Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s happy, well-educated, gorgeous, rich, a great mom, well-put together. I bet her closet is even beautiful.

Many people hate people whose feathers don’t get ruffled no matter how hard others try to ruffle them.

Melt down in 5, 4, 3, 2, 1....

I am the OP. I don't disagree with these statements, actually. What I am discussing is about something else entirely.

I am getting frustrated that most people trying to tear down this post and its sentiments are truly terrible at reading comprehension and analysis!

Thank you for responding to my post, OP. Not sure why you picked mine when there are so many others affirming your confirmation bias. Here is the thing. I have teenagers and I’m not going to willingly drag myslef into their world of over-analyzing stupidity when there are so many greater concerns in the world. She gives off good energy to me in the limited time I have thought about it and I legitimately don’t get the “darkness” from her.

Having said that, the entire blood diamond issue which has been around for centuries pisses me off.

OP again. Happy to respond to your post, and will respond to this one as well: it makes NO sense and I do not understand what you are trying to say, at all.

Okay, shorter: Don’t you have anything better to do?

This is so easy!

Couldn't the same be said for you?

I didn’t start the thread.

And yet here you are, responding many times, never once addressing the original question at hand.

I started the thread because I wanted to dialogue about a particular phenomenon that I am experiencing. But by all means, you are welcome to pop in and out and in again to try to derail the original topic and spew shallow analyses and poorly written criticisms.

You wanted *to dialogue*?! Omg! Ivanka is that you? Are you trying to *architect* a new public image?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s happy, well-educated, gorgeous, rich, a great mom, well-put together. I bet her closet is even beautiful.

Many people hate people whose feathers don’t get ruffled no matter how hard others try to ruffle them.

Melt down in 5, 4, 3, 2, 1....

I am the OP. I don't disagree with these statements, actually. What I am discussing is about something else entirely.

I am getting frustrated that most people trying to tear down this post and its sentiments are truly terrible at reading comprehension and analysis!

Thank you for responding to my post, OP. Not sure why you picked mine when there are so many others affirming your confirmation bias. Here is the thing. I have teenagers and I’m not going to willingly drag myslef into their world of over-analyzing stupidity when there are so many greater concerns in the world. She gives off good energy to me in the limited time I have thought about it and I legitimately don’t get the “darkness” from her.

Having said that, the entire blood diamond issue which has been around for centuries pisses me off.

OP again. Happy to respond to your post, and will respond to this one as well: it makes NO sense and I do not understand what you are trying to say, at all.

Okay, shorter: Don’t you have anything better to do?

This is so easy!

Couldn't the same be said for you?

I didn’t start the thread.

And yet here you are, responding many times, never once addressing the original question at hand.

I started the thread because I wanted to dialogue about a particular phenomenon that I am experiencing. But by all means, you are welcome to pop in and out and in again to try to derail the original topic and spew shallow analyses and poorly written criticisms.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This sums it up pretty well. She wants to have all the privileges of being the President's daughter without any of its drawbacks.
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2018/02/26/ivanka-should-quit-217089

Assistant to the president Ivanka Trump dodged the press like a professional on Sunday when NBC News’ Peter Alexander asked her in a sit-down interview, “Do you believe your father’s accusers?”

Taking a short pause to consider a question she had to know was coming, Trump responded: “I think it’s a pretty inappropriate question to ask a daughter if she believes the accusers of her father when he’s affirmatively stated there’s no truth to it.”

If Ivanka Trump wants to recuse herself from the tough questions, here’s what she should do: Withdraw from the very public political life she has chosen. Reporters hang on what she says because she possesses political power. By resigning her position, by ceasing to advise the president, by ending her official role as the president’s emissary, that power will vanish and so will most of the press corps’ interest. Oh, reporters will still cover her as a rich celebrity and as presidential offspring but as a non-official, she won’t owe reporters any answers. If she still wants to call questions about her father's questionable conduct “inappropriate,” I won't agree with her. But I won’t fuss.

Truth!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s happy, well-educated, gorgeous, rich, a great mom, well-put together. I bet her closet is even beautiful.

Many people hate people whose feathers don’t get ruffled no matter how hard others try to ruffle them.

Melt down in 5, 4, 3, 2, 1....

I am the OP. I don't disagree with these statements, actually. What I am discussing is about something else entirely.

I am getting frustrated that most people trying to tear down this post and its sentiments are truly terrible at reading comprehension and analysis!

Thank you for responding to my post, OP. Not sure why you picked mine when there are so many others affirming your confirmation bias. Here is the thing. I have teenagers and I’m not going to willingly drag myslef into their world of over-analyzing stupidity when there are so many greater concerns in the world. She gives off good energy to me in the limited time I have thought about it and I legitimately don’t get the “darkness” from her.

Having said that, the entire blood diamond issue which has been around for centuries pisses me off.

OP again. Happy to respond to your post, and will respond to this one as well: it makes NO sense and I do not understand what you are trying to say, at all.

Okay, shorter: Don’t you have anything better to do?

This is so easy!

Couldn't the same be said for you?

I didn’t start the thread.

And yet here you are, responding many times, never once addressing the original question at hand.

I started the thread because I wanted to dialogue about a particular phenomenon that I am experiencing. But by all means, you are welcome to pop in and out and in again to try to derail the original topic and spew shallow analyses and poorly written criticisms.

Anonymous wrote:This sums it up pretty well. She wants to have all the privileges of being the President's daughter without any of its drawbacks.
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2018/02/26/ivanka-should-quit-217089

Assistant to the president Ivanka Trump dodged the press like a professional on Sunday when NBC News’ Peter Alexander asked her in a sit-down interview, “Do you believe your father’s accusers?”

Taking a short pause to consider a question she had to know was coming, Trump responded: “I think it’s a pretty inappropriate question to ask a daughter if she believes the accusers of her father when he’s affirmatively stated there’s no truth to it.”

If Ivanka Trump wants to recuse herself from the tough questions, here’s what she should do: Withdraw from the very public political life she has chosen. Reporters hang on what she says because she possesses political power. By resigning her position, by ceasing to advise the president, by ending her official role as the president’s emissary, that power will vanish and so will most of the press corps’ interest. Oh, reporters will still cover her as a rich celebrity and as presidential offspring but as a non-official, she won’t owe reporters any answers. If she still wants to call questions about her father's questionable conduct “inappropriate,” I won't agree with her. But I won’t fuss.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s happy, well-educated, gorgeous, rich, a great mom, well-put together. I bet her closet is even beautiful.

Many people hate people whose feathers don’t get ruffled no matter how hard others try to ruffle them.

Melt down in 5, 4, 3, 2, 1....

I am the OP. I don't disagree with these statements, actually. What I am discussing is about something else entirely.

I am getting frustrated that most people trying to tear down this post and its sentiments are truly terrible at reading comprehension and analysis!

Thank you for responding to my post, OP. Not sure why you picked mine when there are so many others affirming your confirmation bias. Here is the thing. I have teenagers and I’m not going to willingly drag myslef into their world of over-analyzing stupidity when there are so many greater concerns in the world. She gives off good energy to me in the limited time I have thought about it and I legitimately don’t get the “darkness” from her.

Having said that, the entire blood diamond issue which has been around for centuries pisses me off.

OP again. Happy to respond to your post, and will respond to this one as well: it makes NO sense and I do not understand what you are trying to say, at all.

Okay, shorter: Don’t you have anything better to do?

This is so easy!

Couldn't the same be said for you?

I didn’t start the thread.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s happy, well-educated, gorgeous, rich, a great mom, well-put together. I bet her closet is even beautiful.

Many people hate people whose feathers don’t get ruffled no matter how hard others try to ruffle them.

Melt down in 5, 4, 3, 2, 1....

I am the OP. I don't disagree with these statements, actually. What I am discussing is about something else entirely.

I am getting frustrated that most people trying to tear down this post and its sentiments are truly terrible at reading comprehension and analysis!

Thank you for responding to my post, OP. Not sure why you picked mine when there are so many others affirming your confirmation bias. Here is the thing. I have teenagers and I’m not going to willingly drag myslef into their world of over-analyzing stupidity when there are so many greater concerns in the world. She gives off good energy to me in the limited time I have thought about it and I legitimately don’t get the “darkness” from her.

Having said that, the entire blood diamond issue which has been around for centuries pisses me off.

OP again. Happy to respond to your post, and will respond to this one as well: it makes NO sense and I do not understand what you are trying to say, at all.

Okay, shorter: Don’t you have anything better to do?

This is so easy!

Couldn't the same be said for you?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s just you, OP.

It’s at least two of us.

First, Ivanka is a criminal. That makes her repellent right off the bat.

She’s completely fake, from her hair to her boobs to her nose to her carefully modulated voice, fake smile, artificial laugh, faux positions on issues she pretends to “care” about.

Anyone who spends that much time on her appearance comes across as completely plastic. Do you think she and Jarrod have sex, or did they have test tube babies to avoid messing up her makeup?

Speaking of Jarrod, even Ivanka’s relationship seems fake. They don’t appear to have the slightest affection for each other. They look like two animated dolls walking alongside each other.

I see her holding her baby now and then, but that looks fake too, as there’s no pulled hair or spit up on her, so likely the nanny handed her the baby for the shot, then Ivanka immediately handed the kid back to the nanny, who is likely the real mom to Ivanka’s kids anyway.

There is no way to relate to such an artificial person.

And, of course, she’s a criminal, which I can’t relate to at all.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s happy, well-educated, gorgeous, rich, a great mom, well-put together. I bet her closet is even beautiful.

Many people hate people whose feathers don’t get ruffled no matter how hard others try to ruffle them.

Melt down in 5, 4, 3, 2, 1....

I am the OP. I don't disagree with these statements, actually. What I am discussing is about something else entirely.

I am getting frustrated that most people trying to tear down this post and its sentiments are truly terrible at reading comprehension and analysis!

Thank you for responding to my post, OP. Not sure why you picked mine when there are so many others affirming your confirmation bias. Here is the thing. I have teenagers and I’m not going to willingly drag myslef into their world of over-analyzing stupidity when there are so many greater concerns in the world. She gives off good energy to me in the limited time I have thought about it and I legitimately don’t get the “darkness” from her.

Having said that, the entire blood diamond issue which has been around for centuries pisses me off.

OP again. Happy to respond to your post, and will respond to this one as well: it makes NO sense and I do not understand what you are trying to say, at all.

Okay, shorter: Don’t you have anything better to do?

Anonymous wrote:It’s just you, OP.

Assistant to the president Ivanka Trump dodged the press like a professional on Sunday when NBC News’ Peter Alexander asked her in a sit-down interview, “Do you believe your father’s accusers?”

Taking a short pause to consider a question she had to know was coming, Trump responded: “I think it’s a pretty inappropriate question to ask a daughter if she believes the accusers of her father when he’s affirmatively stated there’s no truth to it.”

If Ivanka Trump wants to recuse herself from the tough questions, here’s what she should do: Withdraw from the very public political life she has chosen. Reporters hang on what she says because she possesses political power. By resigning her position, by ceasing to advise the president, by ending her official role as the president’s emissary, that power will vanish and so will most of the press corps’ interest. Oh, reporters will still cover her as a rich celebrity and as presidential offspring but as a non-official, she won’t owe reporters any answers. If she still wants to call questions about her father's questionable conduct “inappropriate,” I won't agree with her. But I won’t fuss.

Anonymous wrote:That she's a raging hypocrite and co-ops feminism to be part of her brand without actually wanting to advocate for women.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s happy, well-educated, gorgeous, rich, a great mom, well-put together. I bet her closet is even beautiful.

Many people hate people whose feathers don’t get ruffled no matter how hard others try to ruffle them.

Melt down in 5, 4, 3, 2, 1....

I am the OP. I don't disagree with these statements, actually. What I am discussing is about something else entirely.

I am getting frustrated that most people trying to tear down this post and its sentiments are truly terrible at reading comprehension and analysis!

Thank you for responding to my post, OP. Not sure why you picked mine when there are so many others affirming your confirmation bias. Here is the thing. I have teenagers and I’m not going to willingly drag myslef into their world of over-analyzing stupidity when there are so many greater concerns in the world. She gives off good energy to me in the limited time I have thought about it and I legitimately don’t get the “darkness” from her.

Having said that, the entire blood diamond issue which has been around for centuries pisses me off.

OP again. Happy to respond to your post, and will respond to this one as well: it makes NO sense and I do not understand what you are trying to say, at all.

Anonymous wrote:She's certainly not a natural blonde.