Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
20:12 - something is very wrong with your scores. You inflated Blair, deflated Churchill, and slightly inflated Wheaton.
Here are the SAT scores available at Niche.com
Churchill 1330
Blair 1270
Einstein and Wheaton 1150
The PP's intent was to look past simple averages that GS uses which serve only to identify which high-schools draw a higher percentage of rich kids., and provide a better, refined analysis that looks at the granular data.
When you isolate for race which is proxy a for socioeconomic status there is not much of a disparity between the performance of kids of the same backgrounds across these schools.
For example, when you compare average SAT scores for MCPS schools for a larger demographic common to all these schools the great schools narrative begins to fall apart and it becomes clear they're not all that different.
Blair 1326
Walter Johnson 1275
Wooton 1262
Churchill 1257
Wheaton 1173
Einstein 1148
The data is for the largest cohort common to the aforementioned schools on page 10.
http://montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/shareda...c_Perf%20Class%20of%202017.pdf
Except the data doesn't show that kids do the same. As a PP pointed out AA students do better at Churchill than Blair. I also still didn't see the numbers that the PP is posting and can't figure out how she got them. Did she only include Asian students in the magnet program for Blair and then remove the Asian students from Churchill? Weird.
Regardless, the PP's maneuvering doesn't particularly help the DCC schools. Every other source available will report the actual average which has schools like Churchill and Wootton up in the 1300s and Blair in the 1200s with Wheaton/Einstein in the mid 1100s. No parent is going to rifle through internal MCPS data to cherry pick certain scores and come to the conclusion that somehow Blair is better. Every ranking from US News to Niche to Great Schools has the DCC schools in the middle to bottom. It just is what it is.
Asian and white students do better at Blair than any W schools. Blair has more academic achievements than all the W schools combined, and it's not even close. Blair is nationally known while the W's are not (well except on paper).
It just is what it is.
Anonymous wrote:So how would you rank the DCC high schools for a student that does well in schools and doesn't have strong interest in any of the academies? It sounds like:
1. Blair
2. Einstein
3. Northwood
4. Wheaton
5. Kennedy
No, I'd put Einstein first. Blair's "shine" is all about the magnets and special programs. A normal kid just sits in the shadow and the general program are not very good. Plus Blair is very PR focused to keep the magnet program shining and "sweeps" other problems under the rug to keep up appearances. Einstein is more solid.
Einstein
Northwood
Wheaton
Blair/Kennedy
So how would you rank the DCC high schools for a student that does well in schools and doesn't have strong interest in any of the academies? It sounds like:
1. Blair
2. Einstein
3. Northwood
4. Wheaton
5. Kennedy
Anonymous wrote:So how would you rank the DCC high schools for a student that does well in schools and doesn't have strong interest in any of the academies? It sounds like:
1. Blair
2. Einstein
3. Northwood
4. Wheaton
5. Kennedy
With maybe switching Northwood and Wheaton? Or Einstein and Northwood?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:20:12 - something is very wrong with your scores. You inflated Blair, deflated Churchill, and slightly inflated Wheaton.
Here are the SAT scores available at Niche.com
Churchill 1330
Blair 1270
Einstein and Wheaton 1150
The PP's intent was to look past simple averages that GS uses which serve only to identify which high-schools draw a higher percentage of rich kids., and provide a better, refined analysis that looks at the granular data.
When you isolate for race which is proxy a for socioeconomic status there is not much of a disparity between the performance of kids of the same backgrounds across these schools.
For example, when you compare average SAT scores for MCPS schools for a larger demographic common to all these schools the great schools narrative begins to fall apart and it becomes clear they're not all that different.
Blair 1326
Walter Johnson 1275
Wooton 1262
Churchill 1257
Wheaton 1173
Einstein 1148
The data is for the largest cohort common to the aforementioned schools on page 10.
http://montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/sharedaccountability/reports/2017/1771102HS%20Princ_SAT%20Partic_Perf%20Class%20of%202017.pdf
I've suspected the same kid would do more or less the same at any of these schools too, but your analysis underscores this for me. Unfortunately, this won't go over well with people who paid big bucks to live in the segregated areas.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
20:12 - something is very wrong with your scores. You inflated Blair, deflated Churchill, and slightly inflated Wheaton.
Here are the SAT scores available at Niche.com
Churchill 1330
Blair 1270
Einstein and Wheaton 1150
The PP's intent was to look past simple averages that GS uses which serve only to identify which high-schools draw a higher percentage of rich kids., and provide a better, refined analysis that looks at the granular data.
When you isolate for race which is proxy a for socioeconomic status there is not much of a disparity between the performance of kids of the same backgrounds across these schools.
For example, when you compare average SAT scores for MCPS schools for a larger demographic common to all these schools the great schools narrative begins to fall apart and it becomes clear they're not all that different.
Blair 1326
Walter Johnson 1275
Wooton 1262
Churchill 1257
Wheaton 1173
Einstein 1148
The data is for the largest cohort common to the aforementioned schools on page 10.
http://montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/shareda...c_Perf%20Class%20of%202017.pdf
Except the data doesn't show that kids do the same. As a PP pointed out AA students do better at Churchill than Blair. I also still didn't see the numbers that the PP is posting and can't figure out how she got them. Did she only include Asian students in the magnet program for Blair and then remove the Asian students from Churchill? Weird.
Regardless, the PP's maneuvering doesn't particularly help the DCC schools. Every other source available will report the actual average which has schools like Churchill and Wootton up in the 1300s and Blair in the 1200s with Wheaton/Einstein in the mid 1100s. No parent is going to rifle through internal MCPS data to cherry pick certain scores and come to the conclusion that somehow Blair is better. Every ranking from US News to Niche to Great Schools has the DCC schools in the middle to bottom. It just is what it is.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
20:12 - something is very wrong with your scores. You inflated Blair, deflated Churchill, and slightly inflated Wheaton.
Here are the SAT scores available at Niche.com
Churchill 1330
Blair 1270
Einstein and Wheaton 1150
The PP's intent was to look past simple averages that GS uses which serve only to identify which high-schools draw a higher percentage of rich kids., and provide a better, refined analysis that looks at the granular data.
When you isolate for race which is proxy a for socioeconomic status there is not much of a disparity between the performance of kids of the same backgrounds across these schools.
For example, when you compare average SAT scores for MCPS schools for a larger demographic common to all these schools the great schools narrative begins to fall apart and it becomes clear they're not all that different.
Blair 1326
Walter Johnson 1275
Wooton 1262
Churchill 1257
Wheaton 1173
Einstein 1148
The data is for the largest cohort common to the aforementioned schools on page 10.
http://montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/shareda...c_Perf%20Class%20of%202017.pdf
Except the data doesn't show that kids do the same. As a PP pointed out AA students do better at Churchill than Blair. I also still didn't see the numbers that the PP is posting and can't figure out how she got them. Did she only include Asian students in the magnet program for Blair and then remove the Asian students from Churchill? Weird.
Regardless, the PP's maneuvering doesn't particularly help the DCC schools. Every other source available will report the actual average which has schools like Churchill and Wootton up in the 1300s and Blair in the 1200s with Wheaton/Einstein in the mid 1100s. No parent is going to rifle through internal MCPS data to cherry pick certain scores and come to the conclusion that somehow Blair is better. Every ranking from US News to Niche to Great Schools has the DCC schools in the middle to bottom. It just is what it is.
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
20:12 - something is very wrong with your scores. You inflated Blair, deflated Churchill, and slightly inflated Wheaton.
Here are the SAT scores available at Niche.com
Churchill 1330
Blair 1270
Einstein and Wheaton 1150
The PP's intent was to look past simple averages that GS uses which serve only to identify which high-schools draw a higher percentage of rich kids., and provide a better, refined analysis that looks at the granular data.
When you isolate for race which is proxy a for socioeconomic status there is not much of a disparity between the performance of kids of the same backgrounds across these schools.
For example, when you compare average SAT scores for MCPS schools for a larger demographic common to all these schools the great schools narrative begins to fall apart and it becomes clear they're not all that different.
Blair 1326
Walter Johnson 1275
Wooton 1262
Churchill 1257
Wheaton 1173
Einstein 1148
The data is for the largest cohort common to the aforementioned schools on page 10.
http://montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/shareda...c_Perf%20Class%20of%202017.pdf
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:20:12 - something is very wrong with your scores. You inflated Blair, deflated Churchill, and slightly inflated Wheaton.
Here are the SAT scores available at Niche.com
Churchill 1330
Blair 1270
Einstein and Wheaton 1150
The PP's intent was to look past simple averages that GS uses which serve only to identify which high-schools draw a higher percentage of rich kids., and provide a better, refined analysis that looks at the granular data.
When you isolate for race which is proxy a for socioeconomic status there is not much of a disparity between the performance of kids of the same backgrounds across these schools.
For example, when you compare average SAT scores for MCPS schools for a larger demographic common to all these schools the great schools narrative begins to fall apart and it becomes clear they're not all that different.
Blair 1326
Walter Johnson 1275
Wooton 1262
Churchill 1257
Wheaton 1173
Einstein 1148
The data is for the largest cohort common to the aforementioned schools on page 10.
http://montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/sharedaccountability/reports/2017/1771102HS%20Princ_SAT%20Partic_Perf%20Class%20of%202017.pdf