Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Adam Housley has been pretty accurate with his reporting.

No, the interview prep notes weren't exculpatory. Neither were the file notes.

Sorry.

Look - you might think that the prosecutors and FBI agents Mueller hired and those in high level positions in the FBI are as pure as the driven snow, but you are wrong.
Yeah - even "career civil servants" and attorneys can be corrupt. They took actions that were contrary to their job and responsibilities in order to "get the man." You just can't admit that actions they took were unethical and, in some cases, illegal, because to you - the end justifies the means. As long as it makes Trump, or anyone in his administration, look corrupt or criminal, you are fine with it. Even if what they did was wrong.

The FBI and our IC go after bad guys. Trump has been laundering Russian money for decades. Flynn was on the turkish and Russian payroll. Manafort worked against US interests and aligned with Russia in Ukraine.

Who are the bad guys? Why are you thinking Trump, Flynn and Manafort are the good guys here? It makes no sense. The career people and law enforcement were doing their jobs - monitoring the bad guys. The problem? The bad guys were dealing with certain Americans, including current and former Trump people. And yet, Fox News has people like you brainwashed to be against our IC and Law Enforcement because they have twisted the facts and contorted legal opinion in such a way that people like you are doing mental pretzels to say this is ok.

It isn't ok. please understand what is happening. Our country is being taken over by people whose allegiance are not to our flag or our country. You can see this manifest from everything including the response to the pandemic, the shifting alliances - what did the US get for pulling out of the TPP or leaving Syria? Nothing. What did Trump get? Money. Money from the Turks, money from the Chinese, money from the Saudi's. All at the expense of the US Treasury and the goodwill of the once great international force that was the United States of America.

We are not better now and we are not going to be great again under this "leadership" - rising unemployment, rising death, cities in mayhem, shrinking GDP...who does this favor? Because it isn't the American people.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Adam Housley has been pretty accurate with his reporting.

No, the interview prep notes weren't exculpatory. Neither were the file notes.

Sorry.

Look - you might think that the prosecutors and FBI agents Mueller hired and those in high level positions in the FBI are as pure as the driven snow, but you are wrong.
Yeah - even "career civil servants" and attorneys can be corrupt. They took actions that were contrary to their job and responsibilities in order to "get the man." You just can't admit that actions they took were unethical and, in some cases, illegal, because to you - the end justifies the means. As long as it makes Trump, or anyone in his administration, look corrupt or criminal, you are fine with it. Even if what they did was wrong.

The FBI and our IC go after bad guys. Trump has been laundering Russian money for decades. Flynn was on the turkish and Russian payroll. Manafort worked against US interests and aligned with Russia in Ukraine.

Who are the bad guys? Why are you thinking Trump, Flynn and Manafort are the good guys here? It makes no sense. The career people and law enforcement were doing their jobs - monitoring the bad guys. The problem? The bad guys were dealing with certain Americans, including current and former Trump people. And yet, Fox News has people like you brainwashed to be against our IC and Law Enforcement because they have twisted the facts and contorted legal opinion in such a way that people like you are doing mental pretzels to say this is ok.

It isn't ok. please understand what is happening. Our country is being taken over by people whose allegiance are not to our flag or our country. You can see this manifest from everything including the response to the pandemic, the shifting alliances - what did the US get for pulling out of the TPP or leaving Syria? Nothing. What did Trump get? Money. Money from the Turks, money from the Chinese, money from the Saudi's. All at the expense of the US Treasury and the goodwill of the once great international force that was the United States of America.

We are not better now and we are not going to be great again under this "leadership" - rising unemployment, rising death, cities in mayhem, shrinking GDP...who does this favor? Because it isn't the American people.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Adam Housley has been pretty accurate with his reporting.

No, the interview prep notes weren't exculpatory. Neither were the file notes.

Sorry.

Look - you might think that the prosecutors and FBI agents Mueller hired and those in high level positions in the FBI are as pure as the driven snow, but you are wrong.
Yeah - even "career civil servants" and attorneys can be corrupt. They took actions that were contrary to their job and responsibilities in order to "get the man." You just can't admit that actions they took were unethical and, in some cases, illegal, because to you - the end justifies the means. As long as it makes Trump, or anyone in his administration, look corrupt or criminal, you are fine with it. Even if what they did was wrong.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Adam Housley has been pretty accurate with his reporting.

No, the interview prep notes weren't exculpatory. Neither were the file notes.

Sorry.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Adam Housley has been pretty accurate with his reporting.

No, the interview prep notes weren't exculpatory. Neither were the file notes.

Sorry.

Sure they were. Throw in the "no derogatory information" and closing of Crossfire Razor directive, as well.

That's not what "exculpatory" means. If you don't know what it means, then maybe you should find out.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Adam Housley has been pretty accurate with his reporting.

No, the interview prep notes weren't exculpatory. Neither were the file notes.

Sorry.

Sure they were. Throw in the "no derogatory information" and closing of Crossfire Razor directive, as well.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Adam Housley has been pretty accurate with his reporting.

No, the interview prep notes weren't exculpatory. Neither were the file notes.

Sorry.

Anonymous wrote:Adam Housley has been pretty accurate with his reporting.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

It is correct. Boente is career. He can be reassigned, but not fired.

What about for cause?

It would need to go through a standards review, which usually take months/years.

And, Wray/Barr/Trump wouldn't want that because it would force Boente to provide the goods on his work. Under oath.

What if charges are involved?

Anonymous wrote:He was asked to resign and did so.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

It is correct. Boente is career. He can be reassigned, but not fired.

What about for cause?

It would need to go through a standards review, which usually take months/years.

And, Wray/Barr/Trump wouldn't want that because it would force Boente to provide the goods on his work. Under oath.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Barr is trying to force Dana Boente out of the FBI

"Boente also said in a recently leaked memo that material put into the public record about Flynn was not exculpatory for the former national security advisor."

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/fbi-s-top-lawyer-dana-boente-ousted-amid-fox-news-n1219721

Well, this is reason enough....

"Boente signed one of the warrants renewing the FBI's authority to surveil Flynn. The warrants, known as FISA warrants, were renewed several times and had to be approved by a judge."

This NEVER happened. There were never any FISA warrants on Flynn. I don't know if the reporter screwed up, or if someone took bad information from the source, but that is an outright falsehood.