Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No, I'm suggesting that students that may get into both Princeton and Harvard may, despite Princeton having a better undergraduate education, choose Harvard in part due to having proximity to MIT and the wider Boston area.
The idea of location preference is not a crazy one.
Let's help you out again; per the OP "Did not apply to Harvard, Yale, Brown or Dartmouth. Waitlisted at UPenn."
Let's help you out again: The argument is regarding isolated suburban colleges and non-isolated urban colleges. Do I need to connect the dots for you or are you a big enough girl to get it now?
Such a shame you can't articulate your argument either clearly or consistently. You aren't helping yourself, much less the OP.
My position has been rather clear and consistent, however at some point the conversation needs to be at a high-school level, not a kindergarten one as you might prefer.
Do you enjoy being a kid?
Who do you think has better "networking" or whatever it is you're imagining, urban Northeastern or St. John's or Fordham, versus rural Dartmouth and Williams and suburban Princeton and Duke?
Shrugs.
DP. I don't think you understand college. College kids don't "network." Like, did you imagine them metroing over to the nearest investment bank, knocking on the door, and joining up for happy hour? lol
Erm, college kids do network. That's partially the purpose of business fraternities, engineering fraternities, regular fraternities and other social and academic organizations.
And in environments where there are multiple colleges nearby, similar college organizations from various schools will set up events together (beyond parties).
PP I don't think you realize the ambitiousness of college students these days. Mediocre college students perhaps don't network and perhaps spend the entirety of college smoking weed in their dorms.
Ambitious, go-getter types do. And college networking does not consist of going to happy hour (even networking in the job market does not consist of going to happy hour lmao).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Erm, college kids do network. That's partially the purpose of business fraternities, engineering fraternities, regular fraternities and other social and academic organizations.
And in environments where there are multiple colleges nearby, similar college organizations from various schools will set up events together (beyond parties).
PP I don't think you realize the ambitiousness of college students these days. Mediocre college students perhaps don't network and perhaps spend the entirety of college smoking weed in their dorms.
Ambitious, go-getter types do. And college networking does not consist of going to happy hour (even networking in the job market does not consist of going to happy hour lmao).
I had no clue how to network in college. I was hardworking and pretty smart but not ivy level. Did go to ivy for grad school but didn’t pick up any networking skills there either. I think it is very hard for kids who don’t come from wealthy connected families.
You're correct, students who come from a poor, working-class or middle-class background and go to one of the elite private colleges do feel out of place and have a harder time networking (and anything social) in college. Thats the benefit of colleges in urban environments, the working-class student is not entirely stuck within the culture of their college, they can go out and take advantage of opportunities in the city and get to know students from other colleges in proximity to network.
Meanwhile a working-class student at an isolated rural/suburban elite private will feel isolated. Sure, there might be others similar to them, but its a limited number of people compared to at elite privates in urban metros who can take advantage of city and students at the other colleges in the city.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Erm, college kids do network. That's partially the purpose of business fraternities, engineering fraternities, regular fraternities and other social and academic organizations.
And in environments where there are multiple colleges nearby, similar college organizations from various schools will set up events together (beyond parties).
PP I don't think you realize the ambitiousness of college students these days. Mediocre college students perhaps don't network and perhaps spend the entirety of college smoking weed in their dorms.
Ambitious, go-getter types do. And college networking does not consist of going to happy hour (even networking in the job market does not consist of going to happy hour lmao).
I had no clue how to network in college. I was hardworking and pretty smart but not ivy level. Did go to ivy for grad school but didn’t pick up any networking skills there either. I think it is very hard for kids who don’t come from wealthy connected families.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No, I'm suggesting that students that may get into both Princeton and Harvard may, despite Princeton having a better undergraduate education, choose Harvard in part due to having proximity to MIT and the wider Boston area.
The idea of location preference is not a crazy one.
Let's help you out again; per the OP "Did not apply to Harvard, Yale, Brown or Dartmouth. Waitlisted at UPenn."
Let's help you out again: The argument is regarding isolated suburban colleges and non-isolated urban colleges. Do I need to connect the dots for you or are you a big enough girl to get it now?
Such a shame you can't articulate your argument either clearly or consistently. You aren't helping yourself, much less the OP.
My position has been rather clear and consistent, however at some point the conversation needs to be at a high-school level, not a kindergarten one as you might prefer.
Do you enjoy being a kid?
Who do you think has better "networking" or whatever it is you're imagining, urban Northeastern or St. John's or Fordham, versus rural Dartmouth and Williams and suburban Princeton and Duke?
Shrugs.
DP. I don't think you understand college. College kids don't "network." Like, did you imagine them metroing over to the nearest investment bank, knocking on the door, and joining up for happy hour? lol
Erm, college kids do network. That's partially the purpose of business fraternities, engineering fraternities, regular fraternities and other social and academic organizations.
And in environments where there are multiple colleges nearby, similar college organizations from various schools will set up events together (beyond parties).
PP I don't think you realize the ambitiousness of college students these days. Mediocre college students perhaps don't network and perhaps spend the entirety of college smoking weed in their dorms.
Ambitious, go-getter types do. And college networking does not consist of going to happy hour (even networking in the job market does not consist of going to happy hour lmao).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No, I'm suggesting that students that may get into both Princeton and Harvard may, despite Princeton having a better undergraduate education, choose Harvard in part due to having proximity to MIT and the wider Boston area.
The idea of location preference is not a crazy one.
Let's help you out again; per the OP "Did not apply to Harvard, Yale, Brown or Dartmouth. Waitlisted at UPenn."
Let's help you out again: The argument is regarding isolated suburban colleges and non-isolated urban colleges. Do I need to connect the dots for you or are you a big enough girl to get it now?
Such a shame you can't articulate your argument either clearly or consistently. You aren't helping yourself, much less the OP.
My position has been rather clear and consistent, however at some point the conversation needs to be at a high-school level, not a kindergarten one as you might prefer.
Do you enjoy being a kid?
Who do you think has better "networking" or whatever it is you're imagining, urban Northeastern or St. John's or Fordham, versus rural Dartmouth and Williams and suburban Princeton and Duke?
Shrugs.
DP. I don't think you understand college. College kids don't "network." Like, did you imagine them metroing over to the nearest investment bank, knocking on the door, and joining up for happy hour? lol
Erm, college kids do network. That's partially the purpose of business fraternities, engineering fraternities, regular fraternities and other social and academic organizations.
And in environments where there are multiple colleges nearby, similar college organizations from various schools will set up events together (beyond parties).
PP I don't think you realize the ambitiousness of college students these days. Mediocre college students perhaps don't network and perhaps spend the entirety of college smoking weed in their dorms.
Ambitious, go-getter types do. And college networking does not consist of going to happy hour (even networking in the job market does not consist of going to happy hour lmao).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No, I'm suggesting that students that may get into both Princeton and Harvard may, despite Princeton having a better undergraduate education, choose Harvard in part due to having proximity to MIT and the wider Boston area.
The idea of location preference is not a crazy one.
Let's help you out again; per the OP "Did not apply to Harvard, Yale, Brown or Dartmouth. Waitlisted at UPenn."
Let's help you out again: The argument is regarding isolated suburban colleges and non-isolated urban colleges. Do I need to connect the dots for you or are you a big enough girl to get it now?
Such a shame you can't articulate your argument either clearly or consistently. You aren't helping yourself, much less the OP.
My position has been rather clear and consistent, however at some point the conversation needs to be at a high-school level, not a kindergarten one as you might prefer.
Do you enjoy being a kid?
Who do you think has better "networking" or whatever it is you're imagining, urban Northeastern or St. John's or Fordham, versus rural Dartmouth and Williams and suburban Princeton and Duke?
Shrugs.
DP. I don't think you understand college. College kids don't "network." Like, did you imagine them metroing over to the nearest investment bank, knocking on the door, and joining up for happy hour? lol
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No, I'm suggesting that students that may get into both Princeton and Harvard may, despite Princeton having a better undergraduate education, choose Harvard in part due to having proximity to MIT and the wider Boston area.
The idea of location preference is not a crazy one.
Let's help you out again; per the OP "Did not apply to Harvard, Yale, Brown or Dartmouth. Waitlisted at UPenn."
Let's help you out again: The argument is regarding isolated suburban colleges and non-isolated urban colleges. Do I need to connect the dots for you or are you a big enough girl to get it now?
Such a shame you can't articulate your argument either clearly or consistently. You aren't helping yourself, much less the OP.
My position has been rather clear and consistent, however at some point the conversation needs to be at a high-school level, not a kindergarten one as you might prefer.
Do you enjoy being a kid?
Who do you think has better "networking" or whatever it is you're imagining, urban Northeastern or St. John's or Fordham, versus rural Dartmouth and Williams and suburban Princeton and Duke?
Shrugs.
DP. I don't think you understand college. College kids don't "network." Like, did you imagine them metroing over to the nearest investment bank, knocking on the door, and joining up for happy hour? lol
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No, I'm suggesting that students that may get into both Princeton and Harvard may, despite Princeton having a better undergraduate education, choose Harvard in part due to having proximity to MIT and the wider Boston area.
The idea of location preference is not a crazy one.
Let's help you out again; per the OP "Did not apply to Harvard, Yale, Brown or Dartmouth. Waitlisted at UPenn."
Let's help you out again: The argument is regarding isolated suburban colleges and non-isolated urban colleges. Do I need to connect the dots for you or are you a big enough girl to get it now?
Such a shame you can't articulate your argument either clearly or consistently. You aren't helping yourself, much less the OP.
My position has been rather clear and consistent, however at some point the conversation needs to be at a high-school level, not a kindergarten one as you might prefer.
Do you enjoy being a kid?
Who do you think has better "networking" or whatever it is you're imagining, urban Northeastern or St. John's or Fordham, versus rural Dartmouth and Williams and suburban Princeton and Duke?
Shrugs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No, I'm suggesting that students that may get into both Princeton and Harvard may, despite Princeton having a better undergraduate education, choose Harvard in part due to having proximity to MIT and the wider Boston area.
The idea of location preference is not a crazy one.
Let's help you out again; per the OP "Did not apply to Harvard, Yale, Brown or Dartmouth. Waitlisted at UPenn."
Let's help you out again: The argument is regarding isolated suburban colleges and non-isolated urban colleges. Do I need to connect the dots for you or are you a big enough girl to get it now?
Such a shame you can't articulate your argument either clearly or consistently. You aren't helping yourself, much less the OP.
My position has been rather clear and consistent, however at some point the conversation needs to be at a high-school level, not a kindergarten one as you might prefer.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No, I'm suggesting that students that may get into both Princeton and Harvard may, despite Princeton having a better undergraduate education, choose Harvard in part due to having proximity to MIT and the wider Boston area.
The idea of location preference is not a crazy one.
I would pick Harvard over Princeton because:
1) location
2) you get to say you went to Harvard. Actual education is overrated. I don’t remember most of what I learned content wise in classes but it doesn’t really matter, does it?
Well, I’d pick Princeton over Harvard because
1. Location
2. The actual education.