Anonymous wrote:These men have a right to a fair trial. Innocent until proven guilty.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Aren't there pictures that show the older inbred is a member of the Klan?
https://www.gafollowers.com/gregory-mcmichael-murderer-ahmaud-arbery-seen-at-kkk-rally-in-2016/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:None of this matters.
Why, because those two stupid idiots with guns killed a man who did not have a gun.
They are not police officers.
They killed someone period, who was not in anyway threatening their lives to the point they had to shoot.
There is zero defense here. Doesn't matter the character of the guy shot, he didn't have a gun. He wasn't attacking them.
Anyone defending them is sick....
It matters for two reasons, although I am not defending them. I think they should get a fair trial, and, if appropriate, a fair hanging. As a practical matter, I don’t think there is much if any chance that these guys won’t be convicted of some flavor of criminal homicide, as IMO they should be based on what I know about the case so far. It will significantly affect the case though—it basically takes first degree murder off the table, since I don’t think a procsecutor will be able to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that it was premeditated. The defense will be able to plausibly argue it was just a citizens arrest gone bad. That also puts negligent homicide on the table, although I doubt they get off that easy. But there is now a real chance of a disposition like voluntary manslaughter, and that’s really going to piss a lot of people off. We’ll see, a lot depends on the details of state law.
Second, a lot of the discussion is around the larger social meaning of this case, and IMO it’s totally different if you have a couple of yahoos intentionally killing for sport vs. stupidly confronting a burglar in a way that recklessly caused his death.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:None of this matters.
Why, because those two stupid idiots with guns killed a man who did not have a gun.
They are not police officers.
They killed someone period, who was not in anyway threatening their lives to the point they had to shoot.
There is zero defense here. Doesn't matter the character of the guy shot, he didn't have a gun. He wasn't attacking them.
Anyone defending them is sick....
It matters for two reasons, although I am not defending them. I think they should get a fair trial, and, if appropriate, a fair hanging. As a practical matter, I don’t think there is much if any chance that these guys won’t be convicted of some flavor of criminal homicide, as IMO they should be based on what I know about the case so far. It will significantly affect the case though—it basically takes first degree murder off the table, since I don’t think a procsecutor will be able to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that it was premeditated. The defense will be able to plausibly argue it was just a citizens arrest gone bad. That also puts negligent homicide on the table, although I doubt they get off that easy. But there is now a real chance of a disposition like voluntary manslaughter, and that’s really going to piss a lot of people off. We’ll see, a lot depends on the details of state law.
Second, a lot of the discussion is around the larger social meaning of this case, and IMO it’s totally different if you have a couple of yahoos intentionally killing for sport vs. stupidly confronting a burglar in a way that recklessly caused his death.
Anonymous wrote:Aren't there pictures that show the older inbred is a member of the Klan?
Anonymous wrote:None of this matters.
Why, because those two stupid idiots with guns killed a man who did not have a gun.
They are not police officers.
They killed someone period, who was not in anyway threatening their lives to the point they had to shoot.
There is zero defense here. Doesn't matter the character of the guy shot, he didn't have a gun. He wasn't attacking them.
Anyone defending them is sick....
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The idiot who released the tape thought it would cheat his friends. That goes to show how deeply ingrained that racism is. If dude had just complied, they would not have shit him.
Sick, just sick.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8302641/Attorney-leaked-Ahmaud-Arbery-lynching-video-thought-CLEAR-friends.html
Holy crap.
“Attorney Alan Tucker told Inside Edition Friday that he was responsible for releasing the footage, which showed his pals Gregory and Travis McMichael engaged in a fatal altercation with Arbery in Brunswick on February 23.
'I really thought releasing the video would put the truth out to the public,' Tucker stated.
'If he [Arbery] had just froze and hadn't done anything, then he wouldn't have been shot.'”
Any former client of this guy should file an immediately file an appeal based on ineffective counsel.
Anonymous wrote:The idiot who released the tape thought it would cheat his friends. That goes to show how deeply ingrained that racism is. If dude had just complied, they would not have shit him.
Sick, just sick.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8302641/Attorney-leaked-Ahmaud-Arbery-lynching-video-thought-CLEAR-friends.html