Anonymous
07/21/2022 09:13
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In Texas News:
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/abortion-travel-restrictions-texas-republicans-1385437/
Republicans Took a Woman’s Right to Choose. Now They’re Threatening Her Right to Travel
In Washington, Republicans say it’s ridiculous to accuse the GOP of trying to prevent women from traveling to access abortion care. In Texas, that project is already underway
"Democrats on the ground in Texas, though, are wise to this tactic. It’s one they’ve seen before, and they are urging outsiders and national Democrats to pay attention: The effort to restrict a woman’s right to travel across state lines is already underway."
“It has come to our attention that Sidley Austin has decided to reimburse the travel costs of employees who leave Texas to murder their unborn children,” the letter, signed by eleven Republicans in the Texas House of Representatives, read. It went on to threaten the law firm — one of the country’s largest — with criminal prosecution and the disbarment of its partners, among other penalties, over its pledge to reimburse “abortion-related travel and, if necessary, related legal-defense expenses” for its employees.
In the letter, Republicans went on to detail their plans to introduce “legislation next session that will impose additional civil and criminal sanctions on law firms that pay for abortions or abortion travel.”
So much for republicans being pro corporation. They might have a hard time fundraising if they are suing the many large employers who have announced plans to help employees with travel costs.
Did it ever dawn on you that these corporations are funding these politicians? Because they overwhelmingly vote Republican. If thesr subsidies are banned, they get to play it both ways. It appears that they wanted to help, but the big bad government stopped them. Meanwhile they save $ and get their tax breaks. They win either way.
The involvement of businesses in governance is a key feature of fascism.
Anonymous
07/20/2022 18:02
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In Texas News:
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/abortion-travel-restrictions-texas-republicans-1385437/
Republicans Took a Woman’s Right to Choose. Now They’re Threatening Her Right to Travel
In Washington, Republicans say it’s ridiculous to accuse the GOP of trying to prevent women from traveling to access abortion care. In Texas, that project is already underway
"Democrats on the ground in Texas, though, are wise to this tactic. It’s one they’ve seen before, and they are urging outsiders and national Democrats to pay attention: The effort to restrict a woman’s right to travel across state lines is already underway."
“It has come to our attention that Sidley Austin has decided to reimburse the travel costs of employees who leave Texas to murder their unborn children,” the letter, signed by eleven Republicans in the Texas House of Representatives, read. It went on to threaten the law firm — one of the country’s largest — with criminal prosecution and the disbarment of its partners, among other penalties, over its pledge to reimburse “abortion-related travel and, if necessary, related legal-defense expenses” for its employees.
In the letter, Republicans went on to detail their plans to introduce “legislation next session that will impose additional civil and criminal sanctions on law firms that pay for abortions or abortion travel.”
So much for republicans being pro corporation. They might have a hard time fundraising if they are suing the many large employers who have announced plans to help employees with travel costs.
Did it ever dawn on you that these corporations are funding these politicians? Because they overwhelmingly vote Republican. If thesr subsidies are banned, they get to play it both ways. It appears that they wanted to help, but the big bad government stopped them. Meanwhile they save $ and get their tax breaks. They win either way.
Anonymous
07/20/2022 17:53
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:In Texas News:
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/abortion-travel-restrictions-texas-republicans-1385437/
Republicans Took a Woman’s Right to Choose. Now They’re Threatening Her Right to Travel
In Washington, Republicans say it’s ridiculous to accuse the GOP of trying to prevent women from traveling to access abortion care. In Texas, that project is already underway
"Democrats on the ground in Texas, though, are wise to this tactic. It’s one they’ve seen before, and they are urging outsiders and national Democrats to pay attention: The effort to restrict a woman’s right to travel across state lines is already underway."
“It has come to our attention that Sidley Austin has decided to reimburse the travel costs of employees who leave Texas to murder their unborn children,” the letter, signed by eleven Republicans in the Texas House of Representatives, read. It went on to threaten the law firm — one of the country’s largest — with criminal prosecution and the disbarment of its partners, among other penalties, over its pledge to reimburse “abortion-related travel and, if necessary, related legal-defense expenses” for its employees.
In the letter, Republicans went on to detail their plans to introduce “legislation next session that will impose additional civil and criminal sanctions on law firms that pay for abortions or abortion travel.”
So much for republicans being pro corporation. They might have a hard time fundraising if they are suing the many large employers who have announced plans to help employees with travel costs.
Anonymous
07/20/2022 17:24
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
In Texas News:
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/abortion-travel-restrictions-texas-republicans-1385437/
Republicans Took a Woman’s Right to Choose. Now They’re Threatening Her Right to Travel
In Washington, Republicans say it’s ridiculous to accuse the GOP of trying to prevent women from traveling to access abortion care. In Texas, that project is already underway
"Democrats on the ground in Texas, though, are wise to this tactic. It’s one they’ve seen before, and they are urging outsiders and national Democrats to pay attention: The effort to restrict a woman’s right to travel across state lines is already underway."
“It has come to our attention that Sidley Austin has decided to reimburse the travel costs of employees who leave Texas to murder their unborn children,” the letter, signed by eleven Republicans in the Texas House of Representatives, read. It went on to threaten the law firm — one of the country’s largest — with criminal prosecution and the disbarment of its partners, among other penalties, over its pledge to reimburse “abortion-related travel and, if necessary, related legal-defense expenses” for its employees.
In the letter, Republicans went on to detail their plans to introduce “legislation next session that will impose additional civil and criminal sanctions on law firms that pay for abortions or abortion travel.”
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/abortion-travel-restrictions-texas-republicans-1385437/
Republicans Took a Woman’s Right to Choose. Now They’re Threatening Her Right to Travel
In Washington, Republicans say it’s ridiculous to accuse the GOP of trying to prevent women from traveling to access abortion care. In Texas, that project is already underway
"Democrats on the ground in Texas, though, are wise to this tactic. It’s one they’ve seen before, and they are urging outsiders and national Democrats to pay attention: The effort to restrict a woman’s right to travel across state lines is already underway."
“It has come to our attention that Sidley Austin has decided to reimburse the travel costs of employees who leave Texas to murder their unborn children,” the letter, signed by eleven Republicans in the Texas House of Representatives, read. It went on to threaten the law firm — one of the country’s largest — with criminal prosecution and the disbarment of its partners, among other penalties, over its pledge to reimburse “abortion-related travel and, if necessary, related legal-defense expenses” for its employees.
In the letter, Republicans went on to detail their plans to introduce “legislation next session that will impose additional civil and criminal sanctions on law firms that pay for abortions or abortion travel.”
Anonymous
07/20/2022 16:44
Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:This is becoming truly Orwellian where doublethink rules. I’m not interested in arguing about what is an abortion. It’s a fundamental right and the Dobbs holding is unconstitutional. It’s a waste of time arguing with people who are insane. The matter needs to go back to the doctor patient relationship and everyone else needs to butt out.
x1 million
Anonymous
07/19/2022 17:47
Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
This is becoming truly Orwellian where doublethink rules. I’m not interested in arguing about what is an abortion. It’s a fundamental right and the Dobbs holding is unconstitutional. It’s a waste of time arguing with people who are insane. The matter needs to go back to the doctor patient relationship and everyone else needs to butt out.
Anonymous
07/19/2022 17:25
Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:
No, I’m claiming that they’re the same. Forced birthers are the ones that think they’re different.
That’s what I thought, but so many drooling forced birthers come on here making those claims; I couldn’t decode the writing, sorry.
Anonymous
07/19/2022 16:47
Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:
Maybe the intent is not to force a 10 year old to carry her rapists baby.
Dr. John Bruchalski certainly makes a lot of money off of his non-profit Divine Mercy Care to educate indigent women about the sanctity of life at all stages- $265,000. Wish some of that money actually went towards the cherished babies that are born from his spiritual work.
Anonymous
07/19/2022 15:05
Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Maybe the intent is not to force a 10 year old to carry her rapists baby.
Anonymous
Anonymous
07/19/2022 14:52
Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
No, I’m claiming that they’re the same. Forced birthers are the ones that think they’re different.
Anonymous
07/19/2022 14:43
Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous
Anonymous
07/19/2022 13:07
Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:The vagueness of the laws and the uncertainty they create are a feature, not a bug. This is what the forced-birthers wanted so that doctors would stop all abortion care.
Extremists like Alexandra DeSanctis Marr have moved the goalposts so many times it's mindboggling.
She posted this in December
Yet now she wants to claim that these laws only outlaw "elective abortions" but not medically necessary ones.
Check in on the femicidal maniac. She’s retweeting several forced birther OBs who ought to be losing their licenses as they’re lying and claiming that life saving abortions aren’t abortions.