Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:2014G have always seemed to attract more kids to tryouts than other age groups; not sure why and this year is no exception. Each year, the 2014s have taken in some girls from other clubs and they've gotten stronger each year. There's still a solid core that's homegrown from MYS Day 1, which is impressive given their chaotic U9 year. Next year will be the first year for the entire age group to have a stable coaching situation, which is impressive given everything else that is going on. Makes me wonder if they'll have better success keeping this age group together for GA.

What was so unstable about the coaching situation this year or last year?

Ummmmm... losing DB last year (who pretty much developed the uLittles girls side) and losing your TD this year to The Onion.

That is a funny way to spell “recruited”.

Huh? Not talking about recruiting, we're talking about coaching stability. Try and keep up with the conversation.

LOL previous poster was stating that DB didn't develop, he supposedly recruited. Keep Up. LOL

Ohhh, he recruited those highly sought after 8 year olds that were in the transfer portal? Got it!

LOL, the PP is a low IQ individual. Trying to imply that db stole all his players. McLean players are almost exclusively homegrown. Period! End of story! Go home and cry now.

What you get with homegrown McLean is a sub par player who lacks the basics( can’t dribble cones) As good as mid RL team.

That's bad news for the 2013 FVU Girls squad, since it is made up entirely of MYS players.

But, but, but they are not part of the wonderful alliance we created! How could they get so many girls in? Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!

2013? Who is looking at 2013 now? A lot of changes happen at puberty when kick , push run does not cut it anymore. Don’t get too excited at the U little because soccer is not about the strongest kid and talked kid rules.

Kick, push, run? At McLean? Maybe YOUR club does (whichever lame Onion alliance team you belong to). Project much?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:2014G have always seemed to attract more kids to tryouts than other age groups; not sure why and this year is no exception. Each year, the 2014s have taken in some girls from other clubs and they've gotten stronger each year. There's still a solid core that's homegrown from MYS Day 1, which is impressive given their chaotic U9 year. Next year will be the first year for the entire age group to have a stable coaching situation, which is impressive given everything else that is going on. Makes me wonder if they'll have better success keeping this age group together for GA.

What was so unstable about the coaching situation this year or last year?

Ummmmm... losing DB last year (who pretty much developed the uLittles girls side) and losing your TD this year to The Onion.

That is a funny way to spell “recruited”.

Huh? Not talking about recruiting, we're talking about coaching stability. Try and keep up with the conversation.

LOL previous poster was stating that DB didn't develop, he supposedly recruited. Keep Up. LOL

Ohhh, he recruited those highly sought after 8 year olds that were in the transfer portal? Got it!

LOL, the PP is a low IQ individual. Trying to imply that db stole all his players. McLean players are almost exclusively homegrown. Period! End of story! Go home and cry now.

What you get with homegrown McLean is a sub par player who lacks the basics( can’t dribble cones) As good as mid RL team.

That's bad news for the 2013 FVU Girls squad, since it is made up entirely of MYS players.

But, but, but they are not part of the wonderful alliance we created! How could they get so many girls in? Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!

2013? Who is looking at 2013 now? A lot of changes happen at puberty when kick , push run does not cut it anymore. Don’t get too excited at the U little because soccer is not about the strongest kid and talked kid rules.

We have played that 2013 Mclean team a lot. For the most part the girls are actually on the smaller side, but they will slice and dice you with their passing. They definitely don't kick and run.

Exactly! PP is not very smart person talking about MYS being push and kick. Anyone that has played against MYS or played for MYS knows the style you will get is ball control and passing. That happens from a young age at MYS.

Again, it is 2013. That is 9 v 9. Watch them play 11 v 11 next year and see if you will see the same style. Soccer is 90% conditioning. Time will tell. So many teams were looking like Barca at 9v9 then the reality hits at 11 v 11.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:2014G have always seemed to attract more kids to tryouts than other age groups; not sure why and this year is no exception. Each year, the 2014s have taken in some girls from other clubs and they've gotten stronger each year. There's still a solid core that's homegrown from MYS Day 1, which is impressive given their chaotic U9 year. Next year will be the first year for the entire age group to have a stable coaching situation, which is impressive given everything else that is going on. Makes me wonder if they'll have better success keeping this age group together for GA.

What was so unstable about the coaching situation this year or last year?

Ummmmm... losing DB last year (who pretty much developed the uLittles girls side) and losing your TD this year to The Onion.

That is a funny way to spell “recruited”.

Huh? Not talking about recruiting, we're talking about coaching stability. Try and keep up with the conversation.

LOL previous poster was stating that DB didn't develop, he supposedly recruited. Keep Up. LOL

Ohhh, he recruited those highly sought after 8 year olds that were in the transfer portal? Got it!

LOL, the PP is a low IQ individual. Trying to imply that db stole all his players. McLean players are almost exclusively homegrown. Period! End of story! Go home and cry now.

What you get with homegrown McLean is a sub par player who lacks the basics( can’t dribble cones) As good as mid RL team.

That's bad news for the 2013 FVU Girls squad, since it is made up entirely of MYS players.

But, but, but they are not part of the wonderful alliance we created! How could they get so many girls in? Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!

2013? Who is looking at 2013 now? A lot of changes happen at puberty when kick , push run does not cut it anymore. Don’t get too excited at the U little because soccer is not about the strongest kid and talked kid rules.

We have played that 2013 Mclean team a lot. For the most part the girls are actually on the smaller side, but they will slice and dice you with their passing. They definitely don't kick and run.

Exactly! PP is not very smart person talking about MYS being push and kick. Anyone that has played against MYS or played for MYS knows the style you will get is ball control and passing. That happens from a young age at MYS.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:2014G have always seemed to attract more kids to tryouts than other age groups; not sure why and this year is no exception. Each year, the 2014s have taken in some girls from other clubs and they've gotten stronger each year. There's still a solid core that's homegrown from MYS Day 1, which is impressive given their chaotic U9 year. Next year will be the first year for the entire age group to have a stable coaching situation, which is impressive given everything else that is going on. Makes me wonder if they'll have better success keeping this age group together for GA.

What was so unstable about the coaching situation this year or last year?

Ummmmm... losing DB last year (who pretty much developed the uLittles girls side) and losing your TD this year to The Onion.

That is a funny way to spell “recruited”.

Huh? Not talking about recruiting, we're talking about coaching stability. Try and keep up with the conversation.

LOL previous poster was stating that DB didn't develop, he supposedly recruited. Keep Up. LOL

Ohhh, he recruited those highly sought after 8 year olds that were in the transfer portal? Got it!

LOL, the PP is a low IQ individual. Trying to imply that db stole all his players. McLean players are almost exclusively homegrown. Period! End of story! Go home and cry now.

What you get with homegrown McLean is a sub par player who lacks the basics( can’t dribble cones) As good as mid RL team.

That's bad news for the 2013 FVU Girls squad, since it is made up entirely of MYS players.

But, but, but they are not part of the wonderful alliance we created! How could they get so many girls in? Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!

2013? Who is looking at 2013 now? A lot of changes happen at puberty when kick , push run does not cut it anymore. Don’t get too excited at the U little because soccer is not about the strongest kid and talked kid rules.

We have played that 2013 Mclean team a lot. For the most part the girls are actually on the smaller side, but they will slice and dice you with their passing. They definitely don't kick and run.

Exactly! PP is not very smart person talking about MYS being push and kick. Anyone that has played against MYS or played for MYS knows the style you will get is ball control and passing. That happens from a young age at MYS.

MYS teams push and kick plenty. My girl is a little older so, she hasn't played McLean proper recently because they were basically rec+ for the last few years at older ages. (No. Union and all it's iterations don't count)

However, their "best players" didn't half love a two handed straight arm shove in the back.

P.S Her team used to regularly embarrass the McLean "Top team." Eagerly awaiting your reaponse about how McLean is better than those teams with "poor non-white" players.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:2014G have always seemed to attract more kids to tryouts than other age groups; not sure why and this year is no exception. Each year, the 2014s have taken in some girls from other clubs and they've gotten stronger each year. There's still a solid core that's homegrown from MYS Day 1, which is impressive given their chaotic U9 year. Next year will be the first year for the entire age group to have a stable coaching situation, which is impressive given everything else that is going on. Makes me wonder if they'll have better success keeping this age group together for GA.

What was so unstable about the coaching situation this year or last year?

Ummmmm... losing DB last year (who pretty much developed the uLittles girls side) and losing your TD this year to The Onion.

That is a funny way to spell “recruited”.

Huh? Not talking about recruiting, we're talking about coaching stability. Try and keep up with the conversation.

LOL previous poster was stating that DB didn't develop, he supposedly recruited. Keep Up. LOL

Ohhh, he recruited those highly sought after 8 year olds that were in the transfer portal? Got it!

LOL, the PP is a low IQ individual. Trying to imply that db stole all his players. McLean players are almost exclusively homegrown. Period! End of story! Go home and cry now.

What you get with homegrown McLean is a sub par player who lacks the basics( can’t dribble cones) As good as mid RL team.

That's bad news for the 2013 FVU Girls squad, since it is made up entirely of MYS players.

But, but, but they are not part of the wonderful alliance we created! How could they get so many girls in? Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!

2013? Who is looking at 2013 now? A lot of changes happen at puberty when kick , push run does not cut it anymore. Don’t get too excited at the U little because soccer is not about the strongest kid and talked kid rules.

We have played that 2013 Mclean team a lot. For the most part the girls are actually on the smaller side, but they will slice and dice you with their passing. They definitely don't kick and run.

Exactly! PP is not very smart person talking about MYS being push and kick. Anyone that has played against MYS or played for MYS knows the style you will get is ball control and passing. That happens from a young age at MYS.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:2014G have always seemed to attract more kids to tryouts than other age groups; not sure why and this year is no exception. Each year, the 2014s have taken in some girls from other clubs and they've gotten stronger each year. There's still a solid core that's homegrown from MYS Day 1, which is impressive given their chaotic U9 year. Next year will be the first year for the entire age group to have a stable coaching situation, which is impressive given everything else that is going on. Makes me wonder if they'll have better success keeping this age group together for GA.

What was so unstable about the coaching situation this year or last year?

Ummmmm... losing DB last year (who pretty much developed the uLittles girls side) and losing your TD this year to The Onion.

That is a funny way to spell “recruited”.

Huh? Not talking about recruiting, we're talking about coaching stability. Try and keep up with the conversation.

LOL previous poster was stating that DB didn't develop, he supposedly recruited. Keep Up. LOL

Ohhh, he recruited those highly sought after 8 year olds that were in the transfer portal? Got it!

LOL, the PP is a low IQ individual. Trying to imply that db stole all his players. McLean players are almost exclusively homegrown. Period! End of story! Go home and cry now.

What you get with homegrown McLean is a sub par player who lacks the basics( can’t dribble cones) As good as mid RL team.

That's bad news for the 2013 FVU Girls squad, since it is made up entirely of MYS players.

But, but, but they are not part of the wonderful alliance we created! How could they get so many girls in? Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!

2013? Who is looking at 2013 now? A lot of changes happen at puberty when kick , push run does not cut it anymore. Don’t get too excited at the U little because soccer is not about the strongest kid and talked kid rules.

We have played that 2013 Mclean team a lot. For the most part the girls are actually on the smaller side, but they will slice and dice you with their passing. They definitely don't kick and run.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:2014G have always seemed to attract more kids to tryouts than other age groups; not sure why and this year is no exception. Each year, the 2014s have taken in some girls from other clubs and they've gotten stronger each year. There's still a solid core that's homegrown from MYS Day 1, which is impressive given their chaotic U9 year. Next year will be the first year for the entire age group to have a stable coaching situation, which is impressive given everything else that is going on. Makes me wonder if they'll have better success keeping this age group together for GA.

What was so unstable about the coaching situation this year or last year?

Ummmmm... losing DB last year (who pretty much developed the uLittles girls side) and losing your TD this year to The Onion.

That is a funny way to spell “recruited”.

Huh? Not talking about recruiting, we're talking about coaching stability. Try and keep up with the conversation.

LOL previous poster was stating that DB didn't develop, he supposedly recruited. Keep Up. LOL

Ohhh, he recruited those highly sought after 8 year olds that were in the transfer portal? Got it!

LOL, the PP is a low IQ individual. Trying to imply that db stole all his players. McLean players are almost exclusively homegrown. Period! End of story! Go home and cry now.

What you get with homegrown McLean is a sub par player who lacks the basics( can’t dribble cones) As good as mid RL team.

That's bad news for the 2013 FVU Girls squad, since it is made up entirely of MYS players.

But, but, but they are not part of the wonderful alliance we created! How could they get so many girls in? Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!

2013? Who is looking at 2013 now? A lot of changes happen at puberty when kick , push run does not cut it anymore. Don’t get too excited at the U little because soccer is not about the strongest kid and talked kid rules.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:2014G have always seemed to attract more kids to tryouts than other age groups; not sure why and this year is no exception. Each year, the 2014s have taken in some girls from other clubs and they've gotten stronger each year. There's still a solid core that's homegrown from MYS Day 1, which is impressive given their chaotic U9 year. Next year will be the first year for the entire age group to have a stable coaching situation, which is impressive given everything else that is going on. Makes me wonder if they'll have better success keeping this age group together for GA.

What was so unstable about the coaching situation this year or last year?

Ummmmm... losing DB last year (who pretty much developed the uLittles girls side) and losing your TD this year to The Onion.

That is a funny way to spell “recruited”.

Huh? Not talking about recruiting, we're talking about coaching stability. Try and keep up with the conversation.

LOL previous poster was stating that DB didn't develop, he supposedly recruited. Keep Up. LOL

Ohhh, he recruited those highly sought after 8 year olds that were in the transfer portal? Got it!

LOL, the PP is a low IQ individual. Trying to imply that db stole all his players. McLean players are almost exclusively homegrown. Period! End of story! Go home and cry now.

What you get with homegrown McLean is a sub par player who lacks the basics( can’t dribble cones) As good as mid RL team.

That's bad news for the 2013 FVU Girls squad, since it is made up entirely of MYS players.

But, but, but they are not part of the wonderful alliance we created! How could they get so many girls in? Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!

2013? Who is looking at 2013 now? A lot of changes happen at puberty when kick , push run does not cut it anymore. Don’t get too excited at the U little because soccer is not about the strongest kid and talked kid rules.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:2014G have always seemed to attract more kids to tryouts than other age groups; not sure why and this year is no exception. Each year, the 2014s have taken in some girls from other clubs and they've gotten stronger each year. There's still a solid core that's homegrown from MYS Day 1, which is impressive given their chaotic U9 year. Next year will be the first year for the entire age group to have a stable coaching situation, which is impressive given everything else that is going on. Makes me wonder if they'll have better success keeping this age group together for GA.

What was so unstable about the coaching situation this year or last year?

Ummmmm... losing DB last year (who pretty much developed the uLittles girls side) and losing your TD this year to The Onion.

That is a funny way to spell “recruited”.

Huh? Not talking about recruiting, we're talking about coaching stability. Try and keep up with the conversation.

LOL previous poster was stating that DB didn't develop, he supposedly recruited. Keep Up. LOL

Ohhh, he recruited those highly sought after 8 year olds that were in the transfer portal? Got it!

LOL, the PP is a low IQ individual. Trying to imply that db stole all his players. McLean players are almost exclusively homegrown. Period! End of story! Go home and cry now.

What you get with homegrown McLean is a sub par player who lacks the basics( can’t dribble cones) As good as mid RL team.

That's bad news for the 2013 FVU Girls squad, since it is made up entirely of MYS players.

But, but, but they are not part of the wonderful alliance we created! How could they get so many girls in? Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:2014G have always seemed to attract more kids to tryouts than other age groups; not sure why and this year is no exception. Each year, the 2014s have taken in some girls from other clubs and they've gotten stronger each year. There's still a solid core that's homegrown from MYS Day 1, which is impressive given their chaotic U9 year. Next year will be the first year for the entire age group to have a stable coaching situation, which is impressive given everything else that is going on. Makes me wonder if they'll have better success keeping this age group together for GA.

What was so unstable about the coaching situation this year or last year?

Ummmmm... losing DB last year (who pretty much developed the uLittles girls side) and losing your TD this year to The Onion.

That is a funny way to spell “recruited”.

Huh? Not talking about recruiting, we're talking about coaching stability. Try and keep up with the conversation.

LOL previous poster was stating that DB didn't develop, he supposedly recruited. Keep Up. LOL

Ohhh, he recruited those highly sought after 8 year olds that were in the transfer portal? Got it!

LOL, the PP is a low IQ individual. Trying to imply that db stole all his players. McLean players are almost exclusively homegrown. Period! End of story! Go home and cry now.

What you get with homegrown McLean is a sub par player who lacks the basics( can’t dribble cones) As good as mid RL team.

That's bad news for the 2013 FVU Girls squad, since it is made up entirely of MYS players.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:2014G have always seemed to attract more kids to tryouts than other age groups; not sure why and this year is no exception. Each year, the 2014s have taken in some girls from other clubs and they've gotten stronger each year. There's still a solid core that's homegrown from MYS Day 1, which is impressive given their chaotic U9 year. Next year will be the first year for the entire age group to have a stable coaching situation, which is impressive given everything else that is going on. Makes me wonder if they'll have better success keeping this age group together for GA.

What was so unstable about the coaching situation this year or last year?

Ummmmm... losing DB last year (who pretty much developed the uLittles girls side) and losing your TD this year to The Onion.

That is a funny way to spell “recruited”.

Huh? Not talking about recruiting, we're talking about coaching stability. Try and keep up with the conversation.

LOL previous poster was stating that DB didn't develop, he supposedly recruited. Keep Up. LOL

Ohhh, he recruited those highly sought after 8 year olds that were in the transfer portal? Got it!

LOL, the PP is a low IQ individual. Trying to imply that db stole all his players. McLean players are almost exclusively homegrown. Period! End of story! Go home and cry now.

What you get with homegrown McLean is a sub par player who lacks the basics( can’t dribble cones) As good as mid RL team.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:2014G have always seemed to attract more kids to tryouts than other age groups; not sure why and this year is no exception. Each year, the 2014s have taken in some girls from other clubs and they've gotten stronger each year. There's still a solid core that's homegrown from MYS Day 1, which is impressive given their chaotic U9 year. Next year will be the first year for the entire age group to have a stable coaching situation, which is impressive given everything else that is going on. Makes me wonder if they'll have better success keeping this age group together for GA.

What was so unstable about the coaching situation this year or last year?

Ummmmm... losing DB last year (who pretty much developed the uLittles girls side) and losing your TD this year to The Onion.

That is a funny way to spell “recruited”.

Huh? Not talking about recruiting, we're talking about coaching stability. Try and keep up with the conversation.

LOL previous poster was stating that DB didn't develop, he supposedly recruited. Keep Up. LOL

Ohhh, he recruited those highly sought after 8 year olds that were in the transfer portal? Got it!

LOL, the PP is a low IQ individual. Trying to imply that db stole all his players. McLean players are almost exclusively homegrown. Period! End of story! Go home and cry now.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:2014G have always seemed to attract more kids to tryouts than other age groups; not sure why and this year is no exception. Each year, the 2014s have taken in some girls from other clubs and they've gotten stronger each year. There's still a solid core that's homegrown from MYS Day 1, which is impressive given their chaotic U9 year. Next year will be the first year for the entire age group to have a stable coaching situation, which is impressive given everything else that is going on. Makes me wonder if they'll have better success keeping this age group together for GA.

What was so unstable about the coaching situation this year or last year?

Ummmmm... losing DB last year (who pretty much developed the uLittles girls side) and losing your TD this year to The Onion.

That is a funny way to spell “recruited”.

Huh? Not talking about recruiting, we're talking about coaching stability. Try and keep up with the conversation.

LOL previous poster was stating that DB didn't develop, he supposedly recruited. Keep Up. LOL

Ohhh, he recruited those highly sought after 8 year olds that were in the transfer portal? Got it!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:2014G have always seemed to attract more kids to tryouts than other age groups; not sure why and this year is no exception. Each year, the 2014s have taken in some girls from other clubs and they've gotten stronger each year. There's still a solid core that's homegrown from MYS Day 1, which is impressive given their chaotic U9 year. Next year will be the first year for the entire age group to have a stable coaching situation, which is impressive given everything else that is going on. Makes me wonder if they'll have better success keeping this age group together for GA.

What was so unstable about the coaching situation this year or last year?

Ummmmm... losing DB last year (who pretty much developed the uLittles girls side) and losing your TD this year to The Onion.

That is a funny way to spell “recruited”.

Huh? Not talking about recruiting, we're talking about coaching stability. Try and keep up with the conversation.

LOL previous poster was stating that DB didn't develop, he supposedly recruited. Keep Up. LOL