Anonymous wrote:Factless Opinion? LOL!
Anonymous wrote:
Interesting that someone who claims to have "advanced degrees in Early Childhood education and years of REAL classroom experience" can't seem to come up with any coherent explanation with SPECIFICS of exactly why the standards are "bad" and "developmentally appropriate"
And interesting that someone who claims to be a copy editor can't seem to come up with any coherent explanation of their position either, other than just vague generalities of "bad" based on some nitpicky idiocy and their own intentional obtuseness....
Not to mention that either of them just come across as utterly clueless, whether speaking on standards, NCLB, testing, copy editing or education.
I am neither the copy editor not the early childhood educator. However, I can see that both of them have thought deeply about this issue. Their statements are not incoherent nor based on "nitpicky idiocy". A lot of what they are saying is resonating with me.
I am neither the copy editor not the early childhood educator. However, I can see that both of them have thought deeply about this issue. Their statements are not incoherent nor based on "nitpicky idiocy". A lot of what they are saying is resonating with me.
Interesting that someone who claims to have "advanced degrees in Early Childhood education and years of REAL classroom experience" can't seem to come up with any coherent explanation with SPECIFICS of exactly why the standards are "bad" and "developmentally appropriate"
And interesting that someone who claims to be a copy editor can't seem to come up with any coherent explanation of their position either, other than just vague generalities of "bad" based on some nitpicky idiocy and their own intentional obtuseness....
Not to mention that either of them just come across as utterly clueless, whether speaking on standards, NCLB, testing, copy editing or education.
Anonymous wrote:Interesting that someone who claims to have "advanced degrees in Early Childhood education and years of REAL classroom experience" can't seem to come up with any coherent explanation with SPECIFICS of exactly why the standards are "bad" and "developmentally appropriate"
And interesting that someone who claims to be a copy editor can't seem to come up with any coherent explanation of their position either, other than just vague generalities of "bad" based on some nitpicky idiocy and their own intentional obtuseness....
Not to mention that either of them just come across as utterly clueless, whether speaking on standards, NCLB, testing, copy editing or education.
Doubtful. I think I'm responding to maybe 2 posters tops who are responsible for 90% of the anti-CC posts. And both of which are full of shit.
Doubtful. I think I'm responding to maybe 2 posters tops who are responsible for 90% of the anti-CC posts. And both of which are full of shit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:LMAO! The PP keeps flipping between being an expert copy editor, then an expert on early childhood development, then an expert english teacher, then an expert math teacher, then an expert on standards, then an expert on professional organizations and so on... And then goes on to make some vague yet opinionated post about "it's bad, it's poorly written, it's developmentally inappropriate..." I just roll my eyes with every post.
Again, you are responding to many, many different posters, all with different specialities. I'm the copy editor as well as a parent who hates what the standards are doing to her kid.
Anonymous wrote:
Again, you are responding to many, many different posters, all with different specialities. I'm the copy editor as well as a parent who hates what the standards are doing to her kid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Because of the insistence, including at very young ages, to write a paragraph about every damn problem them solve.
Common Core is conscripted thinking. God forbid you should have an original thought -- Common Core punishes that.
Could you please cite one or two specific Common Core standards that call for the writing of a paragraph about every damn problem?
And actually, while you're looking at the Common Core standards, could you also please cite one or two specific Common Core standards that punish original thought? Unless, by "original thought", you mean something like thinking that 1+1=3. That would be an original thought, I guess.