Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Fck off. I worked for my "privilege". My parents were the first in my family to go to college. I resent this being counted against my kids for purely political reasons.

You really don’t get it apparently.

I’m a lawyer in biglaw. No one in the building works harder than the janitorial staff. And many of them have second and third jobs. Lots of people work hard. But their hard work doesn’t help their kids like mine does.

Anonymous wrote:Privilege provides greater access to opportunity.
For years people who were privileged enough to be able-bodied with hearing and eyesight and two functioning legs had more access to opportunities than handicapped individuals, right?
We’re handicapped and disabled people less intelligent, less hard-working, or less capable of contributing to society?
NO.
When changes were implemented to make accommodations for handicapped and disabled individuals they proved that when given more opportunities they could be useful and productive and pioneering members of society.
People of color are not less intelligent less hard-working or less capable of contributing to society. People born into poverty are not less intelligent, less hard-working, or less capable of contributing to society.
Non-whites are not inherently lacking in morals or work ethics or innovative ideas they are lacking in opportunity.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Honestly if you kid doesn't get into HPY and goes to say, UVA- what do you think will happen? Do you really think their future is lost? Are you afraid they will end up on the streets?

Seriously please help me understand...

Well, let's turn it around and look at it another way. Would it be the end of the world if "not enough" underprivileged (meaning, black and Hispanic, because that's what this is "adversity score" nonsense really all about) kids didn't get into HYP and had to go to George Mason instead? NO. What if they went to vocational school instead? Would their future be lost? NO. But this is obviously an unacceptable outcome to the Left, or they wouldn't be exerting ourselves mightily to take race into account without taking race into account.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:congratulations african americans you have taken another term to further your victimization status

wake up look at all the Hispanics and Asians passing you who could care less about privilege instead they work hard and are getting ahead in society

When were Hispanics and Asians ev
er behind blacks on the discrimination scale?

This is so dumb. There are MORE poor white ppl in this country than blacks. I actually predict this will help white rural people quite a bit as well as poor asians.

https://www.kff.org/other/state-indicator/poverty-rate-by-raceethnicity/?dataView=1¤tTimeframe=0&sortModel=%7B%22colId%22:%22Location%22,%22sort%22:%22asc%22%7D

True but if a poor white man puts on some grubby khakis and a t-shirt and walks into a building it's assumed he belongs there and that he is a and productive member of society who just has poor taste in clothing.
If you put a poor black man in some grubby khakis and a t-shirt when he walks into a building it's assumed he doesn't belong there and that he is probably a criminal with a record a mile long. Hell the same presumptions would be made even when a black man walks into a building wearing a suit and donning a briefcase.

according to who this is so much f%^&ing bs. Seriously get out of your victim bubble. Have you been to a fortune 500 company recently. There is all sorts of diversity.

And that is due to what? Is it due to the fact that blacks work hard and are getting ahead in society or is it due to blacks benefiting from courtesy handouts from companies trying to be more diverse?
If its the former then you need to tell the originator of this specific post who said the above in bold to STFU. If its the latter then you need to STFU.

I'm the same poster all of this is bs. Work hard get ahead period end of story. How don't you go ahead playing the victim card. That goes for whites, blacks, asians, hispanics, rich, poor, everyone.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:congratulations african americans you have taken another term to further your victimization status

wake up look at all the Hispanics and Asians passing you who could care less about privilege instead they work hard and are getting ahead in society

When were Hispanics and Asians ev
er behind blacks on the discrimination scale?

This is so dumb. There are MORE poor white ppl in this country than blacks. I actually predict this will help white rural people quite a bit as well as poor asians.

https://www.kff.org/other/state-indicator/poverty-rate-by-raceethnicity/?dataView=1¤tTimeframe=0&sortModel=%7B%22colId%22:%22Location%22,%22sort%22:%22asc%22%7D

True but if a poor white man puts on some grubby khakis and a t-shirt and walks into a building it's assumed he belongs there and that he is a and productive member of society who just has poor taste in clothing.
If you put a poor black man in some grubby khakis and a t-shirt when he walks into a building it's assumed he doesn't belong there and that he is probably a criminal with a record a mile long. Hell the same presumptions would be made even when a black man walks into a building wearing a suit and donning a briefcase.

according to who this is so much f%^&ing bs. Seriously get out of your victim bubble. Have you been to a fortune 500 company recently. There is all sorts of diversity.

And that is due to what? Is it due to the fact that blacks work hard and are getting ahead in society or is it due to blacks benefiting from courtesy handouts from companies trying to be more diverse?
If its the former then you need to tell the originator of this specific post who said the above in bold to STFU. If its the latter then you need to STFU.

I'm the same poster all of this is bs. Work hard get ahead period end of story. How don't you go ahead playing the victim card. That goes for whites, blacks, asians, hispanics, rich, poor, everyone.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:congratulations african americans you have taken another term to further your victimization status

wake up look at all the Hispanics and Asians passing you who could care less about privilege instead they work hard and are getting ahead in society

When were Hispanics and Asians ev
er behind blacks on the discrimination scale?

This is so dumb. There are MORE poor white ppl in this country than blacks. I actually predict this will help white rural people quite a bit as well as poor asians.

https://www.kff.org/other/state-indicator/poverty-rate-by-raceethnicity/?dataView=1¤tTimeframe=0&sortModel=%7B%22colId%22:%22Location%22,%22sort%22:%22asc%22%7D

True but if a poor white man puts on some grubby khakis and a t-shirt and walks into a building it's assumed he belongs there and that he is a and productive member of society who just has poor taste in clothing.
If you put a poor black man in some grubby khakis and a t-shirt when he walks into a building it's assumed he doesn't belong there and that he is probably a criminal with a record a mile long. Hell the same presumptions would be made even when a black man walks into a building wearing a suit and donning a briefcase.

according to who this is so much f%^&ing bs. Seriously get out of your victim bubble. Have you been to a fortune 500 company recently. There is all sorts of diversity.

And that is due to what? Is it due to the fact that blacks work hard and are getting ahead in society or is it due to blacks benefiting from courtesy handouts from companies trying to be more diverse?
If its the former then you need to tell the originator of this specific post who said the above in bold to STFU. If its the latter then you need to STFU.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:congratulations african americans you have taken another term to further your victimization status

wake up look at all the Hispanics and Asians passing you who could care less about privilege instead they work hard and are getting ahead in society

When were Hispanics and Asians ev
er behind blacks on the discrimination scale?

This is so dumb. There are MORE poor white ppl in this country than blacks. I actually predict this will help white rural people quite a bit as well as poor asians.

https://www.kff.org/other/state-indicator/poverty-rate-by-raceethnicity/?dataView=1¤tTimeframe=0&sortModel=%7B%22colId%22:%22Location%22,%22sort%22:%22asc%22%7D

True but if a poor white man puts on some grubby khakis and a t-shirt and walks into a building it's assumed he belongs there and that he is a and productive member of society who just has poor taste in clothing.
If you put a poor black man in some grubby khakis and a t-shirt when he walks into a building it's assumed he doesn't belong there and that he is probably a criminal with a record a mile long. Hell the same presumptions would be made even when a black man walks into a building wearing a suit and donning a briefcase.

according to who this is so much f%^&ing bs. Seriously get out of your victim bubble. Have you been to a fortune 500 company recently. There is all sorts of diversity.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:congratulations african americans you have taken another term to further your victimization status

wake up look at all the Hispanics and Asians passing you who could care less about privilege instead they work hard and are getting ahead in society

When were Hispanics and Asians ev
er behind blacks on the discrimination scale?

This is so dumb. There are MORE poor white ppl in this country than blacks. I actually predict this will help white rural people quite a bit as well as poor asians.

https://www.kff.org/other/state-indicator/poverty-rate-by-raceethnicity/?dataView=1¤tTimeframe=0&sortModel=%7B%22colId%22:%22Location%22,%22sort%22:%22asc%22%7D

True but if a poor white man puts on some grubby khakis and a t-shirt and walks into a building it's assumed he belongs there and that he is a and productive member of society who just has poor taste in clothing.
If you put a poor black man in some grubby khakis and a t-shirt when he walks into a building it's assumed he doesn't belong there and that he is probably a criminal with a record a mile long. Hell the same presumptions would be made even when a black man walks into a building wearing a suit and donning a briefcase.

Agreed.

I can easily spot the difference between an unproductive poor white and a productive affluent African American. Actually, I can spot the difference between poor unproductive people and productive working people regardless of the race and origins.



according to who this is so much f%^&ing bs. Seriously get out of your victim bubble. Have you been to a fortune 500 company recently. There is all sorts of diversity.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:congratulations african americans you have taken another term to further your victimization status

wake up look at all the Hispanics and Asians passing you who could care less about privilege instead they work hard and are getting ahead in society

When were Hispanics and Asians ev
er behind blacks on the discrimination scale?

This is so dumb. There are MORE poor white ppl in this country than blacks. I actually predict this will help white rural people quite a bit as well as poor asians.

https://www.kff.org/other/state-indicator/poverty-rate-by-raceethnicity/?dataView=1¤tTimeframe=0&sortModel=%7B%22colId%22:%22Location%22,%22sort%22:%22asc%22%7D

True but if a poor white man puts on some grubby khakis and a t-shirt and walks into a building it's assumed he belongs there and that he is a and productive member of society who just has poor taste in clothing.
If you put a poor black man in some grubby khakis and a t-shirt when he walks into a building it's assumed he doesn't belong there and that he is probably a criminal with a record a mile long. Hell the same presumptions would be made even when a black man walks into a building wearing a suit and donning a briefcase.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:congratulations african americans you have taken another term to further your victimization status

wake up look at all the Hispanics and Asians passing you who could care less about privilege instead they work hard and are getting ahead in society

When were Hispanics and Asians ev
er behind blacks on the discrimination scale?

This is so dumb. There are MORE poor white ppl in this country than blacks. I actually predict this will help white rural people quite a bit as well as poor asians.

https://www.kff.org/other/state-indicator/poverty-rate-by-raceethnicity/?dataView=1¤tTimeframe=0&sortModel=%7B%22colId%22:%22Location%22,%22sort%22:%22asc%22%7D

True but if a poor white man puts on some grubby khakis and a t-shirt and walks into a building it's assumed he belongs there and that he is a and productive member of society who just has poor taste in clothing.
If you put a poor black man in some grubby khakis and a t-shirt when he walks into a building it's assumed he doesn't belong there and that he is probably a criminal with a record a mile long. Hell the same presumptions would be made even when a black man walks into a building wearing a suit and donning a briefcase.

Donning a briefcase?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:congratulations african americans you have taken another term to further your victimization status

wake up look at all the Hispanics and Asians passing you who could care less about privilege instead they work hard and are getting ahead in society

When were Hispanics and Asians ev
er behind blacks on the discrimination scale?

This is so dumb. There are MORE poor white ppl in this country than blacks. I actually predict this will help white rural people quite a bit as well as poor asians.

https://www.kff.org/other/state-indicator/poverty-rate-by-raceethnicity/?dataView=1¤tTimeframe=0&sortModel=%7B%22colId%22:%22Location%22,%22sort%22:%22asc%22%7D

True but if a poor white man puts on some grubby khakis and a t-shirt and walks into a building it's assumed he belongs there and that he is a and productive member of society who just has poor taste in clothing.
If you put a poor black man in some grubby khakis and a t-shirt when he walks into a building it's assumed he doesn't belong there and that he is probably a criminal with a record a mile long. Hell the same presumptions would be made even when a black man walks into a building wearing a suit and donning a briefcase.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:congratulations african americans you have taken another term to further your victimization status

wake up look at all the Hispanics and Asians passing you who could care less about privilege instead they work hard and are getting ahead in society

When were Hispanics and Asians ev
er behind blacks on the discrimination scale?

This is so dumb. There are MORE poor white ppl in this country than blacks. I actually predict this will help white rural people quite a bit as well as poor asians.

https://www.kff.org/other/state-indicator/poverty-rate-by-raceethnicity/?dataView=1¤tTimeframe=0&sortModel=%7B%22colId%22:%22Location%22,%22sort%22:%22asc%22%7D

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:congratulations african americans you have taken another term to further your victimization status

wake up look at all the Hispanics and Asians passing you who could care less about privilege instead they work hard and are getting ahead in society

When were Hispanics and Asians ev
er behind blacks on the discrimination scale?