Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trump got delayed illegally by a district court in Massachusetts telling him not to deport to a third country. Supreme Court sided with Trump. The judge looked at the dissent and claimed his original order stands. Supreme Court sided with Trump again, and said if judge ignored feel free to seek mandamus relief.
Then some of the people filed a claim in DC trying to get an injunction. That judge looked at what the Supreme Court did, and said he wanted no part of it, sent it to the judge in Massachusetts who has no authority. He dismissed the case.
I think those people are on the way to Sudan now.
Illegals, leave now to where you want, or you might end up in Sudan.
How is it reasonable to ship someone to Sudan for the crime of trying to feed their family?
Are we becoming like muslim extremists who would chop a starving person's hand off for stealing a piece of bread? Sure seems that way.
"Trying to feed their family"...........
My god, they accidentally found criminals as they swept up thousands of harmless people?!
Will wonders never cease?
Anonymous wrote:
The Iranian gov't discovered Afghans were unknowingly building drones for israelis inside Iran to be used to assassinate their nuclear scientists. So they just decided to deport 100,000 people a week. That's the number America has deported in 7 months.
Iran deported 450,000 with a lesser budget, far less technological tools and overall inferior deportation infrastructure and you are telling me we can't deport at least a million a month.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trump got delayed illegally by a district court in Massachusetts telling him not to deport to a third country. Supreme Court sided with Trump. The judge looked at the dissent and claimed his original order stands. Supreme Court sided with Trump again, and said if judge ignored feel free to seek mandamus relief.
Then some of the people filed a claim in DC trying to get an injunction. That judge looked at what the Supreme Court did, and said he wanted no part of it, sent it to the judge in Massachusetts who has no authority. He dismissed the case.
I think those people are on the way to Sudan now.
Illegals, leave now to where you want, or you might end up in Sudan.
How is it reasonable to ship someone to Sudan for the crime of trying to feed their family?
Are we becoming like muslim extremists who would chop a starving person's hand off for stealing a piece of bread? Sure seems that way.
"Trying to feed their family"...........
My god, they accidentally found criminals as they swept up thousands of harmless people?!
Will wonders never cease?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trump got delayed illegally by a district court in Massachusetts telling him not to deport to a third country. Supreme Court sided with Trump. The judge looked at the dissent and claimed his original order stands. Supreme Court sided with Trump again, and said if judge ignored feel free to seek mandamus relief.
Then some of the people filed a claim in DC trying to get an injunction. That judge looked at what the Supreme Court did, and said he wanted no part of it, sent it to the judge in Massachusetts who has no authority. He dismissed the case.
I think those people are on the way to Sudan now.
Illegals, leave now to where you want, or you might end up in Sudan.
How is it reasonable to ship someone to Sudan for the crime of trying to feed their family?
Are we becoming like muslim extremists who would chop a starving person's hand off for stealing a piece of bread? Sure seems that way.
"Trying to feed their family"...........
Anonymous wrote:
Correct. It is supposed to be temporary and is not a path to citizenship. However, both Democrat and Republican presidents have tended to extend TPS status, resulting in some groups being here for decades.
I'll be curious to see if Trump targets Salvadoreans next given his close relationship to Bukele.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trump got delayed illegally by a district court in Massachusetts telling him not to deport to a third country. Supreme Court sided with Trump. The judge looked at the dissent and claimed his original order stands. Supreme Court sided with Trump again, and said if judge ignored feel free to seek mandamus relief.
Then some of the people filed a claim in DC trying to get an injunction. That judge looked at what the Supreme Court did, and said he wanted no part of it, sent it to the judge in Massachusetts who has no authority. He dismissed the case.
I think those people are on the way to Sudan now.
Illegals, leave now to where you want, or you might end up in Sudan.
How is it reasonable to ship someone to Sudan for the crime of trying to feed their family?
Are we becoming like muslim extremists who would chop a starving person's hand off for stealing a piece of bread? Sure seems that way.
Anonymous wrote:DP...here is an article
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jul/06/trump-voting-family-canadian-mother-detained-immigration-status
And the reason ICE moves them from facility to facility is that each one can charge the US government (ie taxpayers) for a full day, even if they are only there for a few hours. So each day, ICE is revolving people across facilities while the prison owners reap the rewards.
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
How is it reasonable to ship someone to Sudan for the crime of trying to feed their family?
Sounds like you don't think they should be deported anywhere.
Anonymous wrote:
How is it reasonable to ship someone to Sudan for the crime of trying to feed their family?