Anonymous wrote:How much is the current Head Start funding (total to DCPS and per-school)?
I’m wondering if the schools losing head start because of higher income parents could get parents together to subsidize Head Start level services.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How much is the current Head Start funding (total to DCPS and per-school)?
I’m wondering if the schools losing head start because of higher income parents could get parents together to subsidize Head Start level services.
The total is $14.5 million.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How much is the current Head Start funding (total to DCPS and per-school)?
I’m wondering if the schools losing head start because of higher income parents could get parents together to subsidize Head Start level services.
It. Is. A. Formula. Has nothing to do with whether some parents are viewed to be able to donate money.
DC is one of the few cities that has ECE for anyone who wants it (if they will travel). We've paid for our program with money from Head Start and city funding. The Head Start funds come with requirements related to staffing, training and material and facilities -- and that the money goes to support poor kids (it's ok if a few not poor kids are there too).
So what's happening is that DC is receiving less from the federal government than it has been. The city has to figure out how to distribute the Head Start money it will still have (not an insubstantial sum), within the rules of the grant which says it is for poor kids. And it will need to pay for the rest of ECE out of DCPS dollars.
Anonymous wrote:How much is the current Head Start funding (total to DCPS and per-school)?
I’m wondering if the schools losing head start because of higher income parents could get parents together to subsidize Head Start level services.
Anonymous wrote:How much is the current Head Start funding (total to DCPS and per-school)?
I’m wondering if the schools losing head start because of higher income parents could get parents together to subsidize Head Start level services.
Anonymous wrote:Did anyone else get this letter? Or is this just the troll sock puppeting now? My kid is in PK4 at a school that will be one of the first to lose HS and I got no letter.
Anonymous wrote:Did anyone else get this letter? Or is this just the troll sock puppeting now? My kid is in PK4 at a school that will be one of the first to lose HS and I got no letter.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I could see DCPS trying to keep it at these schools:
Marie Reed
Cleveland
Bruce Monroe
Truesdell
Barnard
Tubman
Brightwood
Dorothy Height
I’m the PP teacher who got the letter. I’m at one of these schools. I don’t remember seeing a list of schools’ statuses. But heard we will be in the 2nd category—losing funding but keeping PK through DCPS? I can’t remember exactly what it said that category was.
Anonymous wrote:It would be realistically easier for Marie Reed and Bancroft to keep it than other schools. Both schools draw kids from all over Columbia Heights. There is a lot of subsidized and low income housing in that neighborhood. Both schools just have to get out and recruit the kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I expect that of the same people who really want their schools to "flip" with more high SES IB children - or who celebrate when they do - are going to be claiming that their school should remain Head Start eligible.
You can't have it both ways.
Exactly and the school that comes to mind is Langley. Lots of boosters on here about ECE being middle class, some families staying past ECE but lo and behold, now only preK 3 has the middle class families, not so much preK 4. Guess the laundry comes out when it comes down to money. LOL!
Anonymous wrote:I could see DCPS trying to keep it at these schools:
Marie Reed
Cleveland
Bruce Monroe
Truesdell
Barnard
Tubman
Brightwood
Dorothy Height
Anonymous wrote:I expect that of the same people who really want their schools to "flip" with more high SES IB children - or who celebrate when they do - are going to be claiming that their school should remain Head Start eligible.
You can't have it both ways.