Anonymous wrote:What a weird thread. GMU is certainly not a traditionally beautiful campus, but it's hardly ugly. Are you just intentionally wanting to talk smack about GMU?
Anonymous wrote:It's not aesthetically pretty, but it's far from the ugliest.
Anonymous wrote:The hard tech schools tend to have somewhat lower graduation rates. It is just harder to finish engineering in 4 years. MIT 4 year graduation rate is below UVA and W&M, but it has much higher standardized test scores. 5 and 6 years rise quite a bit. https://www.collegefactual.com/colleges/massachusetts-institute-of-technology/academic-life/graduation-and-retention
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:GMU reminds me of W&M’s “new” campus. Old campus is beautiful but many people like me spent the vast majority of their time in 1960s-era brick buildings, just like GMUs. It didn’t diminish the quality of my education in the slightest. I think GMU is very pretty and its relative newness goes in the pro column for our DC.
William and Mary still has work to do with its new campus, but there have been significant renovations and improvements. Morton Hall, however....
Anonymous wrote:We drove a few blocks off campus in all directions to get a vibe of the neighborhood. Have you driven back behind the new Hylton Performing Arts Center?
Anonymous wrote:Did we decide if it’s the ugliest campus ever?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did we decide if it’s the ugliest campus ever?
Just the one vote so far.
I don't understand the conversation police in on-line forums--in real life conversations the most boring ones are the ones where people answer your questions to the point and never divert from the topic.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did we decide if it’s the ugliest campus ever?
Just the one vote so far.
Anonymous wrote:Did we decide if it’s the ugliest campus ever?