Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Question for those who believe Karen Read is guilty: what if an eye witness came forward or a video was found that showed, without a doubt that John O’Keefe’s death was a slip and fall accident? So, no one would be to blame, it would just be a very sad accident.
How would you feel about this trial if it were proven that no one is to blame for John’s death? How would you feel about Karen Read and the idea that she had been unjustly accused? Would you feel understanding that she had to fight for innocence in court, or would you maybe find it hard to accept that she didn’t do it after thinking of her as guilty all this time?
Just curious if anybody who thinks she is guilty would feel bad if they learned that there was some incontrovertible proof that she had nothing to do with it.
If there were video, I would accept it immediately.
Since you asked, if there were video of KR hitting him, would you accept it?
Anonymous wrote:So now the jurors are saying that they weren’t 100% sure she was guilty, they were 99% sure but that didn’t cut it. If this is the way juries are moving to then I think we’re going to have a big problem in our criminal justice system.
Anonymous wrote:Question for those who believe Karen Read is guilty: what if an eye witness came forward or a video was found that showed, without a doubt that John O’Keefe’s death was a slip and fall accident? So, no one would be to blame, it would just be a very sad accident.
How would you feel about this trial if it were proven that no one is to blame for John’s death? How would you feel about Karen Read and the idea that she had been unjustly accused? Would you feel understanding that she had to fight for innocence in court, or would you maybe find it hard to accept that she didn’t do it after thinking of her as guilty all this time?
Just curious if anybody who thinks she is guilty would feel bad if they learned that there was some incontrovertible proof that she had nothing to do with it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So now the jurors are saying that they weren’t 100% sure she was guilty, they were 99% sure but that didn’t cut it. If this is the way juries are moving to then I think we’re going to have a big problem in our criminal justice system.
That isn’t what they’re saying. The jurors who have spoken out so far have said that some weren’t sure but there was enough reasonable doubt (particularly around the fact her taillight was illuminated in the tow truck and 5am videos) that it was a NG verdict. It was 100% consistent with the law and that you are presumed innocent until proven guilty. The CW did not prove guilt.
Anonymous wrote:So now the jurors are saying that they weren’t 100% sure she was guilty, they were 99% sure but that didn’t cut it. If this is the way juries are moving to then I think we’re going to have a big problem in our criminal justice system.
Anonymous wrote:Question for those who believe Karen Read is guilty: what if an eye witness came forward or a video was found that showed, without a doubt that John O’Keefe’s death was a slip and fall accident? So, no one would be to blame, it would just be a very sad accident.
How would you feel about this trial if it were proven that no one is to blame for John’s death? How would you feel about Karen Read and the idea that she had been unjustly accused? Would you feel understanding that she had to fight for innocence in court, or would you maybe find it hard to accept that she didn’t do it after thinking of her as guilty all this time?
Just curious if anybody who thinks she is guilty would feel bad if they learned that there was some incontrovertible proof that she had nothing to do with it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anyone who thinks cops randomly decided to take out a buddy and frame his drunk wife needs to delete their crime podcast apps. Listening to that crap every day has fried your brain.
+1
Karen Read = Casey Anthony = OJ Simpson.
Like it or not, all were found not guilty.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anyone who thinks cops randomly decided to take out a buddy and frame his drunk wife needs to delete their crime podcast apps. Listening to that crap every day has fried your brain.
+1
Karen Read = Casey Anthony = OJ Simpson.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But it happened. Higgins drove to the army base on the cape to dump his. He testified to this in the first trial.
Sure, he may have done this but pretending this was standard police procedure is a total lie, and indicates he was destroying his device for some reason other than just wanting to protect his sources or whatever he was claiming was on his phone legitimately.
Come on. There’s a tech person in every police dept that wipes devices or destroys them when they are obsolete. Police don’t individually decide how to handle information. It is regulated.
This PO dept was a total farce and anyone saying she was acquitted because of her lies and turtle boy blah blah is not facing reality.
I personally believe they had a fight in the house and dumped him outside or something along those lines, but I really don’t know.
What I do know, is that the police and that group were shady liars.
I never said it was standard police procedure.
Anonymous wrote:Anyone who thinks cops randomly decided to take out a buddy and frame his drunk wife needs to delete their crime podcast apps. Listening to that crap every day has fried your brain.
Anonymous wrote:Anyone who thinks cops randomly decided to take out a buddy and frame his drunk wife needs to delete their crime podcast apps. Listening to that crap every day has fried your brain.