Anonymous
07/19/2022 09:35
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Because every doctor I know just elbows people aside for the chance to risk their medical licenses (not to mention the lives of their patients) for the clicks and the lols.
Anonymous
07/19/2022 09:32
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Where are all the pro-life folks? What do you think about these situations? Let's hear from you and how you justify this . . .
I’m in pro life and abortion debate forums and the general consensus is that activist pro choice doctors are purposely withholding lifesaving medical care for the media stories.
Do you just read there to keep up on what those people are saying? I’ve considered doing the same but can’t bring myself to read their nauseating crap.
Anonymous
07/19/2022 09:28
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Where are all the pro-life folks? What do you think about these situations? Let's hear from you and how you justify this . . .
I’m in pro life and abortion debate forums and the general consensus is that activist pro choice doctors are purposely withholding lifesaving medical care for the media stories.
Delusional. None of these problems would even exist if pro-lifers hadn't overturned Roe and now infused the OB/GYN medical profession with a whole host of new legal hazards.
Screw their "consensus." The blame rests solely on the shoulders of the pro-lifers.
Anonymous
07/19/2022 08:38
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Where are all the pro-life folks? What do you think about these situations? Let's hear from you and how you justify this . . .
I’m in pro life and abortion debate forums and the general consensus is that activist pro choice doctors are purposely withholding lifesaving medical care for the media stories.
Proving that they’re as untethered from reality as I always thought they were.
+1
“It’s a hoax”
Anonymous
07/19/2022 08:29
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Where are all the pro-life folks? What do you think about these situations? Let's hear from you and how you justify this . . .
I’m in pro life and abortion debate forums and the general consensus is that activist pro choice doctors are purposely withholding lifesaving medical care for the media stories.
Proving that they’re as untethered from reality as I always thought they were.
Anonymous
07/19/2022 02:00
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Where are all the pro-life folks? What do you think about these situations? Let's hear from you and how you justify this . . .
I’m in pro life and abortion debate forums and the general consensus is that activist pro choice doctors are purposely withholding lifesaving medical care for the media stories.
Don't tempt fate. Have your pregnancy in a state that can attract quality professionals and where the medical professionals can practice the best standards of care.
Anonymous
07/19/2022 00:48
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Where are all the pro-life folks? What do you think about these situations? Let's hear from you and how you justify this . . .
I’m in pro life and abortion debate forums and the general consensus is that activist pro choice doctors are purposely withholding lifesaving medical care for the media stories.
^^ should say I am PC, but this is the only defense I’ve seen them manage to muster up in their mental gymnasium
Anonymous
07/19/2022 00:47
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Where are all the pro-life folks? What do you think about these situations? Let's hear from you and how you justify this . . .
I’m in pro life and abortion debate forums and the general consensus is that activist pro choice doctors are purposely withholding lifesaving medical care for the media stories.
Anonymous
07/18/2022 23:34
Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Here’s another genius at work.
Rubio proposes child support regulations beginning at conception
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/3561573-rubio-proposes-child-support-regulations-beginning-at-conception/
Child support is federal now? Huh.
Anonymous
07/18/2022 22:34
Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here’s another genius at work.
Rubio proposes child support regulations beginning at conception
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/3561573-rubio-proposes-child-support-regulations-beginning-at-conception/
Figures that a majority of republicans don't even support this law.
Of course they don’t. The fire hose of cruelty is supposed to be aimed at women, not men.
Rubio honestly seems like there’s a shred of decency in the body of a Republican and it’s screaming to get out. This bill is an attempt to assuage his guilt, which means he feels guilt which means he recognizes this femicidal fascism is bad.
But he won’t do anything that matters, so we know he’s still a Republican.
Anonymous
07/18/2022 21:09
Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Here’s another genius at work.
Rubio proposes child support regulations beginning at conception
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/3561573-rubio-proposes-child-support-regulations-beginning-at-conception/
Figures that a majority of republicans don't even support this law.
Anonymous
07/18/2022 20:09
Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Here’s another genius at work.
Rubio proposes child support regulations beginning at conception
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/3561573-rubio-proposes-child-support-regulations-beginning-at-conception/
Rubio proposes child support regulations beginning at conception
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/3561573-rubio-proposes-child-support-regulations-beginning-at-conception/
Anonymous
07/18/2022 17:58
Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't understand how the pro life movement can support the ruling. It's MORE than just allowing a life to be born. Life is complex. It's about what happens when mom's life is in danger, the morality of the pregnancy, the health of the baby long-term. You have to wonder if these people are sane who want to outlaw abortion. We even have history as hindsight to review. I just don't get it. For these pro lifers - how do they debate these factual stories of suffering for those unable to receive abortions? What could justify this kind of suffering in this day and age?
Because the cruelty is the point.
I don’t know you and I don’t want to make snap judgments about you, but you’re still using the “pro life” framing even though you obviously understand that there’s nothing pro life about their stance. You have to release your mind from the 1980’s “pro-choice/pro-life” framework. It was never about life, it was always about punishing women for getting rights. The cruelty is the point.
The cruelty is the point. For the religious forced birthers (most of them), there’s a strong biblical reward to punishing women by killing them via pregnancy and delivery. It’s something that literally makes them happy to know that women are dying in service to their true “calling.” Dying slowly in agony, even though there’s a safe, life-saving treatment with decades of use, a political death to please misogynists? That’s what they’re doing. And the forced birthers know this is going to happen. The cruelty is the point.
The GOP is a pestilence on this land. Literally every problem that we face as a nation is either caused by them or worsened by them. They are so fantastically unpopular that have to use propaganda and cheating and they still get fewer votes. They worsen gun death, mental health, health care, health care access. The GOP single-handedly blew up covid numbers across the country because in March 2020 Trump was already pushing to “open” the states (and mocking masking). They worsen global warming and species diversity. They won’t support ending money in politics, they don’t support any workers’ protections or living wages; they don’t even support minimum wages. They claim to oppose immigration but mostly so they can abuse immigrants (and, let’s be honest, brown people in general no matter how long they’ve been here) and they won’t talk about immigration legislation nor will they adequately punish businesses that hire undocumented workers.
The cruelty is the point. It’s fascism, it truly is.
They do love a good martyr.
It’s like a Christian jihad they want to force on others.
Anonymous
07/18/2022 17:54
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Where are all the pro-life folks? What do you think about these situations? Let's hear from you and how you justify this . . .
They’re trying to work up some talking points, but their misogynistic, homicidal policies are such a failure on so many fronts that it’s probably hard for them to form a response.
Or they’re just engaging in the time honored GOP tradition of denying its existence.
1. Pretend it's "Fake News"
2. Await instructions and talking points from FOX News
3. Repeat
Exactly. They haven’t been told what to think/say next.
Until then, “it’s a hoax!”
Anonymous
07/18/2022 17:50
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Where are all the pro-life folks? What do you think about these situations? Let's hear from you and how you justify this . . .
They’re trying to work up some talking points, but their misogynistic, homicidal policies are such a failure on so many fronts that it’s probably hard for them to form a response.
Or they’re just engaging in the time honored GOP tradition of denying its existence.
1. Pretend it's "Fake News"
2. Await instructions and talking points from FOX News
3. Repeat