Anonymous wrote:The BBB gave so much funding to ICE that it now has a budget larger than almost every major military in the world, including Israel's. So, yes, expensive. But totally worth it if we deport hard-working parents who have been living peacefully in this country for years and paying into Social Security!
Anonymous wrote:Trump got delayed illegally by a district court in Massachusetts telling him not to deport to a third country. Supreme Court sided with Trump. The judge looked at the dissent and claimed his original order stands. Supreme Court sided with Trump again, and said if judge ignored feel free to seek mandamus relief.
Then some of the people filed a claim in DC trying to get an injunction. That judge looked at what the Supreme Court did, and said he wanted no part of it, sent it to the judge in Massachusetts who has no authority. He dismissed the case.
I think those people are on the way to Sudan now.
Illegals, leave now to where you want, or you might end up in Sudan.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All this money wasted
Democrats' position is that someone who gets to America illegally can stay, except maybe we'll deport them if they commit another crime.
Anonymous wrote:All this money wasted
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This article outlines the Trump Administration plans for mass deportation. While in part relying on a “remain in Mexico” policy, it also requires the construction of an untold number of new detention facilities.
https://apple.news/Azc_QxwuoTymMEiX8wszEtA
First, this is going to take years to construct, and will line government contractors pockets with the overhead. Second, US citizens will be responsible for housing, food and transportation costs during the time period for adjudication. It seems like this set up is aimed to further privatize the deportation process at an enormous expense to American taxpayers.
Why is this more viable than having immigrants work while awaiting adjudication? Increase tracking capabilities and require employers of immigrants to maintain information on them. It will cost a fraction of the money used to construct and maintain these facilities.
Expensive?
Bill the DNC for all expenses incurred.
Anonymous wrote:This article outlines the Trump Administration plans for mass deportation. While in part relying on a “remain in Mexico” policy, it also requires the construction of an untold number of new detention facilities.
https://apple.news/Azc_QxwuoTymMEiX8wszEtA
First, this is going to take years to construct, and will line government contractors pockets with the overhead. Second, US citizens will be responsible for housing, food and transportation costs during the time period for adjudication. It seems like this set up is aimed to further privatize the deportation process at an enormous expense to American taxpayers.
Why is this more viable than having immigrants work while awaiting adjudication? Increase tracking capabilities and require employers of immigrants to maintain information on them. It will cost a fraction of the money used to construct and maintain these facilities.
Anonymous wrote:Trump got delayed illegally by a district court in Massachusetts telling him not to deport to a third country. Supreme Court sided with Trump. The judge looked at the dissent and claimed his original order stands. Supreme Court sided with Trump again, and said if judge ignored feel free to seek mandamus relief.
Then some of the people filed a claim in DC trying to get an injunction. That judge looked at what the Supreme Court did, and said he wanted no part of it, sent it to the judge in Massachusetts who has no authority. He dismissed the case.
I think those people are on the way to Sudan now.
Illegals, leave now to where you want, or you might end up in Sudan.