Anonymous wrote:Looks like Higgenlooper is going to switch to the CO Senate race.

Beto should do the same thing down in Texas.

Anonymous wrote:Looks like Higgenlooper is going to switch to the CO Senate race.

Great

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like Higgenlooper is going to switch to the CO Senate race.

Yup.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/13/us/politics/john-hickenlooper-2020-senate.html#click=https://t.co/4e0DEuhJ9N

I would love to see him in the Senate, and it seems like he has a real shot. I hope others of the 2020 candidates take this path too.

Anonymous wrote:Good. WH race is too crowded.

+1

Good. WH race is too crowded.

Anonymous wrote:Looks like Higgenlooper is going to switch to the CO Senate race.

Yup.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/13/us/politics/john-hickenlooper-2020-senate.html#click=https://t.co/4e0DEuhJ9N

Looks like Higgenlooper is going to switch to the CO Senate race.

Anonymous wrote:McSally’s appointment is being challenged in court:
https://amp.azcentral.com/amp/1968936001?__twitter_impression=true

Over two years does seem less than “temporary.”

McSally’s appointment is being challenged in court:
https://amp.azcentral.com/amp/1968936001?__twitter_impression=true

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is so quaint to make an issue out of a $3200 donation that has been returned. How about the billion that Kushner received from Qatar? How about the patents that Ivanka received from China? Come on, people.

"....but but but BOTH SIDES!!!!"

-Chuck Todd and Jake Tapper in unison

It's not a both sides thing. That's a proportionality thing. This stupid $3200 that was quickly fixed v - waves hands - ALL THAT.

Both sides is: Everyone cheats! NBD!

This is - this candidate's thing wasn't really that bad, and the other side is doing REALLY BAD things, so I don't think this will stick or make a difference.

Anonymous wrote:It is so quaint to make an issue out of a $3200 donation that has been returned. How about the billion that Kushner received from Qatar? How about the patents that Ivanka received from China? Come on, people.

"....but but but BOTH SIDES!!!!"

-Chuck Todd and Jake Tapper in unison

It is so quaint to make an issue out of a $3200 donation that has been returned. How about the billion that Kushner received from Qatar? How about the patents that Ivanka received from China? Come on, people.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And Susan Collins has a formidable competitor for 2020-the speaker of Maine's state house.

https://www.cnn.com/2019/06/24/politics/susan-collins-maine-senate-challenger-sara-gideon-2020/index.html

A "formidable" competitor who has problems of her own..........

Seems she violated campaign finance laws.

https://www.timesrecord.com/articles/front-page/gideon-admits-violating-campaign-law/

This is small potatoes. Nothing matters anymore. Where's the Trump inaugural money?

Yeah, there's nothing wrong with using PAC money to reimburse oneself for donating to a political campaign, is there?

Like I said, it's small potatoes. It's $3200 and she already reimbursed the US Treasury for the mistake. Most people have car repairs in excess of that amount.

This isn't enough of an issue to distract voters from voting against the GOP.

The amount of money isn't the issue.
You think a person who is in politics and has run for office before didn't know better? Really? This seems pretty basic to me.

Susan Collins has been in the Senate for how long and “didn’t know better.”
“As recently as January 2019, Sen. Susan Collins’ campaign accepted illegal contributions from her own government staffers in an apparent violation of Senate ethics rules and federal law.”
https://american-ledger.com/corruption-secrecy/fec-reports-suggest-collins-violated-ethics-rules-by-accepting-campaign-contributions-from-her-government-staff/

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And Susan Collins has a formidable competitor for 2020-the speaker of Maine's state house.

https://www.cnn.com/2019/06/24/politics/susan-collins-maine-senate-challenger-sara-gideon-2020/index.html

A "formidable" competitor who has problems of her own..........

Seems she violated campaign finance laws.

https://www.timesrecord.com/articles/front-page/gideon-admits-violating-campaign-law/

This is small potatoes. Nothing matters anymore. Where's the Trump inaugural money?

Yeah, there's nothing wrong with using PAC money to reimburse oneself for donating to a political campaign, is there?

Like I said, it's small potatoes. It's $3200 and she already reimbursed the US Treasury for the mistake. Most people have car repairs in excess of that amount.

This isn't enough of an issue to distract voters from voting against the GOP.

The amount of money isn't the issue.
You think a person who is in politics and has run for office before didn't know better? Really? This seems pretty basic to me.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And Susan Collins has a formidable competitor for 2020-the speaker of Maine's state house.

https://www.cnn.com/2019/06/24/politics/susan-collins-maine-senate-challenger-sara-gideon-2020/index.html

A "formidable" competitor who has problems of her own..........

Seems she violated campaign finance laws.

https://www.timesrecord.com/articles/front-page/gideon-admits-violating-campaign-law/

This is small potatoes. Nothing matters anymore. Where's the Trump inaugural money?

Yeah, there's nothing wrong with using PAC money to reimburse oneself for donating to a political campaign, is there?

Like I said, it's small potatoes. It's $3200 and she already reimbursed the US Treasury for the mistake. Most people have car repairs in excess of that amount.

This isn't enough of an issue to distract voters from voting against the GOP.