Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You "kind of" get their point of view OP, really? They were completely disinherited, and you have no real information about why or how the marriage ended. That's not to say you should reject the inheritance, but yeah, be prepared for alegal battle. And perhaps internalize that this man did something deliberately and extremely hurtful to his own children, perhaps with your mother's support. It's one thing to have a distant relationship; another thing to completely disiniherit your children in favor of step-grandchildren, when there's apparently plenty of money to go around. It's kind of bad karma.
If the kids did not see him for the last 20 yers, you still think they deserve something? Why?
I doubt the truth of that narrative, and also the reasons behind if it's true. A complete disinheriting is meant to hurt your children as your dying act -- short of something really, really terrible, why would you do that? Not saying that this changes anything about the will, but yes, OP should be a tiny bit more empathetic.
I agree woth this person. As a dying act, it's a big F U to completely disown your bio kids. He got a divorce and permanently affected their lives. I wonder why the kids took the mother's side and cut off ties with him, and I wonder if he paid child support or what he tried to maintain contact with his kids. It's such a shame that he was petty enough not to even leave them anything out of the high six figures he gave to his wife's grandkids.
Anonymous wrote:I was raised by a single mom. She got married when I was in my late twenties and already married. My relationship with her husband was cordial but not close. However, our two teenage DCs spent a lot of time with my mom and her husband (they live a few states away). Her husband recently passed away. He had two adult children about my age, no grandchildren. I met one of them once and never met the other. He divorced their mother when the younger one finished high school. I never knew the story of the divorce, only heard snippets from my mom (who always acknowledged she only knew one side of the story) - that he was the sole provider pretty much the whole time, that his wife did not treat him well, that he stayed for the sake of the kids but that when he finally left the kids took their mother's side and basically wanted nothing to do with him after the divorce. All I can say is that for over 20 years he and my mom were together they were happy and he treated her very well.
Anyway, I have just found out that he left half his money to my mom and half of it in trust to my kids (high six figures each). We are not poor, but this would certainly give my kids a better start in life and more choices. I have been getting lots of angry calls and emails from his kids. I kind of get their point of view but I want to get them to get lost. Should I?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You "kind of" get their point of view OP, really? They were completely disinherited, and you have no real information about why or how the marriage ended. That's not to say you should reject the inheritance, but yeah, be prepared for alegal battle. And perhaps internalize that this man did something deliberately and extremely hurtful to his own children, perhaps with your mother's support. It's one thing to have a distant relationship; another thing to completely disiniherit your children in favor of step-grandchildren, when there's apparently plenty of money to go around. It's kind of bad karma.
If the kids did not see him for the last 20 yers, you still think they deserve something? Why?
I doubt the truth of that narrative, and also the reasons behind if it's true. A complete disinheriting is meant to hurt your children as your dying act -- short of something really, really terrible, why would you do that? Not saying that this changes anything about the will, but yes, OP should be a tiny bit more empathetic.
I agree woth this person. As a dying act, it's a big F U to completely disown your bio kids. He got a divorce and permanently affected their lives. I wonder why the kids took the mother's side and cut off ties with him, and I wonder if he paid child support or what he tried to maintain contact with his kids. It's such a shame that he was petty enough not to even leave them anything out of the high six figures he gave to his wife's grandkids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:However, our two teenage DCs spent a lot of time with my mom and her husband (they live a few states away).
How do two teens spend "a lot of time" with grandparents who live so far away?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You "kind of" get their point of view OP, really? They were completely disinherited, and you have no real information about why or how the marriage ended. That's not to say you should reject the inheritance, but yeah, be prepared for alegal battle. And perhaps internalize that this man did something deliberately and extremely hurtful to his own children, perhaps with your mother's support. It's one thing to have a distant relationship; another thing to completely disiniherit your children in favor of step-grandchildren, when there's apparently plenty of money to go around. It's kind of bad karma.
If the kids did not see him for the last 20 yers, you still think they deserve something? Why?
I doubt the truth of that narrative, and also the reasons behind if it's true. A complete disinheriting is meant to hurt your children as your dying act -- short of something really, really terrible, why would you do that? Not saying that this changes anything about the will, but yes, OP should be a tiny bit more empathetic.
Anonymous wrote:However, our two teenage DCs spent a lot of time with my mom and her husband (they live a few states away).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My sibling is listed by name in my mothers will as “Due to personal reasons Joe is receiving nothing from my estate”. They did a terrible horrible unforgivable thing and do not get to profit off of my mothers death.
Really curious as to what it was that Joe did.
Based on families I know, Joe could have done anything from converting to another religion to loving someone of the “wrong” race or gender. Or he just voted a way they disliked.
In my extended family, “Joe” was a drug addict who couldn’t keep a job, cheated on his wife, and finally abandoned his wife and child. So, yeah, the parents didn’t want this guy getting their money and spending it on drugs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My sibling is listed by name in my mothers will as “Due to personal reasons Joe is receiving nothing from my estate”. They did a terrible horrible unforgivable thing and do not get to profit off of my mothers death.
Really curious as to what it was that Joe did.
Based on families I know, Joe could have done anything from converting to another religion to loving someone of the “wrong” race or gender. Or he just voted a way they disliked.