Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kellyanne or Nikki

Kellyanne has to keep her career as a GOP pollster when this is over, so I don’t think it’s her. Nikki, as others have mentioned, is in NYC so not in the thick of it.

This might be the best way to do it

Anonymous wrote:You can't commit "treason" against the POTUS. You can commit "treason" against your country or the Constitution.

see.. that's where you don't understand... to Trumpsters, Trump IS the US. They can't tell the difference. They really are a cult.

And what's with the "we didn't want to invoke the 25th amendment because we wanted to avoid a constitutional crisis..." crap. It's part of the constitution. What crisis would've occurred if they invoked it? What's the point of the 25th amendment if you never want to invoke it even if it's warranted?

Anonymous wrote:Eff this person who says it is serious enough to discuss the 25th amendment, but hey, we like tax cuts and regulation, so never mind, I’ll just go anonymous and send the Pres over the edge. This person will eventually be outed.

Maybe the plan is to be outed

You can't commit "treason" against the POTUS. You can commit "treason" against your country or the Constitution.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump is now demanding the NY Times turnover the source to the regime via tweet:

Donald J Trump: Does the so-called “Senior Administration Official” really exist, or is it just the Failing New York Times with another phony source? If the GUTLESS anonymous person does indeed exist, the Times must, for National Security purposes, turn him/her over to government at once!

It's quite interesting - the person is admitting that they are there to sabotage, so I'd say Trump is right re: National Security purposes.

The person is trying to save the country. That’s the opposite of sabotage and Trump calling it treason just shows how he confuses himself with the country.

+1. The oath is to the constitution, not the president.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump is now demanding the NY Times turnover the source to the regime via tweet:

Donald J Trump: Does the so-called “Senior Administration Official” really exist, or is it just the Failing New York Times with another phony source? If the GUTLESS anonymous person does indeed exist, the Times must, for National Security purposes, turn him/her over to government at once!

It's quite interesting - the person is admitting that they are there to sabotage, so I'd say Trump is right re: National Security purposes.

The person is trying to save the country. That’s the opposite of sabotage and Trump calling it treason just shows how he confuses himself with the country.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump is now demanding the NY Times turnover the source to the regime via tweet:

Donald J Trump: Does the so-called “Senior Administration Official” really exist, or is it just the Failing New York Times with another phony source? If the GUTLESS anonymous person does indeed exist, the Times must, for National Security purposes, turn him/her over to government at once!

It's quite interesting - the person is admitting that they are there to sabotage, so I'd say Trump is right re: National Security purposes.

I kind of agree with him for once. The anonymous source should speak up on the record about their concerns. Obviously Trump will fire them but they will get a lot of media coverage and more traction out of it that may help push the pendulum towards more sanity in this Administration.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it’s Sarah huck sanders. Her roots her in the old GOP and she’s media savvy, obviously.

One of the better bets, senior yet junior.

no way. "her roots are in the old GOP" - every time i see her father he is praising trump. when he ran in 2008 he was a bit of populist outsider as well.

Anonymous wrote:Trump is now demanding the NY Times turnover the source to the regime via tweet:

Donald J Trump: Does the so-called “Senior Administration Official” really exist, or is it just the Failing New York Times with another phony source? If the GUTLESS anonymous person does indeed exist, the Times must, for National Security purposes, turn him/her over to government at once!

It's quite interesting - the person is admitting that they are there to sabotage, so I'd say Trump is right re: National Security purposes.

Trump is now demanding the NY Times turnover the source to the regime via tweet:

Donald J Trump: Does the so-called “Senior Administration Official” really exist, or is it just the Failing New York Times with another phony source? If the GUTLESS anonymous person does indeed exist, the Times must, for National Security purposes, turn him/her over to government at once!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it’s Sanders

No way is that low-brow, bovine hillybilly. It could be Pence. (Or is it Mother?)

Ouch.

the current incarnation of deep throat.

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:My guess is that the author is Mike Pence and he wrote it in order to have evidence in the future showing that he didn't mindlessly go along with Trump. The author is clearly a right-winger who wants to be associated with Trump's actions that are popular with establishment Republicans, but wants to disassociate from Trump's crazier actions.

I hope not, this is OP and I thought it was Kellyanne. The way anchors on the news networks keep talking to her and an exchange she had with Cuomo about 'why do you think I'm doing this?' from a week or two ago made me think of her.

I doubt about it. She was the one went out to talk for Trump during the campaign and helped him elected. She would have found out about his issues long before election.

Anonymous wrote:I think it’s Sarah huck sanders. Her roots her in the old GOP and she’s media savvy, obviously.

One of the better bets, senior yet junior.

I think it’s Kudlow.