Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In other words, you can't name any specific school which "constantly focus[es] on that." I'm fairly sure that no DC area school falls under this category.
Focuses on what? Is this the right thread?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just sit and chat about the latest SJW book out.
And this describes which school's core curriculum?
And school that ignores or downplays the basics to constantly focus on that. Opportunity cost of time in k-12 education is real. Only so many hours in a day or week. And year in America. The lost education really compounds.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Teachers don’t give high marks to introverts who don’t speak in class, argue their thoughts, or ask for the rec.
But some do let the loud mouth extroverts dominate the conversation and reprimand those who try to interrupt or interject to get a word in edgewise, which shuts them up.
Some teachers, not many though, find subtle ways to engage introverted students in meaningful ways.
Being introverted is mostly genetic character trait and these students can still offer a lot when given the opportunity.
For example, asking students to email them each week with questions/ areas of special interest to deep dive into - so they do not have to compete with loud students to focus attention on pets of curriculum that pique their interest.
This sounds trite, but not calling on the same five students and keeping a log of who has contributed to try and keep inputs more even.
Making class room safe for different types of personalities by validating different forms of engagement. For example, submitting observations in writing as well as speaking up.
Probably veteran quality teachers have more ways they manage introverts. Quality of teachers makes a huge difference for introverted students.
Of course, some teachers are great. This thread is focused on what happens if grades are left entirely to narratives from all teachers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Teachers don’t give high marks to introverts who don’t speak in class, argue their thoughts, or ask for the rec.
But some do let the loud mouth extroverts dominate the conversation and reprimand those who try to interrupt or interject to get a word in edgewise, which shuts them up.
Some teachers, not many though, find subtle ways to engage introverted students in meaningful ways.
Being introverted is mostly genetic character trait and these students can still offer a lot when given the opportunity.
For example, asking students to email them each week with questions/ areas of special interest to deep dive into - so they do not have to compete with loud students to focus attention on pets of curriculum that pique their interest.
This sounds trite, but not calling on the same five students and keeping a log of who has contributed to try and keep inputs more even.
Making class room safe for different types of personalities by validating different forms of engagement. For example, submitting observations in writing as well as speaking up.
Probably veteran quality teachers have more ways they manage introverts. Quality of teachers makes a huge difference for introverted students.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Teachers don’t give high marks to introverts who don’t speak in class, argue their thoughts, or ask for the rec.
But some do let the loud mouth extroverts dominate the conversation and reprimand those who try to interrupt or interject to get a word in edgewise, which shuts them up.
Some teachers, not many though, find subtle ways to engage introverted students in meaningful ways.
Being introverted is mostly genetic character trait and these students can still offer a lot when given the opportunity.
For example, asking students to email them each week with questions/ areas of special interest to deep dive into - so they do not have to compete with loud students to focus attention on pets of curriculum that pique their interest.
This sounds trite, but not calling on the same five students and keeping a log of who has contributed to try and keep inputs more even.
Making class room safe for different types of personalities by validating different forms of engagement. For example, submitting observations in writing as well as speaking up.
Probably veteran quality teachers have more ways they manage introverts. Quality of teachers makes a huge difference for introverted students.
Some of my best students have been introverts, at all ages from middle school and up. Corresponding with them privately often reveals a wide range of interests and a desire for extra work. Their submitted work is often superior in part because they aren't friend-focused 24/7 so they focus better on schoolwork. And finally, teachers learn to cold call as much as asking for volunteers to answer, including everyone at one point or another.
These crass generalizations about teachers and introverts are shallow at best.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Teachers don’t give high marks to introverts who don’t speak in class, argue their thoughts, or ask for the rec.
But some do let the loud mouth extroverts dominate the conversation and reprimand those who try to interrupt or interject to get a word in edgewise, which shuts them up.
Some teachers, not many though, find subtle ways to engage introverted students in meaningful ways.
Being introverted is mostly genetic character trait and these students can still offer a lot when given the opportunity.
For example, asking students to email them each week with questions/ areas of special interest to deep dive into - so they do not have to compete with loud students to focus attention on pets of curriculum that pique their interest.
This sounds trite, but not calling on the same five students and keeping a log of who has contributed to try and keep inputs more even.
Making class room safe for different types of personalities by validating different forms of engagement. For example, submitting observations in writing as well as speaking up.
Probably veteran quality teachers have more ways they manage introverts. Quality of teachers makes a huge difference for introverted students.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Aren’t letter grades pretty artificial as it is? Tests give objective numbers, yes, but they are generally given under artificial time constraints that favor those who can do it faster, not necessarily better. Also, many classes have a “participation” component that favors the extrovert who waxes philosophical nonsense to buffer test grades, while the introvert kid who deeply understands material may not. There is a lot of room for subjectivity there.
Also the difference between an 89 and a 90 is 1.1% but the difference between an A- and a B+ is >11% even though the A- student was “better” than the B+ student by the slimmest possible amount.
Finally, the meaning of letter grades is not fixed. In the middle of the 20th century the median grade was a C. Now the median grade at Harvard is an A. I don’t know if rampant grade inflation is good, bad, both or neither, but I am confident is not as “objective” as people like to think.
I know! Exactly! Just can all forms of measurement. Just set a low bar, call it mastery or proficiency, and watch everyone soar!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Teachers don’t give high marks to introverts who don’t speak in class, argue their thoughts, or ask for the rec.
But some do let the loud mouth extroverts dominate the conversation and reprimand those who try to interrupt or interject to get a word in edgewise, which shuts them up.
Anonymous wrote:Teachers don’t give high marks to introverts who don’t speak in class, argue their thoughts, or ask for the rec.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In other words, you can't name any specific school which "constantly focus[es] on that." I'm fairly sure that no DC area school falls under this category.
Focuses on what? Is this the right thread?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just sit and chat about the latest SJW book out.
And this describes which school's core curriculum?
And school that ignores or downplays the basics to constantly focus on that. Opportunity cost of time in k-12 education is real. Only so many hours in a day or week. And year in America. The lost education really compounds.
Anonymous wrote:In other words, you can't name any specific school which "constantly focus[es] on that." I'm fairly sure that no DC area school falls under this category.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Aren’t letter grades pretty artificial as it is? Tests give objective numbers, yes, but they are generally given under artificial time constraints that favor those who can do it faster, not necessarily better. Also, many classes have a “participation” component that favors the extrovert who waxes philosophical nonsense to buffer test grades, while the introvert kid who deeply understands material may not. There is a lot of room for subjectivity there.
Also the difference between an 89 and a 90 is 1.1% but the difference between an A- and a B+ is >11% even though the A- student was “better” than the B+ student by the slimmest possible amount.
Finally, the meaning of letter grades is not fixed. In the middle of the 20th century the median grade was a C. Now the median grade at Harvard is an A. I don’t know if rampant grade inflation is good, bad, both or neither, but I am confident is not as “objective” as people like to think.
I know! Exactly! Just can all forms of measurement. Just set a low bar, call it mastery or proficiency, and watch everyone soar!!
Introverts are very capable of expressing our thoughts, thank you very much.