Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Remember all the crappy people waging on Archie's looks? Light skinned, dark skinned, they were hiding his face, yeh, shut up!

Protect their hearts, Harry. Statement was impeccable.

Honestly, I think Harry is just upset that he isn't adored by the public anymore. MM has ruined his image and this is his version of a tantrum.

Yeah totally. Has nothing to do with his mother's life being ruined and eventually ended by the paparazzi and having some anxiety about that happening to his wife. I'm sure his mother's death and the circumstances surrounding it had no impact on his young mind and personality.

Princess Diana was killed by her drunk driver. I read that had she stayed with her protection than she would be alive. MM is no where near the popularity of Princess Diana. The Sussexes are getting bad advice and I think this lawsuit is not going to help. Nobody likes being lectured about the environment and then watch you follow different rules. They have been having good press with the African tour and now that's all gone. I feel sorry for Thomas Markle. Sure, he made a mistake having the letter published but, probably to him it was the only way to communicate to Meghan.

Diana was hounded by the press FOR YEARS. And regardless of the status of her driver she was killed in a high speed chase trying to evade the paparazzi. If you think Harry thinks rationally about that you are nuts. Don't argue with me about that. My point isn't about Diana's guilt or lack thereof. It is about the perception of her son who was 12 when his mother died while being chased by photographers and after being maligned by the British press despite the fact that her own husband had cheated on HER.

If you think that had no formative effect on him and impacts GREATLY how her perceives his wife being treated by the press (and likely how he perceives William's supposed indiscretions with Rose Hanbury) then you are denying human nature.

I never indicated Harry's perceptions of his mother at all. However, Princess Diana also used the press to her advantage as well. Sure Harry sees that she was hounded and perhaps she was but, Meghan is no Diana.

That is your perception. Harry's perception is pretty critical here. And Harry's perception of what happened to his mother probably heavily influences how Meghan sees what happened to his mother. These are real people with real emotional histories and lives that impact the decisions they make. Not these cartoon villains you make them out to be.

Where did you get the idea that I said they were villains? I am merely stating that this lawsuit will do them no good regardless of what happened to his mother. I never denied that what happened did influence him, however, Meghan is no Diana. Full stop. Just because Prince Harry says it does not make it so.

I can't honestly meaningfully tell the mildly annoyed with the Sussex' posters and the clearly abhorrently racist posters apart. Just because it's all anonymous.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Remember all the crappy people waging on Archie's looks? Light skinned, dark skinned, they were hiding his face, yeh, shut up!

Protect their hearts, Harry. Statement was impeccable.

Honestly, I think Harry is just upset that he isn't adored by the public anymore. MM has ruined his image and this is his version of a tantrum.

Yeah totally. Has nothing to do with his mother's life being ruined and eventually ended by the paparazzi and having some anxiety about that happening to his wife. I'm sure his mother's death and the circumstances surrounding it had no impact on his young mind and personality.

Princess Diana was killed by her drunk driver. I read that had she stayed with her protection than she would be alive. MM is no where near the popularity of Princess Diana. The Sussexes are getting bad advice and I think this lawsuit is not going to help. Nobody likes being lectured about the environment and then watch you follow different rules. They have been having good press with the African tour and now that's all gone. I feel sorry for Thomas Markle. Sure, he made a mistake having the letter published but, probably to him it was the only way to communicate to Meghan.

Diana was hounded by the press FOR YEARS. And regardless of the status of her driver she was killed in a high speed chase trying to evade the paparazzi. If you think Harry thinks rationally about that you are nuts. Don't argue with me about that. My point isn't about Diana's guilt or lack thereof. It is about the perception of her son who was 12 when his mother died while being chased by photographers and after being maligned by the British press despite the fact that her own husband had cheated on HER.

If you think that had no formative effect on him and impacts GREATLY how her perceives his wife being treated by the press (and likely how he perceives William's supposed indiscretions with Rose Hanbury) then you are denying human nature.

I never indicated Harry's perceptions of his mother at all. However, Princess Diana also used the press to her advantage as well. Sure Harry sees that she was hounded and perhaps she was but, Meghan is no Diana.

That is your perception. Harry's perception is pretty critical here. And Harry's perception of what happened to his mother probably heavily influences how Meghan sees what happened to his mother. These are real people with real emotional histories and lives that impact the decisions they make. Not these cartoon villains you make them out to be.

Where did you get the idea that I said they were villains? I am merely stating that this lawsuit will do them no good regardless of what happened to his mother. I never denied that what happened did influence him, however, Meghan is no Diana. Full stop. Just because Prince Harry says it does not make it so.

I can't honestly meaningfully tell the mildly annoyed with the Sussex' posters and the clearly abhorrently racist posters apart. Just because it's all anonymous.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I guess anything to take the attention off of Will and Kate's grifting laziness and the pedophile uncle.

Kate's expecting again, so get ready to complain more about her being lazy.

Anonymous wrote:I guess anything to take the attention off of Will and Kate's grifting laziness and the pedophile uncle.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Notice Kate Middleton hasn’t needed to sue the press. Because she has class.

I’m sure being white helps too.

She sued over the topless pictures. Classy, huh?

She sued over someone invading her privacy. Meghan is suing because...*squints and checks notes* she thought she could play the media and lost?

Kate did yoga topless on her balcony. She sues the press and is “classy” because they invaded her privacy - you know, when she went OUTSIDE with no shirt on.

Meghan writes a private letter that was personal and private. The letter is leaked to the press and Meghan sues for copyright infringement and invasion of privacy.

If Meghan had gone outside topless you would be calling her an attention whore. When Kate does it, she’s classy. Why do you think you have such a huge double standard?

Clam down lady... Kate had an expectation of privacy since she was on vacation at a family members house in France sunbathing without her bikini top- the paps used long range lenses to get these shots (and probably climbed trees to get access) - this letter was given to the media by its recipient- if she should be upset with anyone it should be her dumb self for writing a letter instead of picking up a phone and handling whatever private daddy issues she was having.

+1 Not to mention, everyone is conveniently dismissing the fact that it was her father that gave it to the DM to publish. It's not like they hacked in to her or his private files and stole it. Which makes me wonder what this lawsuit is intended to achieve. Do they not want people to be able to publicize anything that was directly sent to and intended for a recipient if it may be unflattering to the sender? Don't they understand what kind of precedent that would set? The person she should be suing is her father!

+ a million.

Let's see how this case actually ends.

I agree with all of the except- we know how this ends. The British press doesn’t stand a chance vs the royal family. They will settle or get screwed (speaking of the daily mail here).

Meghan is a bully. I say this as a biracial American who knows people who have worked directly with her. My friend did her or before suits and the directive was “I will do anything that makes me rich and famous”, and that is a direct quote.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Notice Kate Middleton hasn’t needed to sue the press. Because she has class.

I’m sure being white helps too.

She sued over the topless pictures. Classy, huh?

She sued over someone invading her privacy. Meghan is suing because...*squints and checks notes* she thought she could play the media and lost?

Kate did yoga topless on her balcony. She sues the press and is “classy” because they invaded her privacy - you know, when she went OUTSIDE with no shirt on.

Meghan writes a private letter that was personal and private. The letter is leaked to the press and Meghan sues for copyright infringement and invasion of privacy.

If Meghan had gone outside topless you would be calling her an attention whore. When Kate does it, she’s classy. Why do you think you have such a huge double standard?

Clam down lady... Kate had an expectation of privacy since she was on vacation at a family members house in France sunbathing without her bikini top- the paps used long range lenses to get these shots (and probably climbed trees to get access) - this letter was given to the media by its recipient- if she should be upset with anyone it should be her dumb self for writing a letter instead of picking up a phone and handling whatever private daddy issues she was having.

+1 Not to mention, everyone is conveniently dismissing the fact that it was her father that gave it to the DM to publish. It's not like they hacked in to her or his private files and stole it. Which makes me wonder what this lawsuit is intended to achieve. Do they not want people to be able to publicize anything that was directly sent to and intended for a recipient if it may be unflattering to the sender? Don't they understand what kind of precedent that would set? The person she should be suing is her father!

+ a million.

Let's see how this case actually ends.

I agree with all of the except- we know how this ends. The British press doesn’t stand a chance vs the royal family. They will settle or get screwed (speaking of the daily mail here).

Meghan is a bully. I say this as a biracial American who knows people who have worked directly with her. My friend did her or before suits and the directive was “I will do anything that makes me rich and famous”, and that is a direct quote.

My friend did her PR*

I don’t buy it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Remember all the crappy people waging on Archie's looks? Light skinned, dark skinned, they were hiding his face, yeh, shut up!

Protect their hearts, Harry. Statement was impeccable.

Honestly, I think Harry is just upset that he isn't adored by the public anymore. MM has ruined his image and this is his version of a tantrum.

Yeah totally. Has nothing to do with his mother's life being ruined and eventually ended by the paparazzi and having some anxiety about that happening to his wife. I'm sure his mother's death and the circumstances surrounding it had no impact on his young mind and personality.

Princess Diana was killed by her drunk driver. I read that had she stayed with her protection than she would be alive. MM is no where near the popularity of Princess Diana. The Sussexes are getting bad advice and I think this lawsuit is not going to help. Nobody likes being lectured about the environment and then watch you follow different rules. They have been having good press with the African tour and now that's all gone. I feel sorry for Thomas Markle. Sure, he made a mistake having the letter published but, probably to him it was the only way to communicate to Meghan.

Diana was hounded by the press FOR YEARS. And regardless of the status of her driver she was killed in a high speed chase trying to evade the paparazzi. If you think Harry thinks rationally about that you are nuts. Don't argue with me about that. My point isn't about Diana's guilt or lack thereof. It is about the perception of her son who was 12 when his mother died while being chased by photographers and after being maligned by the British press despite the fact that her own husband had cheated on HER.

If you think that had no formative effect on him and impacts GREATLY how her perceives his wife being treated by the press (and likely how he perceives William's supposed indiscretions with Rose Hanbury) then you are denying human nature.

I never indicated Harry's perceptions of his mother at all. However, Princess Diana also used the press to her advantage as well. Sure Harry sees that she was hounded and perhaps she was but, Meghan is no Diana.

That is your perception. Harry's perception is pretty critical here. And Harry's perception of what happened to his mother probably heavily influences how Meghan sees what happened to his mother. These are real people with real emotional histories and lives that impact the decisions they make. Not these cartoon villains you make them out to be.

Where did you get the idea that I said they were villains? I am merely stating that this lawsuit will do them no good regardless of what happened to his mother. I never denied that what happened did influence him, however, Meghan is no Diana. Full stop. Just because Prince Harry says it does not make it so.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Notice Kate Middleton hasn’t needed to sue the press. Because she has class.

I’m sure being white helps too.

She sued over the topless pictures. Classy, huh?

She sued over someone invading her privacy. Meghan is suing because...*squints and checks notes* she thought she could play the media and lost?

Kate did yoga topless on her balcony. She sues the press and is “classy” because they invaded her privacy - you know, when she went OUTSIDE with no shirt on.

Meghan writes a private letter that was personal and private. The letter is leaked to the press and Meghan sues for copyright infringement and invasion of privacy.

If Meghan had gone outside topless you would be calling her an attention whore. When Kate does it, she’s classy. Why do you think you have such a huge double standard?

Clam down lady... Kate had an expectation of privacy since she was on vacation at a family members house in France sunbathing without her bikini top- the paps used long range lenses to get these shots (and probably climbed trees to get access) - this letter was given to the media by its recipient- if she should be upset with anyone it should be her dumb self for writing a letter instead of picking up a phone and handling whatever private daddy issues she was having.

+1 Not to mention, everyone is conveniently dismissing the fact that it was her father that gave it to the DM to publish. It's not like they hacked in to her or his private files and stole it. Which makes me wonder what this lawsuit is intended to achieve. Do they not want people to be able to publicize anything that was directly sent to and intended for a recipient if it may be unflattering to the sender? Don't they understand what kind of precedent that would set? The person she should be suing is her father!

+ a million.

Let's see how this case actually ends.

I agree with all of the except- we know how this ends. The British press doesn’t stand a chance vs the royal family. They will settle or get screwed (speaking of the daily mail here).

Meghan is a bully. I say this as a biracial American who knows people who have worked directly with her. My friend did her or before suits and the directive was “I will do anything that makes me rich and famous”, and that is a direct quote.

My friend did her PR*

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Notice Kate Middleton hasn’t needed to sue the press. Because she has class.

I’m sure being white helps too.

She sued over the topless pictures. Classy, huh?

She sued over someone invading her privacy. Meghan is suing because...*squints and checks notes* she thought she could play the media and lost?

Kate did yoga topless on her balcony. She sues the press and is “classy” because they invaded her privacy - you know, when she went OUTSIDE with no shirt on.

Meghan writes a private letter that was personal and private. The letter is leaked to the press and Meghan sues for copyright infringement and invasion of privacy.

If Meghan had gone outside topless you would be calling her an attention whore. When Kate does it, she’s classy. Why do you think you have such a huge double standard?

Clam down lady... Kate had an expectation of privacy since she was on vacation at a family members house in France sunbathing without her bikini top- the paps used long range lenses to get these shots (and probably climbed trees to get access) - this letter was given to the media by its recipient- if she should be upset with anyone it should be her dumb self for writing a letter instead of picking up a phone and handling whatever private daddy issues she was having.

+1 Not to mention, everyone is conveniently dismissing the fact that it was her father that gave it to the DM to publish. It's not like they hacked in to her or his private files and stole it. Which makes me wonder what this lawsuit is intended to achieve. Do they not want people to be able to publicize anything that was directly sent to and intended for a recipient if it may be unflattering to the sender? Don't they understand what kind of precedent that would set? The person she should be suing is her father!

+ a million.

Let's see how this case actually ends.

I agree with all of the except- we know how this ends. The British press doesn’t stand a chance vs the royal family. They will settle or get screwed (speaking of the daily mail here).

Meghan is a bully. I say this as a biracial American who knows people who have worked directly with her. My friend did her or before suits and the directive was “I will do anything that makes me rich and famous”, and that is a direct quote.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Notice Kate Middleton hasn’t needed to sue the press. Because she has class.

I’m sure being white helps too.

She sued over the topless pictures. Classy, huh?

She sued over someone invading her privacy. Meghan is suing because...*squints and checks notes* she thought she could play the media and lost?

Kate did yoga topless on her balcony. She sues the press and is “classy” because they invaded her privacy - you know, when she went OUTSIDE with no shirt on.

Meghan writes a private letter that was personal and private. The letter is leaked to the press and Meghan sues for copyright infringement and invasion of privacy.

If Meghan had gone outside topless you would be calling her an attention whore. When Kate does it, she’s classy. Why do you think you have such a huge double standard?

Clam down lady... Kate had an expectation of privacy since she was on vacation at a family members house in France sunbathing without her bikini top- the paps used long range lenses to get these shots (and probably climbed trees to get access) - this letter was given to the media by its recipient- if she should be upset with anyone it should be her dumb self for writing a letter instead of picking up a phone and handling whatever private daddy issues she was having.

+1 Not to mention, everyone is conveniently dismissing the fact that it was her father that gave it to the DM to publish. It's not like they hacked in to her or his private files and stole it. Which makes me wonder what this lawsuit is intended to achieve. Do they not want people to be able to publicize anything that was directly sent to and intended for a recipient if it may be unflattering to the sender? Don't they understand what kind of precedent that would set? The person she should be suing is her father!

+ a million.

Let's see how this case actually ends.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:i also think MM looks a little like Wallis Simpson - its the close set eyes

Please. Wallis is much more attractive.

Hmmm...this just says so much about the person you are.

DP. They do like similar. Both have dark hair, fair skin, close set eyes, prominent pointy nose. These are factual observations so not sure what that says about anyone other than the fact that we can see.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Remember all the crappy people waging on Archie's looks? Light skinned, dark skinned, they were hiding his face, yeh, shut up!

Protect their hearts, Harry. Statement was impeccable.

Honestly, I think Harry is just upset that he isn't adored by the public anymore. MM has ruined his image and this is his version of a tantrum.

Yeah totally. Has nothing to do with his mother's life being ruined and eventually ended by the paparazzi and having some anxiety about that happening to his wife. I'm sure his mother's death and the circumstances surrounding it had no impact on his young mind and personality.

Princess Diana was killed by her drunk driver. I read that had she stayed with her protection than she would be alive. MM is no where near the popularity of Princess Diana. The Sussexes are getting bad advice and I think this lawsuit is not going to help. Nobody likes being lectured about the environment and then watch you follow different rules. They have been having good press with the African tour and now that's all gone. I feel sorry for Thomas Markle. Sure, he made a mistake having the letter published but, probably to him it was the only way to communicate to Meghan.

Diana was hounded by the press FOR YEARS. And regardless of the status of her driver she was killed in a high speed chase trying to evade the paparazzi. If you think Harry thinks rationally about that you are nuts. Don't argue with me about that. My point isn't about Diana's guilt or lack thereof. It is about the perception of her son who was 12 when his mother died while being chased by photographers and after being maligned by the British press despite the fact that her own husband had cheated on HER.

If you think that had no formative effect on him and impacts GREATLY how her perceives his wife being treated by the press (and likely how he perceives William's supposed indiscretions with Rose Hanbury) then you are denying human nature.

I never indicated Harry's perceptions of his mother at all. However, Princess Diana also used the press to her advantage as well. Sure Harry sees that she was hounded and perhaps she was but, Meghan is no Diana.

That is your perception. Harry's perception is pretty critical here. And Harry's perception of what happened to his mother probably heavily influences how Meghan sees what happened to his mother. These are real people with real emotional histories and lives that impact the decisions they make. Not these cartoon villains you make them out to be.