Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The demand for Ring camera subscriptions is about to go way up!

Well yes but they didn't even have a subscription. LE was able to get the videos with a warrant.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:About all you can tell is it's a white guy.

Kind of looks like a woman.

It's so scary.

Anonymous wrote:About all you can tell is it's a white guy.

Anonymous wrote:Doesn't look like her son in law to me.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why do we think it took them so long to be able to access these photos? I understand the person tampered with the cameras etc.

Remember that they did not pay for a subscription so they had to go back and try to restore the files that had already been deleted. This is not some magical poof instant process. Some companies keep a physical back up offsite (like Iron Mountain)and it takes a while to restore.
It may not necessarily have still been in the cloud.

Anonymous wrote:I see a bushy dark beard hidden under the ski mask. Hmmmm.

Anonymous wrote:They say he is armed. What am I missing in the photo. I don't see a gun.

Also, how can you tell what complexion the person is? Are you seeing color photos?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another comment on another board asked if this was a birthday dinner for Nancy as her birthday was 1/27. If it was a birthday dinner, how interesting that none of her friends attended or other family members.

That’s not awfully interesting. 84 is a great age, but not a “milestone” birthday. A dinner at my house is exactly how I expect my own parents would hope to celebrate.

It’s interesting in that if it was planned as a celebration, given her recent birthday, that there were no other guests or witnesses to the dinner. Did she actually make it to the dinner? Was there a dinner?

The uber driver may have picked up a woman, but was it the mother?

Do you have local family? I think people who don't think get togethers need to be huge/momentous. We have annual birthday celebrations with my local MIL where no friends are invited! Not everything has to be a huge party. We just had one last week where we went do dinner then came back for cake. She had lunch separately with her friends. Not "interesting" at all- you are really trying to twist this into something nefarious.

Often elderly folks prefer small gatherings. When my grandma turned 90 we did a big extended family gathering. It wiped her out for the next month-lots of sleeping and exhaustion from too much excitement. She preferred brief visits with just a few people at a time.

This has nothing to do with elder preferences but establishing a scenario and supporting alibi.

If the police have no one to ask, you can’t possibly be found guilty.

If it’s just the three of you, and you’re living ten minutes away from each other, why is there a need for an Uber? Presumably time is flexible if others are not invited and if you had something to do, you could swing by and pick mom up right after or even have her ride along while you ran your errand.

The food would still be hot if you leave and grab her after you’re finished cooking.

If your kid needed to be dropped off at a sleepover or other event, same thing, logistics can be arranged that include stopping to pick her up.

But if you need to have someone else see her being brought to your home, to prove she was at a dinner with you, then you need the Uber.

There’s very few reasons to require an 84yo to Uber to your home for dinner.

It's not unusual for older people to take ubers in situations like this to go to someone's house, even when they are offered rides. My elderly great aunt was always telling me "I'll hop in a cab!" or "I'll just hop in an uber!" (after she learned to use it) when I invited her over, even if I offered a ride.

It was harder for her to refuse the ride back home because I was right there insisting in person with the keys in my hand.

Anonymous wrote:The demand for Ring camera subscriptions is about to go way up!