Anonymous wrote:SR draw girl put on clinics against Potomac and Visi this week.
Anonymous wrote:If GC had to play a team like SR they might they they could lose. They don’t think they will lose.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Some selfish GC senior play on offense too that led to a lot of turnovers.
Those couple seniors have been like that all season. If they continue their selfish playing on Monday, SJC will take advantage and capitalize on those turnovers. Much like they did a week ago.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:GC 14 BI 10
Wow.Did GC fall asleep during the game ?
Stop being a dick MR!
More like changed goalies.
Staring soon gc goalie gave up 4 goals on 5 shots in first half they switched at half the one senior goalie played the whole 2nd and gave up 6 goals on 6 shots. Goalie play is not the strong suite and hasn’t been in the last several years they have just had an amazing d in-front of them.
Everyone knows Mike is not giving anyone a easy pass, BI earned their respect last night. GG for both teams. Looking forward to seeing SJC on Monday!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:*tournament champs - not reg season.
Both are deserving of recognition!
I hope you felt good posting that
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Stone Ridge girls looked way more athletic than SSSAS girls, overall.
Slow down there - SSSAS came out flat in the first 1/2 and put themselves in a hole.
SR’s Goalie made some crucial saves to slow the momentum during the 2nd half.
If SSSAS was getting stronger and SR was holding on to a win as the game went on wouldn’t that point to SSSAS being more athletic.
Great win by SR they won the game due to a dominant 1st half and excellent goaltending.
Anonymous wrote:Stone Ridge girls looked way more athletic than SSSAS girls, overall.