Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anyone have Pacer access? From 12/04/24
INDICTMENT as to JAMES CARROLL (1) count(s) 1, 2. (FORFEITURE ALLEGATION) (zljn)
His case has been assigned to Judge Mehta (district court judge). A bare-bones indictment (the norm) was filed on the 4th (2 substantive counts (attempted sexual exploitation of a child and attempted coercion and enticement of a minor - both citing November 5, 2024 to November 14, 2024 as the time period during which the offenses were committed) and a forfeiture count). His magistrate judge case, therefore, has been closed, as is standard. He remains represented by the Federal Public Defender's Office, and it is likely there will be a superseding indictment once the investigation is completed, given they have his electronic devices and, presumably, access to the online accounts.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are countless NCRC apologists on this thread who can’t seem to fathom that there was a culture that ignored red flag or didn’t follow proper procedures all the time (this is different than saying people knew JC was a pedo and ignored that). It’s fine that current and alum parents believe this. But what I believe is going to happen is that they will completely clean house at NCRC and get rid of a ton of administrators who were there under JC’s tenure. Maybe it’s my MBA speaking, but this would be a standard reaction to a scandal this big and this gross. Current families might see the “magic” of NCRC, but remember they need to recruit new families…new families need a lot of reassurance when it comes to where they are sending their very young children.
He had a secret disturbing online life—what school procedures are you suggesting would have caught that? There was a firewall so he likely did most illicit activity on his own devices. What is it that you think could have been done?
He was using his own device. What should the school have done. Firewall catches the school devices.
No evidence that he never used school devices, but nice try.
You’d never get a job as a detective. Your theories are whacked.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are countless NCRC apologists on this thread who can’t seem to fathom that there was a culture that ignored red flag or didn’t follow proper procedures all the time (this is different than saying people knew JC was a pedo and ignored that). It’s fine that current and alum parents believe this. But what I believe is going to happen is that they will completely clean house at NCRC and get rid of a ton of administrators who were there under JC’s tenure. Maybe it’s my MBA speaking, but this would be a standard reaction to a scandal this big and this gross. Current families might see the “magic” of NCRC, but remember they need to recruit new families…new families need a lot of reassurance when it comes to where they are sending their very young children.
He had a secret disturbing online life—what school procedures are you suggesting would have caught that? There was a firewall so he likely did most illicit activity on his own devices. What is it that you think could have been done?
He was using his own device. What should the school have done. Firewall catches the school devices.
No evidence that he never used school devices, but nice try.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anyone have Pacer access? From 12/04/24
INDICTMENT as to JAMES CARROLL (1) count(s) 1, 2. (FORFEITURE ALLEGATION) (zljn)
His case has been assigned to Judge Mehta (district court judge). A bare-bones indictment (the norm) was filed on the 4th (2 substantive counts (attempted sexual exploitation of a child and attempted coercion and enticement of a minor - both citing November 5, 2024 to November 14, 2024 as the time period during which the offenses were committed) and a forfeiture count). His magistrate judge case, therefore, has been closed, as is standard. He remains represented by the Federal Public Defender's Office, and it is likely there will be a superseding indictment once the investigation is completed, given they have his electronic devices and, presumably, access to the online accounts.
Anonymous wrote:Anyone have Pacer access? From 12/04/24
INDICTMENT as to JAMES CARROLL (1) count(s) 1, 2. (FORFEITURE ALLEGATION) (zljn)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are countless NCRC apologists on this thread who can’t seem to fathom that there was a culture that ignored red flag or didn’t follow proper procedures all the time (this is different than saying people knew JC was a pedo and ignored that). It’s fine that current and alum parents believe this. But what I believe is going to happen is that they will completely clean house at NCRC and get rid of a ton of administrators who were there under JC’s tenure. Maybe it’s my MBA speaking, but this would be a standard reaction to a scandal this big and this gross. Current families might see the “magic” of NCRC, but remember they need to recruit new families…new families need a lot of reassurance when it comes to where they are sending their very young children.
He had a secret disturbing online life—what school procedures are you suggesting would have caught that? There was a firewall so he likely did most illicit activity on his own devices. What is it that you think could have been done?
He was using his own device. What should the school have done. Firewall catches the school devices.
No evidence that he never used school devices, but nice try.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are countless NCRC apologists on this thread who can’t seem to fathom that there was a culture that ignored red flag or didn’t follow proper procedures all the time (this is different than saying people knew JC was a pedo and ignored that). It’s fine that current and alum parents believe this. But what I believe is going to happen is that they will completely clean house at NCRC and get rid of a ton of administrators who were there under JC’s tenure. Maybe it’s my MBA speaking, but this would be a standard reaction to a scandal this big and this gross. Current families might see the “magic” of NCRC, but remember they need to recruit new families…new families need a lot of reassurance when it comes to where they are sending their very young children.
He had a secret disturbing online life—what school procedures are you suggesting would have caught that? There was a firewall so he likely did most illicit activity on his own devices. What is it that you think could have been done?
He was using his own device. What should the school have done. Firewall catches the school devices.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are countless NCRC apologists on this thread who can’t seem to fathom that there was a culture that ignored red flag or didn’t follow proper procedures all the time (this is different than saying people knew JC was a pedo and ignored that). It’s fine that current and alum parents believe this. But what I believe is going to happen is that they will completely clean house at NCRC and get rid of a ton of administrators who were there under JC’s tenure. Maybe it’s my MBA speaking, but this would be a standard reaction to a scandal this big and this gross. Current families might see the “magic” of NCRC, but remember they need to recruit new families…new families need a lot of reassurance when it comes to where they are sending their very young children.
He had a secret disturbing online life—what school procedures are you suggesting would have caught that? There was a firewall so he likely did most illicit activity on his own devices. What is it that you think could have been done?
Anonymous wrote:There are countless NCRC apologists on this thread who can’t seem to fathom that there was a culture that ignored red flag or didn’t follow proper procedures all the time (this is different than saying people knew JC was a pedo and ignored that). It’s fine that current and alum parents believe this. But what I believe is going to happen is that they will completely clean house at NCRC and get rid of a ton of administrators who were there under JC’s tenure. Maybe it’s my MBA speaking, but this would be a standard reaction to a scandal this big and this gross. Current families might see the “magic” of NCRC, but remember they need to recruit new families…new families need a lot of reassurance when it comes to where they are sending their very young children.