Leave this poor family alone!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In my opinion the ransom letter was almost certainly written by her mother to cover up an accidental death at the hands of a family member or negligence.

On this tangent, my theory is, the child wet her bed, the mother committed manslaughter and rationalized not confessing because she already lost her. I also think the police know who did it, they just can't prove it.

When a person dies they pee. The corpse is not able to hold it in

Sadly, if it had been an intruder, there would be somewhat similar crimes with more than 1 victim

https://people.com/jonbenet-ramsey-dad-john-thinks-knows-murdered-her-exclusive-8749883

New Netflix series and dad is talking about it. He thinks it was an intruder.

I think Patsy did it or possibly husband or son. IMO, it seems like she wrote the ransom note.

Question: why try to make it look like a kidnapping? To stall for time once the police got there? Why would they do that?

John Ramsey and friend found the body. I did think that was a surprise and why I also think she did it.

The garrotte is the weirdest part of it.

The election aside, I thought this was solved? The homeless guy who hung out around her neighborhood who was obsessed with her and probably went through her trash. That's why he would have seen a reference to the bonus?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Possibly a family member but more likely an intruder.

Whoever it was has enjoyed three decades of blissful freedom & knows very well that they likely will never ever (!) be convicted in a court of law for her untimely murder. ⚖️

It was a horrible crime, but we can all rest easy knowing the killer didn’t have the gall to mistakenly enter a campaign expense in the wrong category.

You are a brainwashed ignoramus.

Of course child murder is more serious than financial crimes. But Trump has tried to overturn our election, committed fraud as a businessman, abused multiple women sexually (even his first wife accused him of rape ), is a tax evader…I could go on, but it us more than enough to justify legal consequences .

+1

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Possibly a family member but more likely an intruder.

Whoever it was has enjoyed three decades of blissful freedom & knows very well that they likely will never ever (!) be convicted in a court of law for her untimely murder. ⚖️

It was a horrible crime, but we can all rest easy knowing the killer didn’t have the gall to mistakenly enter a campaign expense in the wrong category.

You are a brainwashed ignoramus.

Of course child murder is more serious than financial crimes. But Trump has tried to overturn our election, committed fraud as a businessman, abused multiple women sexually (even his first wife accused him of rape ), is a tax evader…I could go on, but it us more than enough to justify legal consequences .

+1

Anonymous wrote:In my opinion the ransom letter was almost certainly written by her mother to cover up an accidental death at the hands of a family member or negligence.

On this tangent, my theory is, the child wet her bed, the mother committed manslaughter and rationalized not confessing because she already lost her. I also think the police know who did it, they just can't prove it.

In my opinion the ransom letter was almost certainly written by her mother to cover up an accidental death at the hands of a family member or negligence.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Possibly a family member but more likely an intruder.

Whoever it was has enjoyed three decades of blissful freedom & knows very well that they likely will never ever (!) be convicted in a court of law for her untimely murder. ⚖️

It was a horrible crime, but we can all rest easy knowing the killer didn’t have the gall to mistakenly enter a campaign expense in the wrong category.

Wow, way to cheapen a young girl’s murder, PP.

I wonder if we’ll ever know for certain who killed her.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Possibly a family member but more likely an intruder.

Whoever it was has enjoyed three decades of blissful freedom & knows very well that they likely will never ever (!) be convicted in a court of law for her untimely murder. ⚖️

It was a horrible crime, but we can all rest easy knowing the killer didn’t have the gall to mistakenly enter a campaign expense in the wrong category.

You are a brainwashed ignoramus.

Of course child murder is more serious than financial crimes. But Trump has tried to overturn our election, committed fraud as a businessman, abused multiple women sexually (even his first wife accused him of rape ), is a tax evader…I could go on, but it us more than enough to justify legal consequences .

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Possibly a family member but more likely an intruder.

Whoever it was has enjoyed three decades of blissful freedom & knows very well that they likely will never ever (!) be convicted in a court of law for her untimely murder. ⚖️

It was a horrible crime, but we can all rest easy knowing the killer didn’t have the gall to mistakenly enter a campaign expense in the wrong category.

Mistakenly? LOL. It was a pattern, not a mistake.

Anonymous wrote:Possibly a family member but more likely an intruder.

Whoever it was has enjoyed three decades of blissful freedom & knows very well that they likely will never ever (!) be convicted in a court of law for her untimely murder. ⚖️

It was a horrible crime, but we can all rest easy knowing the killer didn’t have the gall to mistakenly enter a campaign expense in the wrong category.

Possibly a family member but more likely an intruder.

Whoever it was has enjoyed three decades of blissful freedom & knows very well that they likely will never ever (!) be convicted in a court of law for her untimely murder. ⚖️