Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Harvard wants to increase their URM students to a point! I agree that they are discriminating against Asians. However, I would argue that Harvard will not decrease the number of whites students below 50%. If that happens wealthy/elite whites will not want to attend and it will lose its status. I don't think that is fair, but that is the reality.
+1
Same as TJ. The few whites I know that were admitted, and also a couple Asians I know that were admitted -- don't want to attend TJ for this very reason. It is simply not a "diverse" experience any longer, when the majority is foreign or first generation Asian.
Well too bad for them, they will miss out on the best STEM education around, and whites will be underrepresented at the forefronts of the technological revolution (as they're already beginning to be in Silicon Valley).
PP here. Maybe. Maybe not. They don't want to be part of it, and TJ is missing out, truth be told.
Ok great--we can have a class of white kids who just want to be lawyers and society will be much better off. And there's no evidence TJ is "missing out." It still rocks every academic award imaginable.
Anonymous wrote:All this “casual racism” on this thread makes me sick to my stomach Asian kids aren’t robots—that’s just a narrative that other ethnic groups have devised to make themselves feel better when their kids are outperformed (as someone pointed out upthread, people used those same type of derogatory comments when talking about Jews at Harvard 50 years ago.)
I hope that all of you parents spewing bile about Asians on this thread read this story about Peter Wang who at the age of 15 was killed trying to help classmates escape from the Parkland massacre gunman at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School. At age 15 he had more character than any of you on this thread ever will.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/west-point-military-academy-admits-parkland-student-peter-wang-who-n849721
When the shooting started at the high school in Parkland, the Brooklyn NY born cadet yanked open a door that allowed dozens of classmates, teachers and staffers to escape, officials said. But as he stood at his post in his JROTC uniform and held the door open, Wang was shot and killed — one of the 17 students and staffers who died in the school that day.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Harvard wants to increase their URM students to a point! I agree that they are discriminating against Asians. However, I would argue that Harvard will not decrease the number of whites students below 50%. If that happens wealthy/elite whites will not want to attend and it will lose its status. I don't think that is fair, but that is the reality.
They are already below 50%. The last two classes have been majority-minority. You can look this up; indeed Harvard brags about it.
You really could argue that the Asians are proportionally represented, blacks and Hispanics slightly over-represented, and whites are under-represented. Really it's the whites who have a case here based on disparate impact.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Harvard wants to increase their URM students to a point! I agree that they are discriminating against Asians. However, I would argue that Harvard will not decrease the number of whites students below 50%. If that happens wealthy/elite whites will not want to attend and it will lose its status. I don't think that is fair, but that is the reality.
+1
Same as TJ. The few whites I know that were admitted, and also a couple Asians I know that were admitted -- don't want to attend TJ for this very reason. It is simply not a "diverse" experience any longer, when the majority is foreign or first generation Asian.
Well too bad for them, they will miss out on the best STEM education around, and whites will be underrepresented at the forefronts of the technological revolution (as they're already beginning to be in Silicon Valley).
PP here. Maybe. Maybe not. They don't want to be part of it, and TJ is missing out, truth be told.
Ok great--we can have a class of white kids who just want to be lawyers and society will be much better off. And there's no evidence TJ is "missing out." It still rocks every academic award imaginable.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Harvard wants to increase their URM students to a point! I agree that they are discriminating against Asians. However, I would argue that Harvard will not decrease the number of whites students below 50%. If that happens wealthy/elite whites will not want to attend and it will lose its status. I don't think that is fair, but that is the reality.
+1
Same as TJ. The few whites I know that were admitted, and also a couple Asians I know that were admitted -- don't want to attend TJ for this very reason. It is simply not a "diverse" experience any longer, when the majority is foreign or first generation Asian.
Well too bad for them, they will miss out on the best STEM education around, and whites will be underrepresented at the forefronts of the technological revolution (as they're already beginning to be in Silicon Valley).
When the shooting started at the high school in Parkland, the Brooklyn NY born cadet yanked open a door that allowed dozens of classmates, teachers and staffers to escape, officials said. But as he stood at his post in his JROTC uniform and held the door open, Wang was shot and killed — one of the 17 students and staffers who died in the school that day.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Harvard wants to increase their URM students to a point! I agree that they are discriminating against Asians. However, I would argue that Harvard will not decrease the number of whites students below 50%. If that happens wealthy/elite whites will not want to attend and it will lose its status. I don't think that is fair, but that is the reality.
+1
Same as TJ. The few whites I know that were admitted, and also a couple Asians I know that were admitted -- don't want to attend TJ for this very reason. It is simply not a "diverse" experience any longer, when the majority is foreign or first generation Asian.
Well too bad for them, they will miss out on the best STEM education around, and whites will be underrepresented at the forefronts of the technological revolution (as they're already beginning to be in Silicon Valley).
PP here. Maybe. Maybe not. They don't want to be part of it, and TJ is missing out, truth be told.
Ok great--we can have a class of white kids who just want to be lawyers and society will be much better off. And there's no evidence TJ is "missing out." It still rocks every academic award imaginable.
Has it produced a Zuckerberg or Gates? Just asking. They went to Harvard BTW.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Harvard wants to increase their URM students to a point! I agree that they are discriminating against Asians. However, I would argue that Harvard will not decrease the number of whites students below 50%. If that happens wealthy/elite whites will not want to attend and it will lose its status. I don't think that is fair, but that is the reality.
+1
Same as TJ. The few whites I know that were admitted, and also a couple Asians I know that were admitted -- don't want to attend TJ for this very reason. It is simply not a "diverse" experience any longer, when the majority is foreign or first generation Asian.
Well too bad for them, they will miss out on the best STEM education around, and whites will be underrepresented at the forefronts of the technological revolution (as they're already beginning to be in Silicon Valley).
PP here. Maybe. Maybe not. They don't want to be part of it, and TJ is missing out, truth be told.
Ok great--we can have a class of white kids who just want to be lawyers and society will be much better off. And there's no evidence TJ is "missing out." It still rocks every academic award imaginable.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All I know is Harvard engages in "racuial balancing" and that is perfectly legal.
Sure, they can "racuial balance" all they want, and return our federal tax dollars if they want to engage in discriminatory practices.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Harvard wants to increase their URM students to a point! I agree that they are discriminating against Asians. However, I would argue that Harvard will not decrease the number of whites students below 50%. If that happens wealthy/elite whites will not want to attend and it will lose its status. I don't think that is fair, but that is the reality.
+1
Same as TJ. The few whites I know that were admitted, and also a couple Asians I know that were admitted -- don't want to attend TJ for this very reason. It is simply not a "diverse" experience any longer, when the majority is foreign or first generation Asian.
Well too bad for them, they will miss out on the best STEM education around, and whites will be underrepresented at the forefronts of the technological revolution (as they're already beginning to be in Silicon Valley).
PP here. Maybe. Maybe not. They don't want to be part of it, and TJ is missing out, truth be told.
Anonymous wrote:All I know is Harvard engages in "racuial balancing" and that is perfectly legal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Harvard wants to increase their URM students to a point! I agree that they are discriminating against Asians. However, I would argue that Harvard will not decrease the number of whites students below 50%. If that happens wealthy/elite whites will not want to attend and it will lose its status. I don't think that is fair, but that is the reality.
+1
Same as TJ. The few whites I know that were admitted, and also a couple Asians I know that were admitted -- don't want to attend TJ for this very reason. It is simply not a "diverse" experience any longer, when the majority is foreign or first generation Asian.
Well too bad for them, they will miss out on the best STEM education around, and whites will be underrepresented at the forefronts of the technological revolution (as they're already beginning to be in Silicon Valley).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Harvard wants to increase their URM students to a point! I agree that they are discriminating against Asians. However, I would argue that Harvard will not decrease the number of whites students below 50%. If that happens wealthy/elite whites will not want to attend and it will lose its status. I don't think that is fair, but that is the reality.
+1
Same as TJ. The few whites I know that were admitted, and also a couple Asians I know that were admitted -- don't want to attend TJ for this very reason. It is simply not a "diverse" experience any longer, when the majority is foreign or first generation Asian.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All I know is Harvard engages in "racuial balancing" and that is perfectly legal.
sorry, racial
As a Harvard Alum, I agree that having a balanced class is valuable in the learning and social experience. The kids who came in with only high GPA/SAT scores added absolutely nothing to the experience and environment. I've also talked to a number of my former Asian classmates and none of them support this lawsuit. I don't think they want to be further stereotyped by an influx of high GPA/SAT robots.
Anonymous wrote:Harvard wants to increase their URM students to a point! I agree that they are discriminating against Asians. However, I would argue that Harvard will not decrease the number of whites students below 50%. If that happens wealthy/elite whites will not want to attend and it will lose its status. I don't think that is fair, but that is the reality.