Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
This is actually a bit old news. The EU passed legislation earlier this year that Twitter was aware could have implications for content. The EU has been high on its earlier GDPR legislation dictating internet privacy regulation throughout the world and their latest DORA legislation is an attempt to replicate that success.
Twitter could block EU IP addresses and Europeans who want access could do so through VPNs rather than bend to EU laws on content that they want to impose on the world.
Why would twitter block EU IP addresses. If EU wants to ban it, wouldn't it be on the EU to block their people from accessing it? Like China?
EU wants compliance with the GDPR (and will enforce it). If Twitter doesn't want to comply, then they need to opt out of the EU.
There was someone on this forum arguing this site was not complying with GDPR and that he was in violation of EU law. The owner of the site didn't seem to care.
The site is still operating, and I think still not in compliance with GDPR.
So perhaps 'need to opt out of the EU' isn't so needed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
This is actually a bit old news. The EU passed legislation earlier this year that Twitter was aware could have implications for content. The EU has been high on its earlier GDPR legislation dictating internet privacy regulation throughout the world and their latest DORA legislation is an attempt to replicate that success.
Twitter could block EU IP addresses and Europeans who want access could do so through VPNs rather than bend to EU laws on content that they want to impose on the world.
Why would twitter block EU IP addresses. If EU wants to ban it, wouldn't it be on the EU to block their people from accessing it? Like China?
EU wants compliance with the GDPR (and will enforce it). If Twitter doesn't want to comply, then they need to opt out of the EU.
There was someone on this forum arguing this site was not complying with GDPR and that he was in violation of EU law. The owner of the site didn't seem to care.
The site is still operating, and I think still not in compliance with GDPR.
So perhaps 'need to opt out of the EU' isn't so needed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
This is actually a bit old news. The EU passed legislation earlier this year that Twitter was aware could have implications for content. The EU has been high on its earlier GDPR legislation dictating internet privacy regulation throughout the world and their latest DORA legislation is an attempt to replicate that success.
Twitter could block EU IP addresses and Europeans who want access could do so through VPNs rather than bend to EU laws on content that they want to impose on the world.
Why would twitter block EU IP addresses. If EU wants to ban it, wouldn't it be on the EU to block their people from accessing it? Like China?
EU wants compliance with the GDPR (and will enforce it). If Twitter doesn't want to comply, then they need to opt out of the EU.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
This is actually a bit old news. The EU passed legislation earlier this year that Twitter was aware could have implications for content. The EU has been high on its earlier GDPR legislation dictating internet privacy regulation throughout the world and their latest DORA legislation is an attempt to replicate that success.
Twitter could block EU IP addresses and Europeans who want access could do so through VPNs rather than bend to EU laws on content that they want to impose on the world.
Why would twitter block EU IP addresses. If EU wants to ban it, wouldn't it be on the EU to block their people from accessing it? Like China?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Or Tim Cook realized how bad it would be for Apple if Tesla developed its own phone. Apple has been hinting at a car for over a decade, but either couldn't do it, or the margins weren't worth it.
Could have simply just been some underling at Apple trying to make calls above their station. Cook then came in to clean up the mess and clarify and/or threw underling under the bus to save face with Musk.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
This is actually a bit old news. The EU passed legislation earlier this year that Twitter was aware could have implications for content. The EU has been high on its earlier GDPR legislation dictating internet privacy regulation throughout the world and their latest DORA legislation is an attempt to replicate that success.
Twitter could block EU IP addresses and Europeans who want access could do so through VPNs rather than bend to EU laws on content that they want to impose on the world.
Why would twitter block EU IP addresses. If EU wants to ban it, wouldn't it be on the EU to block their people from accessing it? Like China?
Anonymous wrote:
This is actually a bit old news. The EU passed legislation earlier this year that Twitter was aware could have implications for content. The EU has been high on its earlier GDPR legislation dictating internet privacy regulation throughout the world and their latest DORA legislation is an attempt to replicate that success.
Twitter could block EU IP addresses and Europeans who want access could do so through VPNs rather than bend to EU laws on content that they want to impose on the world.
Anonymous wrote:
This is actually a bit old news. The EU passed legislation earlier this year that Twitter was aware could have implications for content. The EU has been high on its earlier GDPR legislation dictating internet privacy regulation throughout the world and their latest DORA legislation is an attempt to replicate that success.
Twitter could block EU IP addresses and Europeans who want access could do so through VPNs rather than bend to EU laws on content that they want to impose on the world.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Or Tim Cook realized how bad it would be for Apple if Tesla developed its own phone. Apple has been hinting at a car for over a decade, but either couldn't do it, or the margins weren't worth it.
Could have simply just been some underling at Apple trying to make calls above their station. Cook then came in to clean up the mess and clarify and/or threw underling under the bus to save face with Musk.
Or it’s just Elon being the pathological liar he always is.
No need to twist yourself into pretzels, fanboys. The simple explanation is usually the right one.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Or Tim Cook realized how bad it would be for Apple if Tesla developed its own phone. Apple has been hinting at a car for over a decade, but either couldn't do it, or the margins weren't worth it.
Could have simply just been some underling at Apple trying to make calls above their station. Cook then came in to clean up the mess and clarify and/or threw underling under the bus to save face with Musk.
Anonymous wrote:
Or Tim Cook realized how bad it would be for Apple if Tesla developed its own phone. Apple has been hinting at a car for over a decade, but either couldn't do it, or the margins weren't worth it.