Anonymous wrote:Complex question. I know.
Please share your theories as to why.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, where exactly are you getting your premise that everyone was so thin back then? Are you looking at photos or movies or something? I was alive then and I remember seeing people of all sizes, with plenty who were on the heavy side.
I lived in a pretty international neighborhood, with a lot of immigrants from various countries, so that might have affected the looks of the people I sàw regularly. But even still, we were out and about in many places and I saw a wide range of sizes of people everywhere we went.
OP, are you out there? Can you give some background on what you're basing your ideas about how people looked in the 60s and 70s? Thanks!
LMAO that you've ignored streams of data of how much fatter we are and asking OP to verify it.
This is a totally different point: how much fatter we are. No one is debating that. What is being questioned is the notion that the entire population was very thin in 1970. Do you see the difference in those two points?
No there have always been fatties. There are just more now.
But the OP said that people of all ages were so thin during the 60s and 70s. We're asking what that assumption is based on.
It's not an assumption. It's a fact which has been studied for decades. One example of reporting research: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/06/12/look-at-how-much-weight-weve-gained-since-the-1960s/?utm_term=.49540e50ed9a
You are not posting any information about people being very thin in the 60s and 70s. You continue to post information about how fat people are NOW. Do you really not see the difference???? There's a difference between people being fat now and people being very thin in the 70's. Is this not clear to you?
NP. are we reading a different article? The one PP just posted has a very clear graph that shows how much heaver the average woman has gotten since the 1960s/70s. What exactlya re you looking for?
This article says the average woman weighed 140 in 1970. How is that very thin?
Yes, how is 140 lbs. "so thin"?
Maybe a better question would’ve been why the average woman weighs so much more than they did just a generation ago.
But that is not the question OP asked. OP asked specifically "why were Americans of all ages so thin during the 1960s and 1970s?" A number of us have been pointing out that people were not actually "so thin" during those decades.
People were thin. Perhaps where you and some others lived who keep saying the same thing there was a community of fat people and that is your view of the world. You were ahead of your time by being fat back then, eating garbage, and not exercising. Now we've all caught up to you. Amazing that you are also unable to distinguish between the weight difference over time. A 160 pound male four decades ago would be considered thin by today's standards.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, where exactly are you getting your premise that everyone was so thin back then? Are you looking at photos or movies or something? I was alive then and I remember seeing people of all sizes, with plenty who were on the heavy side.
I lived in a pretty international neighborhood, with a lot of immigrants from various countries, so that might have affected the looks of the people I sàw regularly. But even still, we were out and about in many places and I saw a wide range of sizes of people everywhere we went.
OP, are you out there? Can you give some background on what you're basing your ideas about how people looked in the 60s and 70s? Thanks!
LMAO that you've ignored streams of data of how much fatter we are and asking OP to verify it.
This is a totally different point: how much fatter we are. No one is debating that. What is being questioned is the notion that the entire population was very thin in 1970. Do you see the difference in those two points?
No there have always been fatties. There are just more now.
But the OP said that people of all ages were so thin during the 60s and 70s. We're asking what that assumption is based on.
It's not an assumption. It's a fact which has been studied for decades. One example of reporting research: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/06/12/look-at-how-much-weight-weve-gained-since-the-1960s/?utm_term=.49540e50ed9a
You are not posting any information about people being very thin in the 60s and 70s. You continue to post information about how fat people are NOW. Do you really not see the difference???? There's a difference between people being fat now and people being very thin in the 70's. Is this not clear to you?
NP. are we reading a different article? The one PP just posted has a very clear graph that shows how much heaver the average woman has gotten since the 1960s/70s. What exactlya re you looking for?
This article says the average woman weighed 140 in 1970. How is that very thin?
Yes, how is 140 lbs. "so thin"?
Maybe a better question would’ve been why the average woman weighs so much more than they did just a generation ago.
But that is not the question OP asked. OP asked specifically "why were Americans of all ages so thin during the 1960s and 1970s?" A number of us have been pointing out that people were not actually "so thin" during those decades.
People were thin. Perhaps where you and some others lived who keep saying the same thing there was a community of fat people and that is your view of the world. You were ahead of your time by being fat back then, eating garbage, and not exercising. Now we've all caught up to you. Amazing that you are also unable to distinguish between the weight difference over time. A 160 pound male four decades ago would be considered thin by today's standards.
Anonymous wrote:Kids also didnt snack non stop back then. sorry, kids do NOT need snack after 45 min of soccer. These are five year olds and are basically just standing aroud anyhow on the field. The snack culture in america is out of control.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, where exactly are you getting your premise that everyone was so thin back then? Are you looking at photos or movies or something? I was alive then and I remember seeing people of all sizes, with plenty who were on the heavy side.
I lived in a pretty international neighborhood, with a lot of immigrants from various countries, so that might have affected the looks of the people I sàw regularly. But even still, we were out and about in many places and I saw a wide range of sizes of people everywhere we went.
OP, are you out there? Can you give some background on what you're basing your ideas about how people looked in the 60s and 70s? Thanks!
LMAO that you've ignored streams of data of how much fatter we are and asking OP to verify it.
This is a totally different point: how much fatter we are. No one is debating that. What is being questioned is the notion that the entire population was very thin in 1970. Do you see the difference in those two points?
No there have always been fatties. There are just more now.
But the OP said that people of all ages were so thin during the 60s and 70s. We're asking what that assumption is based on.
It's not an assumption. It's a fact which has been studied for decades. One example of reporting research: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/06/12/look-at-how-much-weight-weve-gained-since-the-1960s/?utm_term=.49540e50ed9a
You are not posting any information about people being very thin in the 60s and 70s. You continue to post information about how fat people are NOW. Do you really not see the difference???? There's a difference between people being fat now and people being very thin in the 70's. Is this not clear to you?
NP. are we reading a different article? The one PP just posted has a very clear graph that shows how much heaver the average woman has gotten since the 1960s/70s. What exactlya re you looking for?
This article says the average woman weighed 140 in 1970. How is that very thin?
Yes, how is 140 lbs. "so thin"?
Maybe a better question would’ve been why the average woman weighs so much more than they did just a generation ago.
But that is not the question OP asked. OP asked specifically "why were Americans of all ages so thin during the 1960s and 1970s?" A number of us have been pointing out that people were not actually "so thin" during those decades.
People were thin. Perhaps where you and some others lived who keep saying the same thing there was a community of fat people and that is your view of the world. You were ahead of your time by being fat back then, eating garbage, and not exercising. Now we've all caught up to you. Amazing that you are also unable to distinguish between the weight difference over time. A 160 pound male four decades ago would be considered thin by today's standards.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, where exactly are you getting your premise that everyone was so thin back then? Are you looking at photos or movies or something? I was alive then and I remember seeing people of all sizes, with plenty who were on the heavy side.
I lived in a pretty international neighborhood, with a lot of immigrants from various countries, so that might have affected the looks of the people I sàw regularly. But even still, we were out and about in many places and I saw a wide range of sizes of people everywhere we went.
OP, are you out there? Can you give some background on what you're basing your ideas about how people looked in the 60s and 70s? Thanks!
LMAO that you've ignored streams of data of how much fatter we are and asking OP to verify it.
This is a totally different point: how much fatter we are. No one is debating that. What is being questioned is the notion that the entire population was very thin in 1970. Do you see the difference in those two points?
No there have always been fatties. There are just more now.
But the OP said that people of all ages were so thin during the 60s and 70s. We're asking what that assumption is based on.
It's not an assumption. It's a fact which has been studied for decades. One example of reporting research: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/06/12/look-at-how-much-weight-weve-gained-since-the-1960s/?utm_term=.49540e50ed9a
You are not posting any information about people being very thin in the 60s and 70s. You continue to post information about how fat people are NOW. Do you really not see the difference???? There's a difference between people being fat now and people being very thin in the 70's. Is this not clear to you?
NP. are we reading a different article? The one PP just posted has a very clear graph that shows how much heaver the average woman has gotten since the 1960s/70s. What exactlya re you looking for?
This article says the average woman weighed 140 in 1970. How is that very thin?
Yes, how is 140 lbs. "so thin"?
Maybe a better question would’ve been why the average woman weighs so much more than they did just a generation ago.
But that is not the question OP asked. OP asked specifically "why were Americans of all ages so thin during the 1960s and 1970s?" A number of us have been pointing out that people were not actually "so thin" during those decades.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just this morning in the Metro, I observed a tourist family of 5, parents and 3 kids. And, except for the baby in the arm, all 4 were on the obese side of the scale. The two, what looks like an elementary aged kids, were finishing up a 7up bottle.
It may be a special occasion and the parents allowed it, but in my household, we never drink soda. Its water or tea (unsweetened).
I was thinking, obese really starts from that young age? Pumping so much sugar from that soda cannot be healthy to the kids....
People ate pretty unhealthy back then too. I had a sugar cereal for breakfast, kool aid multiple times a day, hostess snack in my lunch and usually a dessert after dinner -- root beer floats were my favorite. And I was always skinny and still am. my theory is a combo of:
1. Hormones and antibiotics in our food supply is messing up our gut bacteria.
2. More sedentary. I used to play outside running around or on my bike from when I got home around 3:30 to dinner time.
3. More processed meals and eating out.
4. Larger portion sizes.
Btw - we don't buy soda now but I do let my kids have it at a restaurant occasionally. I think making it forbidden fruit is worse. I have family members who were not allowed any sweets as kids that started hoarding and hiding junk food and are now overweight.
Tourist families also come here from all over the country and from areas where a sedentary lifestyle 24/7 is common.
1. Sitting on a porch and chatting with neighbors - COMMON.
2. Driving 30 minutes to Walmart or to pick up groceries - COMMON.
3. Picking up fast food like Wendys on the way home after school - COMMON.
4. Sitting on the bleachers at ball games, IF YOU'RE KIDS EVEN PLAY. - COMMON.
5. Going to work and sitting - COMMON.
6. Staying at home and watching Ellen - COMMON.
D.C. and New York and places like it are probably the most intensive amount of exercise (re: walking) they get all year. Meanwhile I walk 4-5 miles a day just because, walk to groceries and gym, walk to pick-up dry cleaning.
It's a choice but its not easy. At all.
WOW it's so hard and you deserve a medal for being so much better than those porch-sittin', Ellen-watchin' country folk!
Hey, I grew up with those country folk! All of my aunts are at least 80 pounds overweight. They lunch on fried chicken and the only place they walk is to their mailbox. Even the local park is a 20-minute drive away.
You think it was easy to change my mindset? To be healthier? NEWSFLASH it wasn't.