Anonymous wrote:Why assuming no issues? My teen has severe ADHD and associated learning disabilities. His schooling is decent, but not impressive, and left to himself, he'd be playing video games all day, because ADHD and addictive personalities go hand in hand. He needs A LOT of supervision, and will need a lot of supervision in college as well. Despite what idiots say on DCUM about letting their kids fail at a certain age, my son is part of a population that needs an extra decade in order to be a responsible, productive, adult. I know, because my husband and myself were like this too, and we are grateful our parents steered us in the right direction for longer than average.
You might want to double check whether yours has ADHD.
Anonymous wrote:
And many never do, especially on this sort of path.
If you go to any college dorm in America, you will find young men playing video games and watching sports. This is not a "path to destruction" - it's part of the culture. OP didn't say that her kid is in a gang, selling drugs, a truant, etc. He's not ruined forever because he isn't competitive at his sport at a national level or the president of all the clubs.
Anonymous wrote:
And many never do, especially on this sort of path.
If you go to any college dorm in America, you will find young men playing video games and watching sports. This is not a "path to destruction" - it's part of the culture. OP didn't say that her kid is in a gang, selling drugs, a truant, etc. He's not ruined forever because he isn't competitive at his sport at a national level or the president of all the clubs.
And many never do, especially on this sort of path.
Anonymous wrote:Failing out of school is next to impossible. You have to literally stop going. MCPS has a 90% graduation rate, for example.
And literally 50% of all 12th graders have an A average GPA, so people should stop acting like Bs and Cs or even As and Bs or is demonstrative of much of anything. Any parent who rides a below average teen can get them to eke out As and Bs quite easily. It's meaningless.
Anonymous wrote:I’ve only read the OP so far. Not all kids are competitive at sports. If he loves his “no cut” sport and enjoys it, who the F cares whether he practices or excels. I imagine it gets his body moving, and it enables him to interact with other people. It sounds like you want him to reflect well on you, or match your competitive, driven spirit, and that’s not a fair burden to put on him. Kids bloom and evolve at different times, some later than others. He will find his own path.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe he’s just average? That’s OK, you know. Is he happy? Does he have friends?
+1. My teen DS plays more videogames than I'd like but I've learned that it's how he and his friends like to socialize. He's not at all competitive, doesn't like to join school teams/ clubs, but does well in class and, most importantly, he's kind and has good friends. He won't go to a college that DCUM finds impressive but I'm confident he'll find his way in life and be happy.
On DCUM a child is “average” because they “only” got a 1300 on the SAT or got a couple more Bs than As or only made district titles rather than state!
Grades are no longer a measure of success. ACT/SAT scores and college readiness rates are sliding, yet 50% of all 12th graders in the US have an A average GPA. Teens are several grade levels behind while maintaining As and Bs.
Do not look at your painfully unmotivated lazy child and pretend everything is ok because they have decent grades — EVERYONE has decent grades now. Nearly half the kids who begin college fail or drop out because they’re so many grade levels behind and have no discipline and no study skills.
NO EVERYONE does not have decent grades. I hate that DCUM perpetuates this lie. Plenty of kids in MCPS still struggle, and are "unimpressive". It's a very tough area to be average.
In 2019 my niece graduated from a half-decent public school district with a 3.33 GPA. Her parents bragged she was an As and Bs student who never had to study. She then decided to take classes at the local two-year community college, which required placement tests. She tested into remedial courses that were on par with 7th grade level material.
Grades are meaningless – especially non-honors and non-AP courses. And really, AP grades mean nothing if the kid can't earn at least a 3 on the AP Exam. Many kids take AP courses, get inflated grades, then totally skip or bomb the exams.
Oh shit.![]()
That must have been a shock to them! I can't even imagine how humiliating that would be to find out. Damn.
It's easy to predict without placement tests. If your 11th grader scores in the teens to sub 23 on the ACT (or equivalent on the SAT), they have the acuity of a 6th to 10th grader. But most non-tiger parents have no idea what an ACT/SAT score actually means and just ignore if since inflated grades appear good.
I know plenty of people who got 20-22 on the ACT and are elementary teachers, in communications, etc. Breathe!
Good for you? The college graduation rate of teens with sub 22 or 23 on the ACT is only about 25%.
Graduation rate for 23 is 60%..
http://www.act.org/content/dam/act/unsecured/documents/Info-Brief-2012-30.pdf
Also, income level is a greater prediction of dropping out... and if you look at who drops out it's #1... money, #2... mental health... not ACT score.
I would ask yourself what he was like when he was very young. If he used to be super engaged and the sort of kid who always asked interesting questions, was busy "doing", thought deeply and wanted to "know more" than I would be very concerned. If he always seemed like a very "average" laidback, non competitive, not that curious person then maybe that's the way he is? Has he ever been tested for IQ, etc? Not saying you should if he hasn't but maybe he is just an average kid with no real strong interest in things beyond consuming what others do. I don't mean this rudely. My SIL is like this and I think always has been, based on my husbands memory, although she got decent grades and is a very nice person she was never the "star" at anything, she doesn't have that many interests beyond hanging out with friends and her family(her job is one that is not that intellectually stimulating but pays the bills), she has no "calling" or strong desire to create anything. She doesn't even like to cook. She is who she is and she found a husband who likes to "do" while she watches. They seem suited for each other.
I'm not like that and for years I thought she was very lame, frankly. But I've matured over time and come to "each their own" and BTW she seems happy enough. I've known her for over 20 years. Since she was 19.
I should add that her parents never put any pressure on her to "succeed". Neither did mine, but I have a number of innate "talents" and would feel profoundly unhappy if I never did anything creative and lived a life like my SIL. My husband also has an innate drive to do things and has been very successful in an entirely different field than I am.
Anonymous wrote:I would ask yourself what he was like when he was very young. If he used to be super engaged and the sort of kid who always asked interesting questions, was busy "doing", thought deeply and wanted to "know more" than I would be very concerned. If he always seemed like a very "average" laidback, non competitive, not that curious person then maybe that's the way he is? Has he ever been tested for IQ, etc? Not saying you should if he hasn't but maybe he is just an average kid with no real strong interest in things beyond consuming what others do. I don't mean this rudely. My SIL is like this and I think always has been, based on my husbands memory, although she got decent grades and is a very nice person she was never the "star" at anything, she doesn't have that many interests beyond hanging out with friends and her family(her job is one that is not that intellectually stimulating but pays the bills), she has no "calling" or strong desire to create anything. She doesn't even like to cook. She is who she is and she found a husband who likes to "do" while she watches. They seem suited for each other.
I'm not like that and for years I thought she was very lame, frankly. But I've matured over time and come to "each their own" and BTW she seems happy enough. I've known her for over 20 years. Since she was 19.
I should add that her parents never put any pressure on her to "succeed". Neither did mine, but I have a number of innate "talents" and would feel profoundly unhappy if I never did anything creative and lived a life like my SIL. My husband also has an innate drive to do things and has been very successful in an entirely different field than I am.
This is a long way of saying that maybe after making sure nothing is going on physically with him,(important! especially is this is new behavior over the past couple years) you could just accept the possibility that he is an average person like most people out there and will just work in an office with a job someday that pays the bills, nothing "impressive", hopefully finds a partner who loves him and he loves back, and you can enjoy his company as a family doing things for fun you all in enjoy as life goes on? If he is just average you should just focus on having a loving relationship with him and accept him as he is. Who knows maybe he will surprise you later in life? Especially if he feels not judged now -- he may be less afraid to put himself out there later in life if the impulse strikes him!