Anonymous wrote:Not sure if anyone already said this. But I thought people paid the premium to live in N. Arlington FOR the public schools. If you are paying 1.5mil for your house to be in a good school pyramid, why wouldn't you use said school?
I might understand this thread more if someone was flashing wealth and sending their child to a poor performing school, but this thread is dumb and judgy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pp here. I was just thinking what I would have done if I won the billion dollar lottery. I remember thinking I would keep them in public school.
Oh hell, no. Your kids haven't been in private so you have no comparison, right? I have one in private on scholarship and it is just complete night and day to my other 2 kids. Amazing. Public is teaching the masses and just bringing up the rear. And by private, I mean decent college prep private. Not parochial school.
If you lived in a better school district you wouldn't see a disparity between the two. There are great publics in this area.
Where? Ones with teachers who have 12-15 kids per class. Who actually grade and correct homework, essays, and papers. Give ideas on the sides and give comments for improvement. Who know each child by name, know them personally, and are positive mentors in their lives.
You think public school teachers don’t know the names of the kids in their classes?
I know they don’t. My 4th grader’s treacher still calls her 3 different names, depending on the day. In high school, teachers have 120-150 kids they teach and grade a day. A private high school teacher at a decent school may have 50 max a day. You don’t think that effects effort, grading, corrections, mentoring, teachable moments, 1 on 1 help and tutoring, etc...? My kids get “great job” on assignments that are incorrect and misspelled - with zero corrections.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was talking to a mom from a public ES one afternoon while we were waiting for our kids and she told me that when they had their new house build, she had an entire room put together just to display her handbags. I'm serious. She was telling the wrong person though because all I could think was "WHY?" its just so boring, its not like it was a library or a sculpture room or a room displaying paintings.
Name the ES, or it didn't happen. I'm serious.
Jamestown, duh.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:To answer your question OP:
They're public school alums that came into a little money. The intrinsic value of a private k-12 education is outside of their scope, over their head. That's all. It's not necessarily bad, they just don't get it.
Or they know better than to send their kids to school with kids raised by people like you.
^exactly,
-Married to an old money Andover grad who was quite insistent (rightly so, I later realized) that we send our kids to public even though we can easily afford private.
Anonymous wrote:This whole thread is insufferable. I am embarrassed for all of the "wealthy" people bragging about what they can afford but "choose" not too. I don't care how much money those people have, why do they feel the need to come on an anonymous board to compare? What trash!
Anonymous wrote:You are being extremely judgmental. While I don't have a YSL bag, I could, and we could easily afford to send our kids to private. Why don't we? Because I want my kids to go to a school with all of their friends within walking distance. I don't want to drive to NW or Bethesda each day. I find Arlington to be very down to earth for the most part.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:To answer your question OP:
They're public school alums that came into a little money. The intrinsic value of a private k-12 education is outside of their scope, over their head. That's all. It's not necessarily bad, they just don't get it.
Or they know better than to send their kids to school with kids raised by people like you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pp here. I was just thinking what I would have done if I won the billion dollar lottery. I remember thinking I would keep them in public school.
Oh hell, no. Your kids haven't been in private so you have no comparison, right? I have one in private on scholarship and it is just complete night and day to my other 2 kids. Amazing. Public is teaching the masses and just bringing up the rear. And by private, I mean decent college prep private. Not parochial school.
If you lived in a better school district you wouldn't see a disparity between the two. There are great publics in this area.
Where? Ones with teachers who have 12-15 kids per class. Who actually grade and correct homework, essays, and papers. Give ideas on the sides and give comments for improvement. Who know each child by name, know them personally, and are positive mentors in their lives.