Anonymous wrote:How do all you "he didn't rape her" people rationalize that he took pictures of her breasts and texted them to his friends during the assaukt?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is everyone acting like the victim was some old lady adult and the predator was a little boy? He was a MAN at age 19 and she was 23. BOTH young adults.
Yes, It is another disgusting attempt to blame the victim. Calling him a "teenager" to make him seem less culpable for his actions or was lured by this "older" woman. It's bullshit.
So horrified by the people defending him or blaming the victim.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't think it was a party meant just for college freshman, so there would have also been college students of all years, including seniors who could easily be 22-23 years old, so this young woman was not very different in age from many of those at the party. It's not that unusual for college students to be 22 or 23.
Yes - upperclassmen, grad students, recent Stanford grads. People with legitimate ties to the school. Not random older office workers. At the very least Emily should have been coming and going with her sister who did have ties to the school.
God you're an idiot.
Actually I have a point. The very reason that these parties tend to be safer than bars is because the people going in and out of them are a more exclusive group. They are people with ties to the university, they know and recognize each other - if they get out of line they can face discipline and even get kicked out of school.
If I just walk in off the street to a fraternity party at Random University and proceed to help myself to their free alcohol (and undergrads) until I am black out drunk and proceed to stumble around doing stuff until I pass out in a drunken stupor and an ambulance has to be called to take my drunken behind to the hospital. Random University and the fraternity where my heavy out of control drinking happened is left to deal with the fallout. There is nothing they can do to me. I'll just wake up feeling like crap in the morning and go back to my life. Maybe next weekend I'll go to The Other University frat party and do the same thing there.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't think it was a party meant just for college freshman, so there would have also been college students of all years, including seniors who could easily be 22-23 years old, so this young woman was not very different in age from many of those at the party. It's not that unusual for college students to be 22 or 23.
Yes - upperclassmen, grad students, recent Stanford grads. People with legitimate ties to the school. Not random older office workers. At the very least Emily should have been coming and going with her sister who did have ties to the school.
God you're an idiot.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't think it was a party meant just for college freshman, so there would have also been college students of all years, including seniors who could easily be 22-23 years old, so this young woman was not very different in age from many of those at the party. It's not that unusual for college students to be 22 or 23.
Yes - upperclassmen, grad students, recent Stanford grads. People with legitimate ties to the school. Not random older office workers. At the very least Emily should have been coming and going with her sister who did have ties to the school.
Anonymous wrote:I don't think it was a party meant just for college freshman, so there would have also been college students of all years, including seniors who could easily be 22-23 years old, so this young woman was not very different in age from many of those at the party. It's not that unusual for college students to be 22 or 23.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is everyone acting like the victim was some old lady adult and the predator was a little boy? He was a MAN at age 19 and she was 23. BOTH young adults.
He wasn't a year out of HS when this happened. She had 4 years of college under her belt, a full time job and a steady boyfriend and had been to these parties many, many times. And had the tolerance to prove it.
I do not think that unaffiliated college grads should be going to these college specific parties. A college bar is one thing - there are a variety of ages there. But going to a college specific party where you joke that you will be the oldest one there and then proceeding to get drunk out of your mind around young kids who do not know you - that is wrong. And it puts you into creepy territory. Sorry - not a cougar. Creepy.
If a male college grad had gotten severely plastered and led a somewhat drunken freshman girl behind that dumpster and things happened that he was not completely aware of and he passed out half naked in the act and would not wake up - no one would feel sorry for him. In fact, people would be disgusted by the grossness of his behavior.
Anonymous wrote:Why is everyone acting like the victim was some old lady adult and the predator was a little boy? He was a MAN at age 19 and she was 23. BOTH young adults.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is everyone acting like the victim was some old lady adult and the predator was a little boy? He was a MAN at age 19 and she was 23. BOTH young adults.
He was a freshman who had been at school 4 months, she had already been to college and graduated. Not a little boy and an old lady, but still words apart in life experiences.
Think back to when you were a year out of college, working, with a steady SO. A college freshmen was so young, in comparison.
Not that big a difference. And totally irrelevant to the case.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is everyone acting like the victim was some old lady adult and the predator was a little boy? He was a MAN at age 19 and she was 23. BOTH young adults.
He was a freshman who had been at school 4 months, she had already been to college and graduated. Not a little boy and an old lady, but still words apart in life experiences.
Think back to when you were a year out of college, working, with a steady SO. A college freshmen was so young, in comparison.
It is the very short time frame - the time in between them walking behind those dumpsters, starting to fool around and her passing out and the swedes coming along, roughly 7 minutes - that makes it unclear to me who did what to whom when. The swedes say that they saw him dry humping her, not fingering her. What does that mean? I don't know. But it stands to reason that if she was stupidly and very drunkenly on board going behind those dumpsters and then passing out in the middle of it that she could have appeared willing to be fingered to Brock.
Neither one of them had any business going behind those dumpsters together. It was wrong of them both to go back there - she had no business kissing that drunk teenager and he had no business humping her when she passed out. I am not excusing what Brock did. But I am not about to give the green light to this woman for her appalling behavior, either. It is not right to blame the victim or shame her for being sexually assaulted. But we can most certainly call her out for her own extremely bad behavior.
She describes her decision to go to that "dumb" party as a silly, goofy thing to do. Having 4 shots of whiskey and drinking cups of vodka until you are practically comatose is not funny. And it is not up to to a room full of drunk (yet still functional) younger kids to watch out for your drunk azz and make sure that you are making good decisions for yourself. She does not seem to get that. And people seem to be giving her a pass for that.
I have not heard the drunken messages that she left but I can say that I have seen people who wouldn't have been able to even dial their phones much less leave a message - dancing and kissing.