Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well, some of the superhero films are quite well acted. Dr. Strange, Black Panther. This one doesn't look of the same caliber, but I guess if it's good fun with eye candy that's something.

That’s 2 movies out of how many?

Set realistic expectations for a superhero movie. Attractive lead with a few laughs.

Thor Ragnarok is incredibly good.

To each there own bc I def wouldn’t call it incredibly good.

DP Ironman, Capt America Winter Soldier and SpiderMan Homecoming were good.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I need him to do a romantic comedy.

ooohhhh me too!!

I can’t inagine him as anything but a superhero. He is super hot, but in a “take me now” way. Not in a flirty romcom way.

Pretty much. If you’d seen him act in scenes where he was dating in other shows you would see her bomb in a rom com.

It’d be like watching John Cena take over The Bachelor.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I need him to do a romantic comedy.

ooohhhh me too!!

I can’t inagine him as anything but a superhero. He is super hot, but in a “take me now” way. Not in a flirty romcom way.

Anonymous wrote:I need him to do a romantic comedy.

ooohhhh me too!!

I need him to do a romantic comedy.

Anonymous wrote:How much money do the principal actors make when a movie is so successful? Do they just get a salary or also a cut of the profits?

Depends on what they negotiated on the front end and how big of a star they were before this. I believe Jason Momoa might get a cut of the profits because he has a long history in Hollywood but people like Daisy Ridley who only got $300,000 in Star Wars: Force Awakens even though it was guaranteed to make a billion (it actually made $2 billion) - no they don't get a cut of the profits.

He btw go paid $14 million for Aquaman.