Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If MCPS keeps lowering the ceiling to reduce the gap, the kids from the poor and uninformed parents will be the one who will be truely hurt by by the policy. The informed parents will notice that their child could not receive proper education and turn to outside help. At the end the third party test scores like SAT or ACT will reveal who have the knowledge to be ready for college and who fail to master basic math, science and English in MCPS.
Good news! MCPS isn't!
Have you seen the MCPS custom district literacy and math tests?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If MCPS keeps lowering the ceiling to reduce the gap, the kids from the poor and uninformed parents will be the one who will be truely hurt by by the policy. The informed parents will notice that their child could not receive proper education and turn to outside help. At the end the third party test scores like SAT or ACT will reveal who have the knowledge to be ready for college and who fail to master basic math, science and English in MCPS.
Good news! MCPS isn't!
Anonymous wrote:If MCPS keeps lowering the ceiling to reduce the gap, the kids from the poor and uninformed parents will be the one who will be truely hurt by by the policy. The informed parents will notice that their child could not receive proper education and turn to outside help. At the end the third party test scores like SAT or ACT will reveal who have the knowledge to be ready for college and who fail to master basic math, science and English in MCPS.
Anonymous wrote:Having more low performing kids at your school doesn’t hurt your kid. [/b]The biggest predictors of educational CPS kids WANT more diversity. Thank goodness the kids are not as fearful as the parents.
ok
It slows down the pacing of instruction and makes if much harder on the teacher to plan and grade. On level used to be for kids with strong enough foundation. Now it's become a skills' class. You've heard this before - again and again and again.
So if low performers are added to a school, your on level child will become bored, as the majority of time will be spent on remediation.
I know you all don't "get it" b/c you're not in the classroom. But so many of you REFUSE to listen, too.
just turn a deaf ear . . .
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Having more low performing kids at your school doesn’t hurt your kid. [/b]The biggest predictors of educational CPS kids WANT more diversity. Thank goodness the kids are not as fearful as the parents.
ok
It slows down the pacing of instruction and makes if much harder on the teacher to plan and grade. On level used to be for kids with strong enough foundation. Now it's become a skills' class. You've heard this before - again and again and again.
So if low performers are added to a school, your on level child will become bored, as the majority of time will be spent on remediation.
I know you all don't "get it" b/c you're not in the classroom. But so many of you REFUSE to listen, too.
just turn a deaf ear . . .
Anybody reading DCUM would think that the only "low performers" are poor/black/brown kids zoned for other schools. No "low performers" with family backgrounds like mine, living in my neighborhood, no sir!