Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At least some schools are finally taking action. Here is one (granted not in DC)
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/education/2020/01/13/nyc-doe-racist-segregation-brooklyn-specialized-high-school-exam-gifted/2763549001/
Wow, what a terrible move.
All that will result from this is that any family of means (including black or hispanic) who can go to private, will do so. So all you've done is punish poor students (predominantly poor asian immigrants) and weaken public schools.
Also, in that article there's a visual under the heading "Racial disparity in New York City’s kindergarten classes and its gifted and talented programs" which purposefully puts White at the top even though Asian should be at the top. Unconscious bias, anyone?
Yeah, or they will leave the city entirely. Especially with crime going up. Good parents will just take their kids into the suburbs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tutoring is good, but its impact will be lower than you think.
Mainly the kids with motivated parents will want to stay for extra tutoring/school. These are the kids that are likely to succeed anyway.
The kids that have the most trouble come from households that don’t have the time, energy, or inclination to care about school.
They won’t make their kids sign up for tutoring.
Some say the problem starts even earlier, with parents not reading or talking enough to their toddlers or even worse neglecting or abusing them.
It sets kids behind even in kindergarten.
I’d say universal pre-K is more helpful than tutoring, but even that’s not a silver bullet.
We really just need to fix poverty. There’s a strong correlation between family income and educational success.
This. Move to Russia if you want socialism.
Your don’t “fix” poverty- that’s cAlled socialism. USA is capitalist last I checked.
You won't ever get rid of poverty, but you can reduce it. Capitalist societies are capable of that last I checked.
Again, there is a strong correlation between family income and educational success. We should be working toward reducing poverty and that in turn will boost educational outcomes.
Some people say 2/3s of learning occurs at home. There's only so much that you can do through schools.
There is a CORRELATION between income and educational success. That does not imply causation. You can't give poor people money and expect their kids to suddenly start doing well in school. It doesn't work that way. My family was economically stable because of my dad's work ethic, and he instilled that trait in all of his children, which is why we were successful in education. You cannot make people succeed in school without motivation. And motivation comes from learning that hard work pays off. Giving people handouts teaches precisely the opposite. "Son, you don't need to work hard in school, because the government will take care of you."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tutoring is good, but its impact will be lower than you think.
Mainly the kids with motivated parents will want to stay for extra tutoring/school. These are the kids that are likely to succeed anyway.
The kids that have the most trouble come from households that don’t have the time, energy, or inclination to care about school.
They won’t make their kids sign up for tutoring.
Some say the problem starts even earlier, with parents not reading or talking enough to their toddlers or even worse neglecting or abusing them.
It sets kids behind even in kindergarten.
I’d say universal pre-K is more helpful than tutoring, but even that’s not a silver bullet.
We really just need to fix poverty. There’s a strong correlation between family income and educational success.
This. Move to Russia if you want socialism.
Your don’t “fix” poverty- that’s cAlled socialism. USA is capitalist last I checked.
You won't ever get rid of poverty, but you can reduce it. Capitalist societies are capable of that last I checked.
Again, there is a strong correlation between family income and educational success. We should be working toward reducing poverty and that in turn will boost educational outcomes.
Some people say 2/3s of learning occurs at home. There's only so much that you can do through schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At least some schools are finally taking action. Here is one (granted not in DC)
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/education/2020/01/13/nyc-doe-racist-segregation-brooklyn-specialized-high-school-exam-gifted/2763549001/
Wow, what a terrible move.
All that will result from this is that any family of means (including black or hispanic) who can go to private, will do so. So all you've done is punish poor students (predominantly poor asian immigrants) and weaken public schools.
Also, in that article there's a visual under the heading "Racial disparity in New York City’s kindergarten classes and its gifted and talented programs" which purposefully puts White at the top even though Asian should be at the top. Unconscious bias, anyone?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At least some schools are finally taking action. Here is one (granted not in DC)
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/education/2020/01/13/nyc-doe-racist-segregation-brooklyn-specialized-high-school-exam-gifted/2763549001/
Wow, what a terrible move.
All that will result from this is that any family of means (including black or hispanic) who can go to private, will do so. So all you've done is punish poor students (predominantly poor asian immigrants) and weaken public schools.
Also, in that article there's a visual under the heading "Racial disparity in New York City’s kindergarten classes and its gifted and talented programs" which purposefully puts White at the top even though Asian should be at the top. Unconscious bias, anyone?
Anonymous wrote:At least some schools are finally taking action. Here is one (granted not in DC)
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/education/2020/01/13/nyc-doe-racist-segregation-brooklyn-specialized-high-school-exam-gifted/2763549001/
Anonymous wrote:America is the land of opportunity, not of results. If parents aren't taking advantage of 12+ years of free education, their child's educational results will be in their hands. Getting your child to school every day isn't going to be enough for success, nor should it be. Too many parents expect schools to do it all. If you haven't taught your child manners at home, why do you think the school can do it? If you don't make your child do their homework, that's on you. If you don't communicate with teachers, that's also on you.
Anonymous wrote:As I tell my kids:
Study hard, stay out of trouble, finish school, get a job... so you can pay for all the people who don’t.
Anonymous wrote:As I tell my kids:
Study hard, stay out of trouble, finish school, get a job... so you can pay for all the people who don’t.
Anonymous wrote:I have mixed ancestry, but identify as AA. I’m also a mid-career public school teacher and have taught in a diverse variety of schools. I taught AP for three years and two of my own children have taken AP courses. Here’s my thoughts:
1) who gets selected to take AP and who gets support during the course can be shaped by systemic racism. My district had a huge problem with excluding students of color from these courses when selection was based on teacher recommendation. Once students were allowed to chose, the enrollment increased a lot temporarily. When they dropped a bit, surveys found that students of color withdrew because they felt unwelcome by the teachers and white peers. Not because the work was difficult or boring. Because they were asked if they were in the wrong classroom or not called upon unless the question was about race. When my older DD took AP, she was not invited to the elective support course that most of the white students were enrolled in. When she asked about it, the teacher told her that it was for students who needed to get a 5 to apply for highly competitive colleges and she could get into a state school or HBCU just fine with a 3. Of course, we had a meeting about that and the teacher said she meant no harm, it was just based on her experience with students like my daughter. She failed to clarify what she meant other than DD’s skin color. DD transfered to the other AP teacher and ended up earning a 5.
2) The tests themselves do not seem racially biased or class-biased in the way that the SAT can be.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tutoring is good, but its impact will be lower than you think.
Mainly the kids with motivated parents will want to stay for extra tutoring/school. These are the kids that are likely to succeed anyway.
The kids that have the most trouble come from households that don’t have the time, energy, or inclination to care about school.
They won’t make their kids sign up for tutoring.
Some say the problem starts even earlier, with parents not reading or talking enough to their toddlers or even worse neglecting or abusing them.
It sets kids behind even in kindergarten.
I’d say universal pre-K is more helpful than tutoring, but even that’s not a silver bullet.
We really just need to fix poverty. There’s a strong correlation between family income and educational success.
This. Move to Russia if you want socialism.
Your don’t “fix” poverty- that’s cAlled socialism. USA is capitalist last I checked.