Anonymous wrote:I moved my severely dyslexic DS to a private school after his public elementary school teacher mocked his writing in front of the class and would not post something he laboriously hand-wrote up on the wall with the work of the other students because it was too messy. He's a resilient kid -- he had to be -- but after years of hearing "you are lesser" from the public schools, that was the last straw.
The private school saw a brilliant child with a reading disability and acted accordingly. In contrast, the public school saw, and treated him as, a failure. Watching my previously beaten-down child soar has been emotionally wrenching, because I can see just how badly he was treated at the public school, and how many kids suffer just like him. He has turned into a confident reader and writer, and genuinely loves school. The private school has changed the course of his life. The entire experience has made me a supporter of income-limited vouchers, because other children should have the ability to escape, especially kids with SNs. It is heartbreaking and flat-out wrong how many kids suffer like my DS did, but who can't escape.
Caitlin Flanagan has a long history of being a shoddy and untrustworthy writer, but this article goes beyond her usual trolling drivel. I wonder if the Atlantic did any fact checking at all, maybe not because they seem to be more into truthiness rather than truth these days.
Anonymous wrote:I want my child to be a good, resilient, strong person. I would never send them to private school to be surrounded by those kids and families. I'm sure many of them are fine, but so very many of them have godawful values and behavior.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I want my child to be a good, resilient, strong person. I would never send them to private school to be surrounded by those kids and families. I'm sure many of them are fine, but so very many of them have godawful values and behavior.
Luckily for you this piece is largely a product of Flanagan's florid imagination.
Anonymous wrote:I want my child to be a good, resilient, strong person. I would never send them to private school to be surrounded by those kids and families. I'm sure many of them are fine, but so very many of them have godawful values and behavior.
Anonymous wrote:I think it’s human nature that when we see a problem, we want to find a villain who is responsible for it. But with bad schools, there’s a clear problem, but no one knows who the villain is or how to fix it, so that’s frustrating. Flanagan is just harnessing that human nature to suggest that private schools are the villains, even though that makes no sense.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I moved my severely dyslexic DS to a private school after his public elementary school teacher mocked his writing in front of the class and would not post something he laboriously hand-wrote up on the wall with the work of the other students because it was too messy. He's a resilient kid -- he had to be -- but after years of hearing "you are lesser" from the public schools, that was the last straw.
The private school saw a brilliant child with a reading disability and acted accordingly. In contrast, the public school saw, and treated him as, a failure. Watching my previously beaten-down child soar has been emotionally wrenching, because I can see just how badly he was treated at the public school, and how many kids suffer just like him. He has turned into a confident reader and writer, and genuinely loves school. The private school has changed the course of his life. The entire experience has made me a supporter of income-limited vouchers, because other children should have the ability to escape, especially kids with SNs. It is heartbreaking and flat-out wrong how many kids suffer like my DS did, but who can't escape.
Caitlin Flanagan has a long history of being a shoddy and untrustworthy writer, but this article goes beyond her usual trolling drivel. I wonder if the Atlantic did any fact checking at all, maybe not because they seem to be more into truthiness rather than truth these days.
That is awesome. I was on a ClubHouse talk about how to fix our education system last night and a point was made about how the one size fits all model created in industrial times doesn't work anymore. Kids need to go to schools that meet their needs and interests and strengths. Not everyone is the same type of learner so through different types of learning styles together and teaching with one learning style is a disaster.
Anonymous wrote:Public school teachers are paid much more than private school teachers. Some point to this as evidence that public school teachers are better. I think it’s evidence that the job of being a public school teacher is much more difficult.
The pay’s not bad though. In Baltimore $80k is a good salary.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Query: If you can afford to purchase a luxury car with all the bells and whistles, why shouldn’t you if you so choose, or should you allow society to shame you into purchasing a more modest vehicle? So if an elite private school offers a superior educational experience, and you can afford to send your child to one, why wouldn’t you? Why should society shame the parents who send their kids to such schools or the kids who attend? Perhaps society should a examine how the public schools have failed our kids and misspent all the public funds allocated toward public education.
The only problem is that the choice increasingly seems to be between the luxury car, and taking Metrobus. The latter is crowded, inconvenient, and sporadically doesn't show up. We don't need to shame the people with cars but we do need the bus to function much much better than it does. We need it to be safe, reliable, accessible, and even pleasant and enriching to ride. Unfortunately there are people who feel that if the bus is nice to ride, that makes their luxury car less special.
This is a great analogy. My kid was lucky enough to get a Mercedes for the price of a Yugo, but it still grieves me that it I couldn’t feel good about letting him take the bus.
For what it’s worth, after spending many years rubbing elbows with Mercedes owners, I honestly have yet to meet one who doesn’t support improving buses. I have literally never heard one express anything but good will and support towards the bus system.
Nah, I hear a lot of people who don't want to pay more in taxes, or who want vouchers and "school choice" because they don't want to pay for the public schools. I also get a lot of side eye because I'm still involved with the (small, starved) PTA at our old public school.
Good will and support needs to be backed by money and action.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you want to help, get the unions out of public schools.
You don't know what you are talking about.
Anonymous wrote:If you want to help, get the unions out of public schools.