need to defend Biden picks.

What was Blinken’s qualifications? The guy spent his career as a Biden staffer.

Or how about Jake Sullivan? Campaign aid to Obama and Clinton followed by sinecure at Yale.

Democratic partisans are fascinating in their inability for self reflection before accusation.

Not sure why you’re bringing up other people. This thread is about Tulsi Gabbard. I’d like to know why you think she’s the best person for the job. Can you answer?

DP. I guess you'll have to research her for yourself. Plenty of podcasts and writings by her out there.

Don't ask other people to do your homework for you, lackey.