Anonymous wrote:Subjective assessments and letter should not be apart of admissions:
1. what if teachers/interviewers are racist? and
2. Who is going to write a bad letter of recommendation. These are worthless.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you want it to be fair use a standardized tests that is more readily available, have every kid take it, have a cut off where you view anyone above the threshold as qualified and use a lottery of every kid who meets the standard to determine spots
THIS
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:From another thread but more relevant to this one:
Dig even a little further into Curie's Facebook page and you'll find photos of a similar list from 2019 - the class of 2023. This list has 95 students admitted to TJ, and would have been the second year of the Quant-Q.
https://www.facebook.com/curielearningllc/photos/a...6414351848218/1216596798496640
And here is the list from 2018 - which would have been the first year of the Quant-Q. Only 51 successful TJ applicants!
https://www.facebook.com/curielearningllc/photos/a...5923525897303/975988479224141/
From 51 to 95 to 133 in the first three years of the Quant-Q. The most charitable explanation is that the organization has gained a reputation and has grown because of good word of mouth. A darker explanation is that they're handing kids an exam that is supposed to be secure - which is what TJ kids are telling us that they're doing.
You decide.
I can't view facebook. Can someone screenshot the posts?
Anonymous wrote:From another thread but more relevant to this one:
Dig even a little further into Curie's Facebook page and you'll find photos of a similar list from 2019 - the class of 2023. This list has 95 students admitted to TJ, and would have been the second year of the Quant-Q.
https://www.facebook.com/curielearningllc/photos/a...6414351848218/1216596798496640
And here is the list from 2018 - which would have been the first year of the Quant-Q. Only 51 successful TJ applicants!
https://www.facebook.com/curielearningllc/photos/a...5923525897303/975988479224141/
From 51 to 95 to 133 in the first three years of the Quant-Q. The most charitable explanation is that the organization has gained a reputation and has grown because of good word of mouth. A darker explanation is that they're handing kids an exam that is supposed to be secure - which is what TJ kids are telling us that they're doing.
You decide.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Or..... and hear me out.... what if there were no exam? What if we used....
- more robust teacher recommendations that were designed to identify top performers in each class/school, not only on metrics of academic performance, but also improving the recommendations to include areas like grit, determination, response to adversity, concern for others, academic citizenship, integrity, etc?
- SIS questions that give a stronger overall profile of each student and allow an admissions committee to create a balanced class - Do you even want to go to TJ? How would you impact an academic community? What do you want to be when you grow up? What sort of things do you enjoy outside of STEM?
- GPA and SOL scores to establish a baseline of competency in the relevant courses, with no favoritism towards kids who are in Geometry or higher in 8th grade?
- an interview process designed to help determine which kids are genuine in their interest and aptitude for a comprehensive advanced education with a focus on STEM?
A class of students selected in this way would have a MUCH, MUCH higher ceiling than the current classes that walk around TJ right now.
Ugh. That would make things incredibly subjective. It would still lead to gaming of the system, since kids would simply learn how to write the SIS questions and perform at the interviews in a way that helps them look good to the selection committees.
A well-trained selection committee can ferret these things out pretty easily. People who volunteer to conduct interviews for elite universities are trained to do this all the time.
And besides, as long as there is no publicized criteria for what the committees are looking for, and as long as the class that you end up with is sufficiently diverse in terms of perspectives and interests, it will be extremely hard to prepare a student for any of these things.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Or..... and hear me out.... what if there were no exam? What if we used....
- more robust teacher recommendations that were designed to identify top performers in each class/school, not only on metrics of academic performance, but also improving the recommendations to include areas like grit, determination, response to adversity, concern for others, academic citizenship, integrity, etc?
- SIS questions that give a stronger overall profile of each student and allow an admissions committee to create a balanced class - Do you even want to go to TJ? How would you impact an academic community? What do you want to be when you grow up? What sort of things do you enjoy outside of STEM?
- GPA and SOL scores to establish a baseline of competency in the relevant courses, with no favoritism towards kids who are in Geometry or higher in 8th grade?
- an interview process designed to help determine which kids are genuine in their interest and aptitude for a comprehensive advanced education with a focus on STEM?
A class of students selected in this way would have a MUCH, MUCH higher ceiling than the current classes that walk around TJ right now.
Ugh. That would make things incredibly subjective. It would still lead to gaming of the system, since kids would simply learn how to write the SIS questions and perform at the interviews in a way that helps them look good to the selection committees.
Anonymous wrote:If you want it to be fair use a standardized tests that is more readily available, have every kid take it, have a cut off where you view anyone above the threshold as qualified and use a lottery of every kid who meets the standard to determine spots
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Or..... and hear me out.... what if there were no exam? What if we used....
- more robust teacher recommendations that were designed to identify top performers in each class/school, not only on metrics of academic performance, but also improving the recommendations to include areas like grit, determination, response to adversity, concern for others, academic citizenship, integrity, etc?
- SIS questions that give a stronger overall profile of each student and allow an admissions committee to create a balanced class - Do you even want to go to TJ? How would you impact an academic community? What do you want to be when you grow up? What sort of things do you enjoy outside of STEM?
- GPA and SOL scores to establish a baseline of competency in the relevant courses, with no favoritism towards kids who are in Geometry or higher in 8th grade?
- an interview process designed to help determine which kids are genuine in their interest and aptitude for a comprehensive advanced education with a focus on STEM?
A class of students selected in this way would have a MUCH, MUCH higher ceiling than the current classes that walk around TJ right now.
Asking teachers about personal qualities is discriminatory against disabled kids with autism spectrum, etc. There are certainly many math geniuses with questionable social skills. This is the kind of kid that a program like this is designed for.
Anonymous wrote:Or..... and hear me out.... what if there were no exam? What if we used....
- more robust teacher recommendations that were designed to identify top performers in each class/school, not only on metrics of academic performance, but also improving the recommendations to include areas like grit, determination, response to adversity, concern for others, academic citizenship, integrity, etc?
- SIS questions that give a stronger overall profile of each student and allow an admissions committee to create a balanced class - Do you even want to go to TJ? How would you impact an academic community? What do you want to be when you grow up? What sort of things do you enjoy outside of STEM?
- GPA and SOL scores to establish a baseline of competency in the relevant courses, with no favoritism towards kids who are in Geometry or higher in 8th grade?
- an interview process designed to help determine which kids are genuine in their interest and aptitude for a comprehensive advanced education with a focus on STEM?
A class of students selected in this way would have a MUCH, MUCH higher ceiling than the current classes that walk around TJ right now.
Anonymous wrote:Or..... and hear me out.... what if there were no exam? What if we used....
- more robust teacher recommendations that were designed to identify top performers in each class/school, not only on metrics of academic performance, but also improving the recommendations to include areas like grit, determination, response to adversity, concern for others, academic citizenship, integrity, etc?
- SIS questions that give a stronger overall profile of each student and allow an admissions committee to create a balanced class - Do you even want to go to TJ? How would you impact an academic community? What do you want to be when you grow up? What sort of things do you enjoy outside of STEM?
- GPA and SOL scores to establish a baseline of competency in the relevant courses, with no favoritism towards kids who are in Geometry or higher in 8th grade?
- an interview process designed to help determine which kids are genuine in their interest and aptitude for a comprehensive advanced education with a focus on STEM?
A class of students selected in this way would have a MUCH, MUCH higher ceiling than the current classes that walk around TJ right now.