Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:of course without mentioning any specifics it should go without saying that the race, ethnicity are not mentioned but with those stats members of certain groups would have a better chance than others. Don't get angry with me - that's just the way it is.
yes, rich white athletes, legacies and donors all would have a substantially better chance of getting in with those stats. thank you for raising the point.
well, OP's DD didn't play any sports (at least OP doesn't mention it), so her kid is not a "rich white athlete," so that factor isn't in play here one way or the other. OTH, legacy or donor could be, but unlikely. Race, however, everyone has one.
Would OP’s daughter get in if she were URM?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:of course without mentioning any specifics it should go without saying that the race, ethnicity are not mentioned but with those stats members of certain groups would have a better chance than others. Don't get angry with me - that's just the way it is.
yes, rich white athletes, legacies and donors all would have a substantially better chance of getting in with those stats. thank you for raising the point.
well, OP's DD didn't play any sports (at least OP doesn't mention it), so her kid is not a "rich white athlete," so that factor isn't in play here one way or the other. OTH, legacy or donor could be, but unlikely. Race, however, everyone has one.
Would OP’s daughter get in if she were URM?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The general consensus seems to be that the OP applicant has a decent chance of getting into HYP but, because there are so many other applicants with more or less the same credentials, as well as other strong applicants with different credentials/qualities/backgrounds, there is a greater chance that the OP applicant will not get into HYP.
That may be depressing, but there's also a silver lining. Four years from now, most highly selective employers, professional schools and graduate programs will look far beyond HYP. If you look at Harvard Law, to take one example, you'll see that the majority of applicants from HYP are rejected. HYP are more heavily represented at Harvard Law than other colleges, but the majority of the Harvard Law class comes from colleges other than HYP. The same phenomenon occurs with just about every highly selective post-college opportunity, from management consulting to grad school to medical school. So if you're really smart and don't get into HYP when you're a high school senior, don't worry that much, since nothing will hold you back. Whether you end up at a less selective Ivy, a state university, or a less selective liberal arts college, you'll still have plenty of chances to succeed. And the people who got into HYP over you may not end up any better off than they would have if you had been able to switch places with them.
Harvard knows Harvard ain’t all that. That’s why Harvard doesn’t choose its own grads. It used to mean something but its “holistic” admissions has watered down it’s brand.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:P.P.. I agree. This poster sounds sadly crazy to rejoice over someone else's failures.
It’s not only crazy, it’s cruel to call someone who worked hard a robot full of ambition without heart and run of the mill. Who are you to judge whether someone has heart? Plenty of smart people change course in their 20s, that doesn’t mean they don’t have heart or they’re run of the mill.
Oh yes, at her age, she’s still paying for her college and medical school loans.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:of course without mentioning any specifics it should go without saying that the race, ethnicity are not mentioned but with those stats members of certain groups would have a better chance than others. Don't get angry with me - that's just the way it is.
yes, rich white athletes, legacies and donors all would have a substantially better chance of getting in with those stats. thank you for raising the point.
well, OP's DD didn't play any sports (at least OP doesn't mention it), so her kid is not a "rich white athlete," so that factor isn't in play here one way or the other. OTH, legacy or donor could be, but unlikely. Race, however, everyone has one.
Would OP’s daughter get in if she were URM?
Probably
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Okay, so why is that % decrease so prevalent w/elites? Common App? Large #s of internationals applying? USNWR rankings game?
More applicants.
exactly. Nobody applied to 17- 20 schools when we were in school, now it's commonplace
Also, HYP is also need blind for international students which has driven applications up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The general consensus seems to be that the OP applicant has a decent chance of getting into HYP but, because there are so many other applicants with more or less the same credentials, as well as other strong applicants with different credentials/qualities/backgrounds, there is a greater chance that the OP applicant will not get into HYP.
That may be depressing, but there's also a silver lining. Four years from now, most highly selective employers, professional schools and graduate programs will look far beyond HYP. If you look at Harvard Law, to take one example, you'll see that the majority of applicants from HYP are rejected. HYP are more heavily represented at Harvard Law than other colleges, but the majority of the Harvard Law class comes from colleges other than HYP. The same phenomenon occurs with just about every highly selective post-college opportunity, from management consulting to grad school to medical school. So if you're really smart and don't get into HYP when you're a high school senior, don't worry that much, since nothing will hold you back. Whether you end up at a less selective Ivy, a state university, or a less selective liberal arts college, you'll still have plenty of chances to succeed. And the people who got into HYP over you may not end up any better off than they would have if you had been able to switch places with them.
Harvard knows Harvard ain’t all that. That’s why Harvard doesn’t choose its own grads. It used to mean something but its “holistic” admissions has watered down it’s brand.
Anonymous wrote:The general consensus seems to be that the OP applicant has a decent chance of getting into HYP but, because there are so many other applicants with more or less the same credentials, as well as other strong applicants with different credentials/qualities/backgrounds, there is a greater chance that the OP applicant will not get into HYP.
That may be depressing, but there's also a silver lining. Four years from now, most highly selective employers, professional schools and graduate programs will look far beyond HYP. If you look at Harvard Law, to take one example, you'll see that the majority of applicants from HYP are rejected. HYP are more heavily represented at Harvard Law than other colleges, but the majority of the Harvard Law class comes from colleges other than HYP. The same phenomenon occurs with just about every highly selective post-college opportunity, from management consulting to grad school to medical school. So if you're really smart and don't get into HYP when you're a high school senior, don't worry that much, since nothing will hold you back. Whether you end up at a less selective Ivy, a state university, or a less selective liberal arts college, you'll still have plenty of chances to succeed. And the people who got into HYP over you may not end up any better off than they would have if you had been able to switch places with them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:of course without mentioning any specifics it should go without saying that the race, ethnicity are not mentioned but with those stats members of certain groups would have a better chance than others. Don't get angry with me - that's just the way it is.
yes, rich white athletes, legacies and donors all would have a substantially better chance of getting in with those stats. thank you for raising the point.
well, OP's DD didn't play any sports (at least OP doesn't mention it), so her kid is not a "rich white athlete," so that factor isn't in play here one way or the other. OTH, legacy or donor could be, but unlikely. Race, however, everyone has one.
Would OP’s daughter get in if she were URM?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:of course without mentioning any specifics it should go without saying that the race, ethnicity are not mentioned but with those stats members of certain groups would have a better chance than others. Don't get angry with me - that's just the way it is.
yes, rich white athletes, legacies and donors all would have a substantially better chance of getting in with those stats. thank you for raising the point.
well, OP's DD didn't play any sports (at least OP doesn't mention it), so her kid is not a "rich white athlete," so that factor isn't in play here one way or the other. OTH, legacy or donor could be, but unlikely. Race, however, everyone has one.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Okay, so why is that % decrease so prevalent w/elites? Common App? Large #s of internationals applying? USNWR rankings game?
More applicants.
exactly. Nobody applied to 17- 20 schools when we were in school, now it's commonplace
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Okay, so why is that % decrease so prevalent w/elites? Common App? Large #s of internationals applying? USNWR rankings game?
More applicants.
exactly. Nobody applied to 17- 20 schools when we were in school, now it's commonplace