Anonymous wrote:Barr is trying to force Dana Boente out of the FBI

"Boente also said in a recently leaked memo that material put into the public record about Flynn was not exculpatory for the former national security advisor."

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/fbi-s-top-lawyer-dana-boente-ousted-amid-fox-news-n1219721

Well, this is reason enough....

"Boente signed one of the warrants renewing the FBI's authority to surveil Flynn. The warrants, known as FISA warrants, were renewed several times and had to be approved by a judge."

Anonymous wrote:Barr is trying to force Dana Boente out of the FBI

"Boente also said in a recently leaked memo that material put into the public record about Flynn was not exculpatory for the former national security advisor."

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/fbi-s-top-lawyer-dana-boente-ousted-amid-fox-news-n1219721

He also signed off on one of the Carter Page FISA warrants.

Barr is trying to force Dana Boente out of the FBI

"Boente also said in a recently leaked memo that material put into the public record about Flynn was not exculpatory for the former national security advisor."

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/fbi-s-top-lawyer-dana-boente-ousted-amid-fox-news-n1219721

No, he said he didn't want the Trump-Russia relationship to be boxed in by an escalating set of sanctions. Begs the question, what was planned for Trump-Russia? What I do know, Russia wanted the US out of Syria, and that has happened. What did the US get in exchange? Nothing.

And, pray tell, what did Obama do to help the Syrian people?

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2020/5/8/21251827/michael-flynn-russia-investigation-barr-trump-doj

“This is a pardon disguised as a technical legal matter.”



There is nothing in the released documents that support Flynn or the DOJ. It is pretty plain and straightfoward.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“Flynn has said he does not remember talking...with...Kislyak about sanctions...imposed by the Obama administration as punishment for Russia’s election meddling. But the transcripts showed that the sanctions were the central discussion point.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/29/us/politics/flynn-russian-ambassador-transcripts.html

The central discussion point was Middle East policy.

It's all connected.

Anonymous wrote:“Flynn has said he does not remember talking...with...Kislyak about sanctions...imposed by the Obama administration as punishment for Russia’s election meddling. But the transcripts showed that the sanctions were the central discussion point.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/29/us/politics/flynn-russian-ambassador-transcripts.html

The central discussion point was Middle East policy.

“Flynn has said he does not remember talking...with...Kislyak about sanctions...imposed by the Obama administration as punishment for Russia’s election meddling. But the transcripts showed that the sanctions were the central discussion point.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/29/us/politics/flynn-russian-ambassador-transcripts.html

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And, the FBI/Obama administration believed Flynn to be a Russian operative.

How absurd is this?

Or, maybe, just maybe, they wanted a way to monitor the Trump administration.....

Flynn sure sounds dumb enough to be a Russian fanboy. Those transcripts are embarrassing he's so obsequious to Kishlyak. You want that complete suck up as your National Security Advisor?

You are an idiot. And, that is being kind. It's called diplomacy. And, encouraging Russia not to escalate. I guess you think that is a bad thing.

Russia had just attacked our country and Flynn is literally BEGGING Russia to not retaliate for the sanctions. It's pitiful.

No, that's not what he said. He said he understood that they had to retaliate, but he asked them not to escalate so that it wouldn't get into a back and forth.

No, he said he didn't want the Trump-Russia relationship to be boxed in by an escalating set of sanctions. Begs the question, what was planned for Trump-Russia? What I do know, Russia wanted the US out of Syria, and that has happened. What did the US get in exchange? Nothing.

No, he said that he understood that Russia would have to take an action in response to the expulsions. He then asked for it to only be reciprocal. Nothing to do with the sanctions.

He literally used the term "boxed"

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kislyak brought up sanctions. Flynn pivoted to expulsions. Read it.

Exactly. That is hardly a "discussion" about sanctions.

Flynn brought up Russia's response to US actions regarding cyber when he asked for Russia's response to be reciprocal [rather than escalatory].

Flynn brought it up, not Kislyak.

It was not a "discussion" about the sanctions. It was about the expulsions, which were not part of the sanctions.

In that discussion, the word "sanctions" isn't used. Flynn talks about actions taken about cyber.

And in the very same sentence, he refers to the expulsions. Not sanctions.

Flynn was talkinig about actions taken about cyber. He muddled the sanctions with dismissing Russians out of the country, but he was the one who brought it up, not Kislyak.

In the question of, did Flynn bring up expulsions and sanctions? The answer is yes, Flynn brought them up.

How could he have forgotten that? He couldn't have.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And, the FBI/Obama administration believed Flynn to be a Russian operative.

How absurd is this?

Or, maybe, just maybe, they wanted a way to monitor the Trump administration.....

Flynn sure sounds dumb enough to be a Russian fanboy. Those transcripts are embarrassing he's so obsequious to Kishlyak. You want that complete suck up as your National Security Advisor?

You are an idiot. And, that is being kind. It's called diplomacy. And, encouraging Russia not to escalate. I guess you think that is a bad thing.

Russia had just attacked our country and Flynn is literally BEGGING Russia to not retaliate for the sanctions. It's pitiful.

No, that's not what he said. He said he understood that they had to retaliate, but he asked them not to escalate so that it wouldn't get into a back and forth.

No, he said he didn't want the Trump-Russia relationship to be boxed in by an escalating set of sanctions. Begs the question, what was planned for Trump-Russia? What I do know, Russia wanted the US out of Syria, and that has happened. What did the US get in exchange? Nothing.

We’re on the back foot in a million different places. Relationships with allies, destroyed, the Orange Traitor has pulled us out of a dozen treaties, he’s wrecked the country...

And these little Johnny Slowpokes on here boo hoo hoo because we can all see what traitors they are.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And, the FBI/Obama administration believed Flynn to be a Russian operative.

How absurd is this?

Or, maybe, just maybe, they wanted a way to monitor the Trump administration.....

Flynn sure sounds dumb enough to be a Russian fanboy. Those transcripts are embarrassing he's so obsequious to Kishlyak. You want that complete suck up as your National Security Advisor?

You are an idiot. And, that is being kind. It's called diplomacy. And, encouraging Russia not to escalate. I guess you think that is a bad thing.

Russia had just attacked our country and Flynn is literally BEGGING Russia to not retaliate for the sanctions. It's pitiful.

No, that's not what he said. He said he understood that they had to retaliate, but he asked them not to escalate so that it wouldn't get into a back and forth.

No, he said he didn't want the Trump-Russia relationship to be boxed in by an escalating set of sanctions. Begs the question, what was planned for Trump-Russia? What I do know, Russia wanted the US out of Syria, and that has happened. What did the US get in exchange? Nothing.

No, he said that he understood that Russia would have to take an action in response to the expulsions. He then asked for it to only be reciprocal. Nothing to do with the sanctions.

Anonymous wrote:The cons on this thread don’t disappoint with their willingness to ignore and excuse treachery.

Ain’t that the truth. I will never understand how these people can be so delusional.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kislyak brought up sanctions. Flynn pivoted to expulsions. Read it.

Exactly. That is hardly a "discussion" about sanctions.

Flynn brought up Russia's response to US actions regarding cyber when he asked for Russia's response to be reciprocal [rather than escalatory].

Flynn brought it up, not Kislyak.

It was not a "discussion" about the sanctions. It was about the expulsions, which were not part of the sanctions.

In that discussion, the word "sanctions" isn't used. Flynn talks about actions taken about cyber.

And in the very same sentence, he refers to the expulsions. Not sanctions.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And, the FBI/Obama administration believed Flynn to be a Russian operative.

How absurd is this?

Or, maybe, just maybe, they wanted a way to monitor the Trump administration.....

Flynn sure sounds dumb enough to be a Russian fanboy. Those transcripts are embarrassing he's so obsequious to Kishlyak. You want that complete suck up as your National Security Advisor?

You are an idiot. And, that is being kind. It's called diplomacy. And, encouraging Russia not to escalate. I guess you think that is a bad thing.

Russia had just attacked our country and Flynn is literally BEGGING Russia to not retaliate for the sanctions. It's pitiful.

No, that's not what he said. He said he understood that they had to retaliate, but he asked them not to escalate so that it wouldn't get into a back and forth.

No, he said he didn't want the Trump-Russia relationship to be boxed in by an escalating set of sanctions. Begs the question, what was planned for Trump-Russia? What I do know, Russia wanted the US out of Syria, and that has happened. What did the US get in exchange? Nothing.