Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Never got or wanted a cent from my parents. Navigated myself to plenty of money. I have to admit I feel superior and stronger than friends who were subsidized. I can't see Clint Eastwood or James Bond going to Mommy and Daddy as adults for sustenance. It's not sexy.
This is true for me, as well. I have to admit that I do judge people who have received substantial help from parents. You know, the people whose house or car or vacations or credit card debt are paid for by their parents. There IS something 'weak' about them.
Anonymous wrote:I grew up poor and black (gen Xer, not millenial). I was able to get into college and then law school. I paid for both with loans. My husband is comes from a UMC white family and didn't have loans because his parents paid. He works hard and so do I. We paid for our own wedding and the down payment on our house ourselves. Both of his parents are still alive but have resources because they worked hard and because they inherited sums of money when their parents passed. Meanwhile, I pay my mother's pharmacy co-pays, any new clothes she needs, her phone and cable bill, newspaper and magazine subscriptions and all of her luxuries in life. This is the story of this country. His family continues to benefit from wealth inherited for generations while there is none in my side of the family.
Anonymous wrote:Never got or wanted a cent from my parents. Navigated myself to plenty of money. I have to admit I feel superior and stronger than friends who were subsidized. I can't see Clint Eastwood or James Bond going to Mommy and Daddy as adults for sustenance. It's not sexy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have a friend who worked at a luxury car dealer - a surprising number of parents buy cars for their adult children
I used to work in a wealth industry - many UMC parents heavily subsidize their children’s lifestyles (pay for country club memberships, school, car, home, etc) because they want their children to portray a certain amount of success.
This isn't it at all. Likely there are several things going on.
1. They are worried that if they don't have some of those things that they will be tempted to move away to cheaper areas.
2. they have the money
3. They would rather give the money to family than the tax man at the time of their death
4. they would rather be living and watching their kids enjoy the money rather than getting a pile of cash when they are dead
5. They probably think that if they buy some of those things the kids can prioritize savings for their kids in a way they wouldn't otherwise be able to do and therefore continue the cycle for their grandkids
6. Human nature - they want to get things for their kids that make them happy.
7. Things like private school tuition are extremely tax efficient.
This is it - maybe not the whole list but this is how we will do things when the time comes and will have an up front conversation about why we are doing them.
Anonymous wrote:I have a friend who worked at a luxury car dealer - a surprising number of parents buy cars for their adult children
I used to work in a wealth industry - many UMC parents heavily subsidize their children’s lifestyles (pay for country club memberships, school, car, home, etc) because they want their children to portray a certain amount of success.